Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -12.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -22.1%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $9.3B | $4.3B | $3.3B | $2.7B | $473M | $2.1B | $713M | $22M | $20M | $171M | $16M |
| Enterprise Value | $10.0B | $5.0B | $3.6B | $2.1B | $265M | $1.8B | $490M | $15M | $22M | $129M | $10M |
| P/E Ratio → | -12.66 | — | 30.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 14.98 | 6.93 | 8.69 | 9.65 | 1.83 | 9.80 | 59.03 | 3.27 | 2.62 | — | 205.53 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.94 | 1.51 | 1.04 | 1.43 | 0.41 | 1.55 | 2.57 | 0.84 | 4.51 | 3.44 | 1.05 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 81.84 | 891.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.94 | 9.59 | 7.60 | 1.03 | 8.40 | 40.54 | 2.22 | 2.81 | — | 134.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 9.82 | 11.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 32.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -15.6% | -15.6% | 30.2% | 9.4% | 25.3% | 61.5% | 48.3% | 10.8% | 25.8% | 90.7% | 97.1% |
| Operating Margin | -61.8% | -61.8% | 40.8% | -22.5% | -197.8% | -14.0% | -128.7% | -137.7% | -756.7% | -4878.2% | -5943.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -102.4% | -102.4% | 29.0% | -17.6% | -196.6% | -7.2% | -116.8% | -293.1% | -739.4% | -7359.7% | -4026.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -22.1% | -22.1% | 4.3% | -3.3% | -40.8% | -1.9% | -9.3% | -130.4% | -214.4% | -61.5% | -27.6% |
| ROA | -16.8% | -16.8% | 3.7% | -2.9% | -35.9% | -1.7% | -9.1% | -90.6% | -175.3% | -57.2% | -22.5% |
| ROIC | -8.0% | -8.0% | 4.1% | -3.1% | -30.3% | -2.7% | -7.7% | -43.1% | -159.2% | -30.4% | -28.4% |
| ROCE | -11.0% | -11.0% | 5.4% | -4.0% | -39.3% | -3.5% | -10.2% | -55.0% | -203.0% | -39.1% | -36.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | — | 0.01 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.68 | 0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.22 | 0.11 | -0.30 | -0.18 | -0.22 | -0.81 | -0.27 | 0.33 | -0.84 | -0.36 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 0.92 | -3.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -16.57 | -16.57 | 56.49 | — | -397.24 | -50.29 | — | -166.59 | -495.00 | -2.75 | -102.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 3.74 | 8.33 | 3.65 | 5.14 | 98.57 | 3.75 | 0.35 | 40.74 | 13.03 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.96 | 0.96 | 3.74 | 8.33 | 3.65 | 5.14 | 98.57 | 3.75 | 0.35 | 40.74 | 13.03 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1.73 | 4.93 | 1.90 | 2.84 | 93.19 | 2.21 | 0.03 | 40.03 | 5.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.57 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.6% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 3.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 2.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 2.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 5.8% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $341M | $319M | $175M | $139M | $93M | $42M | $20M | $13M | $6M | $4M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RIOT stock.
Riot Platforms, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -12.7x. The historical average is 30.0x.
Riot Platforms, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -22.1%. The historical average is -70.6%.
Based on historical data, Riot Platforms, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -12.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Riot Platforms, Inc. has -15.6% gross margin and -61.8% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Negative margins and dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Priced as Bitcoin Proxy
RIOT trades at 2.31x book versus peers like MARA at 0.99x, implying the market prices it as a high-beta Bitcoin play rather than a cash-flow-generative asset, according to recent valuation data.
The P/B multiple of 2.31x is at a significant premium to Marathon Digital's 0.99x and CleanSpark's 1.70x, suggesting investors are paying for hash rate growth and optionality on Bitcoin's price rather than current earnings. Given the negative ROE of -10.3% in 2026Q2, this valuation implies expectations of a sharp profitability recovery, likely tied to Bitcoin appreciation and successful deployment of the Corsicana facility. The P/S of 11.32x further underscores that revenue growth is being rewarded despite deep losses, a pattern typical of speculative growth assets.
Negative ROE Driven by Non-Cash Charges
ROE deteriorated to -10.3% in 2026Q2 from +7.0% in 2025Q2, as per financial statements, with net margin at -102.4% reflecting heavy depreciation and impairment provisions that obscure underlying cash generation.
The DuPont decomposition shows that ROE is dragged down by a net margin of -102.4%, while asset utilization (revenue/assets) improved to 5.3% on 71.9% revenue growth, but this is insufficient to offset the cost structure. The negative NIM of 0.0% is negligible, as RIOT is not a traditional lender; instead, non-interest income (97.9% of revenue) dominates, but it is volatile and tied to Bitcoin prices. The equity multiplier (assets/equity) of 1.49x is low, indicating that leverage is not amplifying returns, but the lack of profitability suggests the model is not yet self-sustaining.
Efficiency Ratio Spikes on Revenue Mix
RIOT's efficiency ratio jumped to 161.1% in 2026Q2 from 45.6% in 2026Q1, as per quarterly data, indicating that operating expenses are outpacing revenue growth, a trend that warrants close monitoring of cost controls.
The efficiency ratio spike is primarily due to a surge in non-interest expenses, likely from depreciation on new miners and higher power costs, while revenue growth of 71.9% YoY was not enough to offset these. The negative gross margin of -15.6% suggests that the cost of mining (power, depreciation) exceeds the value of Bitcoin produced, a structural issue that may persist unless Bitcoin prices rise or fleet efficiency improves. The company's ability to curtail power usage during peak demand provides some cost relief, but this is unpredictable and not reflected in the efficiency ratio, which remains elevated.
Equity Cushion Thins as Losses Mount
Equity-to-assets ratio fell to 0.67 in 2026Q2 from 0.95 in 2024Q1, as per balance sheet data, indicating a weakening capital position as losses erode retained earnings, though debt remains minimal at 0.10% D/E.
The decline in equity-to-assets from 0.95 to 0.67 reflects both net losses and asset growth, but the low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.10% suggests RIOT is not reliant on leverage, which is a positive relative to peers like MARA (D/E 1.05). However, the reliance on equity funding, likely through ATM offerings, has led to dilution, as seen in the drop in tangible book value per share from $9.37 in 2024Q4 to $5.87 in 2026Q2. This dilution, combined with negative ROE, indicates that the capital base is being consumed by operational losses, raising questions about the sustainability of the expansion strategy without further equity raises.
Impairments Signal Digital Asset Risk
Provision expenses surged to $130.3M in 2026Q2 from $46.7M in 2024Q1, as per cash flow data, suggesting increasing concerns about the recoverability of digital asset holdings and equipment, a key credit quality risk.
The rising provisions are likely tied to impairments on Bitcoin holdings and ASIC miners, which have short useful lives and are sensitive to technological obsolescence. The investment securities portfolio declined from $2.2B in 2025Q2 to $736.2M in 2026Q2, potentially reflecting realized losses or sales to fund operations, which warrants further investigation into the quality of remaining assets. While RIOT does not have a traditional loan book, the asset quality risk is concentrated in its digital assets and mining equipment, which are subject to significant price volatility and depreciation.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality
The P/E ratio of -9.94 is meaningless for RIOT due to large non-cash charges like depreciation and impairments, which distort net income, as per financial statements, so investors should focus on P/B and cash flow metrics instead.
The negative P/E is driven by accounting losses that do not reflect cash generation, as evidenced by the $130.3M provision expense and heavy depreciation, which are non-cash items. A more appropriate metric is P/B, which at 2.31x still implies a premium, but it better captures the book value of mining infrastructure and digital assets. Additionally, investors should monitor operating cash flow, which was -$90.1M in 2026Q2, to assess the true cash burn rate, as the income statement may understate the company's liquidity needs.