Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.5x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2022–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2328 | $57350 | $75M | $93M |
| Enterprise Value | $4M | $4M | $75M | $93M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.47 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 60617.98 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -343.5% | — |
| ROA | -0.6% | -0.6% | -4.3% | -841.0% |
| ROIC | -524.9% | -524.9% | — | — |
| ROCE | -715.3% | -715.3% | -346.2% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 523.80 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | -0.22 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -218.00 | -218.00 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.37 | 5.37 | 7.73 | 0.01 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.37 | 5.37 | 7.73 | 0.01 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.56 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 100.0% | 100.0% | 54.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 100.0% | 100.0% | 54.1% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $5000 | $7M | $9M |
Imminent liquidity exhaustion
As reported in financial statements, RMSG's P/E ratio of -0.47 reflects a company currently devoid of core earnings, rendering traditional valuation multiples largely inapplicable for assessing the firm's intrinsic value or its speculative potential within the competitive prop-tech landscape.
The absence of positive earnings or revenue streams makes standard valuation metrics like P/E or EV/EBITDA ineffective for benchmarking against peers like Zillow or Compass. Investors appear to be pricing the stock as a high-risk option on future network adoption rather than on any current fundamental performance, which warrants extreme caution.
Based on RMSG's reported figures, the ROIC trend has remained consistently negative, reaching -1.6% in 2025Q2, which suggests that the company is currently destroying rather than compounding invested capital as it struggles to establish a viable business model.
The persistent negative returns on capital highlight the inefficiency of the firm's current spending relative to its lack of commercial output. Without a clear path to positive margins, these metrics suggest that additional capital injections may continue to yield diminishing returns for shareholders.
According to recent SEC filings, RMSG's current ratio has exhibited extreme instability, swinging from 0.05 in 2024Q3 to 23.63 in 2025Q2, a pattern that underscores the company's precarious reliance on erratic financing cycles to maintain its basic operational liquidity.
This volatility in liquidity ratios suggests that the company lacks a stable treasury management strategy, leaving it vulnerable to sudden operational shocks. The low absolute cash balance of $597,160 further implies that the firm may face significant difficulty meeting short-term obligations without immediate external support.
The most commonly misapplied metric for RMSG is the Price-to-Sales ratio, which obscures the company's lack of actual revenue generation and fails to account for the high probability of future shareholder dilution required to sustain the current burn rate.
Investors should instead focus on the 'Cash Burn Rate' and 'Monthly Active Agent' growth, as these metrics provide a more accurate picture of the company's survival prospects. Relying on traditional valuation multiples in the absence of revenue is misleading and ignores the fundamental risk of insolvency.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RMSG stock.
Real Messenger Corporation's current P/E ratio is -0.5x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Real Messenger Corporation is trading at a P/E of -0.5x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.