Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 35.7x · EV/EBITDA 10.8x · ROE 4.9%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $766M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $1.6B | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $1.5B | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.8B | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 35.66 | 54.50 | 78.81 | — | 44.46 | 171.11 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.35 | 3.64 | 5.12 | 4.91 | 6.54 | 10.43 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.65 | 2.68 | 3.92 | 2.79 | 2.99 | 3.97 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 7.95 | 59.81 | 15.72 | 25.68 | 21.56 | 32.14 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 33.33 | 47.11 | 15.03 | 24.88 | 21.05 | 32.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.90 | 6.04 | 6.07 | 7.99 | 11.68 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.81 | 15.98 | 20.54 | 28.82 | 22.41 | 24.74 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 17.41 | 21.07 | 27.44 | 78.27 | 35.27 | 67.91 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 80.50 | 18.54 | 31.73 | 26.34 | 35.97 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.7% | 51.7% | 47.6% | 36.2% | 52.5% | 63.6% | 63.6% | 72.5% | 71.6% | 80.1% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 22.0% | 20.4% | 8.7% | 21.9% | 26.8% | 12.9% | 28.5% | 33.0% | -10.2% | -0.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.6% | 6.6% | 6.3% | -3.0% | 14.7% | 7.2% | 35.3% | 26.6% | -8.9% | -33.2% | -0.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.9% | 4.9% | 4.6% | -1.7% | 7.0% | 4.7% | 49.7% | 39.8% | -14.2% | -16.1% | -8717.6% |
| ROA | 2.2% | 2.2% | 2.2% | -0.9% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 6.1% | 6.2% | -2.0% | -2.6% | -856.7% |
| ROIC | 6.8% | 6.8% | 6.7% | 2.2% | 5.0% | 6.5% | 2.5% | 10.4% | 17.7% | -0.9% | — |
| ROCE | 7.9% | 7.9% | 8.1% | 2.8% | 6.4% | 9.3% | 4.5% | 9.6% | 7.6% | -0.8% | -782.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.73 | 0.71 | 0.58 | 4.98 | 4.23 | 0.01 | 3.51 | 0.95 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.42 | 4.42 | 3.90 | 6.10 | 4.35 | 3.21 | 12.27 | 6.52 | 0.01 | 42.57 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.47 | 4.78 | 3.71 | -0.37 | 3.39 | -7.67 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.11 | 4.11 | 3.13 | 5.50 | 4.07 | 2.64 | 11.79 | 5.72 | -0.40 | 41.12 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 20.70 | 2.83 | 6.05 | 4.78 | 3.83 | 26.89 | 7.97 | -0.55 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.53 | 2.53 | 2.56 | 0.86 | 4.73 | 1.17 | 0.74 | 1.13 | — | -0.00 | -0.01 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.27 | 2.27 | 2.84 | 0.86 | 2.18 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 5.47 | 188.94 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.27 | 2.27 | 2.84 | 0.86 | 2.18 | 0.56 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 5.47 | -1622.27 | -328.93 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 1.01 | 0.23 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 4.82 | 6.22 | 0.94 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 5687.90 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 33.09 | 149.91 | 126.94 | 105.47 | 43.07 | 27.96 | 21.18 | 8.04 | 28.71 | 0.00 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.8% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 83.8% | 83.8% | 82.8% | — | 36.0% | 20330.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.8% | 1.8% | 1.3% | — | 2.2% | 0.6% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 12.6% | 1.7% | 6.4% | 3.9% | 4.6% | 3.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 7.3% | 5.2% | 4.5% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 8.9% | 6.7% | 5.5% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $110M | $120M | $116M | $122M | $112M | $117M | $117M | $65M | $35M | $16M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RPC stock.
Ridgepost Capital, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 35.7x. The historical average is 87.2x.
Ridgepost Capital, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 22.5x.
Ridgepost Capital, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.9%. The historical average is 5.5%.
Based on historical data, Ridgepost Capital, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 35.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Ridgepost Capital, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.53% with a payout ratio of 83.8%.
Ridgepost Capital, Inc. has 51.7% gross margin and 22.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Ridgepost Capital, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Accounting Consolidation Distorts Reality
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Valuation Disconnect Amidst Structural Flux
Based on reported figures, PX trades at a 47.19x TTM P/E, yet the forward P/E of 6.92 suggests that market participants are pricing in a massive, potentially anomalous, earnings expansion that warrants extreme caution given the lack of historical consistency in the firm's reported bottom-line performance.
The wide divergence between trailing and forward multiples implies that the market is either anticipating a transformative shift in profitability or is misinterpreting the impact of recent accounting consolidations. Investors should monitor whether this forward valuation reflects sustainable fee-related earnings or merely the inclusion of volatile, non-recurring items that may not repeat in future periods.
Capital Efficiency Remains Subdued Historically
As reported in financial statements, PX's ROIC has consistently languished in the low single digits, peaking at only 4.5% in 2025Q4, which suggests that the firm has struggled to generate meaningful returns on its invested capital despite an aggressive strategy of acquiring specialized boutique asset management platforms.
The persistent gap between PX's returns and those of more established peers like Hamilton Lane indicates that the firm has yet to achieve the operational scale necessary to drive superior capital compounding. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the integration of acquired entities is actually diluting the firm's overall return profile rather than enhancing it.
Asset Turnover Reflects Integration Challenges
According to recent SEC filings, PX's asset turnover ratio has remained remarkably low, hovering near 0.08 to 0.10, which indicates that the firm's massive asset base is not being efficiently utilized to generate revenue, likely due to the recent consolidation of fund-level assets onto the corporate balance sheet.
This low turnover ratio suggests that the firm's reported assets are largely non-operational or represent long-term investment holdings rather than active, revenue-generating capital. Analysts should be wary of interpreting this metric as a sign of operational efficiency, as it appears heavily distorted by the firm's unique accounting treatment of its managed vehicles.
Leverage Metrics Obscured by Consolidation
Based on reported figures, PX's debt-to-EBITDA ratio has shown extreme volatility, spiking to 24.41 in 2025Q3 before settling at 9.09 in 2025Q4, a fluctuation that suggests the firm's debt profile is heavily influenced by the consolidation of fund-level liabilities rather than purely corporate-level financing decisions.
The erratic nature of these leverage ratios makes it difficult to assess the true risk of the firm's capital structure. Investors should monitor whether this debt is truly recourse to the parent company or if it represents non-recourse fund debt that should be excluded when evaluating the firm's actual solvency and interest coverage capacity.
Misapplication of Standard P/E Multiples
The P/E ratio is frequently misapplied to PX, as reported net income is often distorted by non-cash stock-based compensation and the consolidation of fund-level accounting, which obscures the firm's true ability to generate recurring fee-related earnings from its underlying assets under management.
Instead of relying on P/E, analysts should focus on fee-related earnings (FRE) and distributable earnings, which provide a clearer picture of the firm's cash-generating potential. Using standard valuation multiples on GAAP net income for this business model likely leads to a fundamental misunderstanding of the firm's underlying economic reality and its true growth trajectory.