Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 68.3x · EV/EBITDA 28.0x · ROE 3.2%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $15.9B | $11.0B | $13.8B | $13.6B | $17.7B | $23.5B | $16.1B | $10.8B | $8.8B | $8.1B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $18.5B | $13.5B | $15.9B | $16.8B | $21.9B | $28.0B | $17.9B | $12.9B | $10.5B | $9.9B | $6.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 68.32 | 46.51 | 46.47 | — | 31.15 | 24.87 | 22.09 | 47.58 | 36.69 | 71.72 | 24.62 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.55 | 3.84 | 4.99 | 4.96 | 5.35 | 6.13 | 4.25 | 3.75 | 3.15 | 3.59 | 2.72 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.22 | 1.51 | 1.79 | 1.73 | 2.40 | 3.28 | 4.31 | 3.85 | 3.39 | 3.24 | 2.67 |
| P/FCF | 31.19 | 21.55 | 25.39 | 1377.54 | 29.84 | 17.71 | 19.41 | 38.37 | 40.23 | 32.51 | 18.04 |
| P/OCF | 27.25 | 18.83 | 21.89 | 149.48 | 26.08 | 16.63 | 18.03 | 29.79 | 28.17 | 28.10 | 16.41 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.74 | 5.78 | 6.11 | 6.60 | 7.32 | 4.73 | 4.47 | 3.78 | 4.39 | 3.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.00 | 20.56 | 18.99 | 20.20 | 18.10 | 16.96 | 14.14 | 20.81 | 19.02 | 24.19 | 15.88 |
| EV / EBIT | 51.73 | 37.59 | 38.60 | 59.60 | 28.93 | 21.46 | 18.72 | 42.86 | 32.31 | 29.09 | 22.55 |
| EV / FCF | — | 26.66 | 29.39 | 1695.81 | 36.80 | 21.15 | 21.61 | 45.69 | 48.17 | 39.74 | 20.19 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 53.1% | 48.0% | 48.1% | 53.2% | 59.6% | 52.6% | 44.8% | 45.0% | 45.6% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | 12.5% | 14.9% | 14.5% | 23.6% | 35.0% | 27.0% | 14.1% | 13.4% | 13.5% | 14.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.5% | 8.5% | 10.7% | -4.3% | 17.2% | 24.6% | 19.2% | 7.9% | 8.6% | 5.0% | 11.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.8% | -1.6% | 7.8% | 17.3% | 22.2% | 8.4% | 9.4% | 4.9% | 11.0% |
| ROA | 2.0% | 2.0% | 2.3% | -0.9% | 3.9% | 8.2% | 10.0% | 3.6% | 4.0% | 2.2% | 5.5% |
| ROIC | 2.7% | 2.7% | 3.0% | 2.7% | 5.0% | 11.7% | 14.7% | 6.6% | 6.5% | 6.4% | 8.0% |
| ROCE | 3.2% | 3.2% | 3.4% | 3.2% | 5.9% | 13.3% | 16.9% | 7.4% | 7.2% | 6.9% | 8.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.59 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.49 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.34 | 5.34 | 3.97 | 4.89 | 3.80 | 3.12 | 1.75 | 3.64 | 3.43 | 4.90 | 2.58 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.49 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.32 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.94 | 3.94 | 2.58 | 3.79 | 3.43 | 2.76 | 1.44 | 3.33 | 3.14 | 4.40 | 1.69 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.11 | 3.99 | 318.27 | 6.97 | 3.44 | 2.19 | 7.32 | 7.94 | 7.23 | 2.15 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.91 | 3.91 | 4.28 | 2.85 | 7.27 | 12.79 | 19.23 | 4.73 | 4.85 | 7.75 | 6.88 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.68 | 1.68 | 3.60 | 2.07 | 2.13 | 2.01 | 1.36 | 1.80 | 1.60 | 1.26 | 1.97 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.40 | 1.40 | 3.03 | 1.77 | 1.87 | 1.66 | 1.04 | 1.33 | 1.16 | 0.89 | 1.56 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.69 | 0.69 | 1.78 | 1.11 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.37 | 0.49 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.53 | 3.53 | 3.90 | 3.34 | 3.83 | 3.63 | 3.48 | 4.46 | 4.51 | 3.49 | 4.63 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 95.17 | 83.78 | 83.97 | 67.54 | 67.51 | 111.46 | 91.79 | 83.13 | 89.32 | 73.43 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 13.6% | 13.6% | 11.6% | — | 6.2% | 3.4% | 4.3% | 13.6% | 13.0% | 27.2% | 13.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.5% | 2.1% | 2.2% | — | 3.2% | 4.0% | 4.5% | 2.1% | 2.7% | 1.4% | 4.1% |
| FCF Yield | 3.2% | 4.6% | 3.9% | 0.1% | 3.4% | 5.6% | 5.2% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 3.1% | 5.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.2% | 7.5% | 2.7% | 2.9% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 2.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.4% | 7.8% | 2.9% | 3.1% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 0.4% | 3.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $113M | $123M | $125M | $126M | $117M | $112M | $112M | $112M | $111M | $110M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RVTY stock.
Revvity, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 68.3x. The historical average is 34.3x. This places it at the 96th percentile of its historical range.
Revvity, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 28.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.9x.
Revvity, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 3.2%. The historical average is 8.5%.
Based on historical data, Revvity, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 68.3x. This is at the 96th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Revvity, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.20% with a payout ratio of 13.6%.
Revvity, Inc. has 53.1% gross margin and 12.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Revvity, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
China birth rate decline
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Amid Transformation
Gross margin improved to 57.1% in Q2 2026 from 54.5% a year earlier, while operating margin remained near 12%, reflecting cost pressures from integration, as per recent filings.
The gross margin uptick suggests a favorable mix shift toward higher-margin reagents and services, but operating margin has been range-bound between 10.7% and 14.5% over the past year, indicating that SG&A escalation and integration costs are absorbing some of the gross margin gains. Net margin volatility, swinging from 4.3% to 13.7% quarterly, underscores the impact of non-operating items and one-time charges, making operating margin a more reliable gauge of underlying earning power. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin expansion can translate into operating leverage as the post-divestiture cost structure stabilizes.
Capital Returns Constrained by Intangibles
ROIC has remained below 1% for the last ten quarters, with Q2 2026 at 0.7%, reflecting the heavy goodwill from the BioLegend acquisition, as reported in financial statements.
Despite a healthy gross margin and strong cash flow, ROIC is depressed because the capital base is inflated by $6.6 billion in goodwill, representing over half of total assets. The low asset turnover of 0.06x further compounds the issue, as revenue generation per dollar of assets is minimal. This suggests that the company is not yet generating sufficient returns on its acquisition-driven capital, and the market's forward EV/EBITDA of 17.5x implies expectations for meaningful improvement. If BioLegend's growth accelerates, ROIC could rise, but the current figures indicate a period of capital deployment digestion.
Working Capital Drag from Inventory Buildup
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 150 days in Q2 2026 from 138 days a year earlier, driven by higher DIO of 111 days, as per quarterly data.
The increase in days inventory outstanding suggests either deliberate stockpiling ahead of anticipated demand or slower inventory turnover, which ties up cash and reduces efficiency. DSO improved to 87 days from 99 days in the prior quarter, indicating better receivables collection, but the overall CCC remains elevated relative to the prior year. This working capital drag partially offsets the strong FCF margin of 24.8%, and investors should watch whether inventory levels normalize or if this reflects a strategic shift in supply chain management.
Leverage Eases but Coverage Remains Thin
Debt-to-equity improved to 0.46 in Q2 2026 from 0.51 a year earlier, yet interest coverage of 3.76x remains modest, as per balance sheet data.
The reduction in total debt by $700 million over the past year demonstrates a deleveraging trend, but the interest coverage ratio, while improved from 2.42x in Q1 2024, is still below the 5x level seen in late 2024. This suggests that earnings before interest and taxes are only about 3.8 times interest expense, leaving limited cushion if rates rise or operating income dips. The D/EBITDA ratio of 17.46x is elevated, though this is distorted by the low EBITDA base; normalized EBITDA would likely show a more comfortable leverage profile. Investors should monitor the pace of debt reduction and the trajectory of operating income to ensure coverage continues to strengthen.
Liquidity Normalizes to Adequate Levels
Current ratio fell to 1.80 in Q2 2026 from 3.60 in Q4 2024, while cash stood at $1.0 billion, indicating a leaner but still adequate buffer, as per recent filings.
The decline in the current ratio reflects a more efficient deployment of working capital, but the quick ratio of 1.50 suggests that even without inventory, current assets cover current liabilities comfortably. The $1.0 billion cash position provides a cushion against short-term disruptions, though it is lower than the peak levels seen in 2024. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged biopharma downturn, the company could rely on its cash and undrawn credit facilities, but the reduced liquidity buffer warrants monitoring given the ongoing integration and potential for acquisition-related outlays.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Intangible-Heavy Model
EV/EBITDA of 23.8x appears rich, but it ignores the high amortization from BioLegend, which depresses EBITDA and inflates the multiple, as per reported figures.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for RVTY is EV/EBITDA, because the company's significant intangible amortization—stemming from the BioLegend acquisition—reduces EBITDA, making the multiple appear higher than the underlying cash-generating ability. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDAR or EV/operating cash flow, which adds back amortization and better reflects the recurring cash earnings power. For instance, the P/FCF of 25.8x provides a clearer picture of valuation relative to cash generation, and the forward EV/EBITDA of 17.5x suggests the market is already normalizing for this distortion. Investors should adjust for amortization when comparing RVTY to peers like Waters or Bruker, which have different capital structures and acquisition histories.