Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.4x · EV/EBITDA 5.2x · ROE 11.2%. (2022–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $16M | $41M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $15M | $36M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.41 | 6.09 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.90 | 0.55 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.01 | 0.40 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 4.26 | 2.63 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.49 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.19 | 3.06 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 7.47 | 4.42 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 22.3% | 23.4% | 27.9% | 38.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 11.2% | 18.2% | 20.8% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.1% | 9.1% | 13.3% | 15.3% | 19.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 11.2% | 11.2% | 50.2% | 49.4% | 31.3% |
| ROA | 9.3% | 9.3% | 28.5% | 26.2% | 19.2% |
| ROIC | 10.4% | 10.4% | 41.8% | 39.9% | 25.9% |
| ROCE | 12.7% | 12.7% | 55.1% | 53.7% | 35.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.41 | 0.21 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.31 | 0.53 | 0.36 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.04 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 0.18 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.38 | -0.38 | 0.27 | 0.43 | 0.31 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 3.51 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 35.18 | 35.18 | 37.38 | 37.62 | 89.16 |
Net cash position: cash ($11M) exceeds total debt ($6M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.83 | 2.83 | 2.01 | 1.29 | 0.78 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.83 | 2.83 | 2.01 | 1.29 | 0.78 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 1.90 | 1.37 | 1.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 50.28 | 73.70 | 80.91 | 62.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.5% | 16.4% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $20M | $13M | $13M | $11M |
Hardware-heavy margin compression
Based on reported figures, SAGT trades at a P/S ratio of 0.90, which appears to reflect a significant discount compared to pure-play software peers, likely due to the market's skepticism regarding the scalability of its hardware-heavy revenue model within the Malaysian F&B technology sector.
The current EV/EBITDA multiple of 5.19 suggests that investors are pricing the company as a low-growth industrial service provider rather than a high-margin software entity. This valuation appears to account for the inherent risks of physical asset deployment and the lack of consistent, high-margin recurring revenue streams.
As reported in financial statements, SAGT's ROIC plummeted to 0.8% in 2025Q4 from a peak of 37.8% in 2023Q4, indicating that the company's aggressive deployment of capital into physical hardware assets is failing to generate the compounding returns observed in earlier, software-focused periods of operation.
The sharp decline in return on capital suggests that the marginal utility of each additional kiosk or charging station is diminishing rapidly. Investors should monitor whether this trend represents a structural shift toward lower-return hardware operations or merely a temporary drag caused by the recent, heavy capital expenditure cycle.
According to quarterly data, SAGT's DSO fluctuated significantly, reaching 45 days in 2025Q4 after peaking at 120 days in 2025Q3, which suggests that the company's ability to collect payments from its SME client base remains highly inconsistent and sensitive to localized economic conditions.
The volatility in receivables turnover implies that the company lacks strong leverage over its merchant customers, potentially forcing it to offer extended payment terms to maintain market share. This inconsistency in the cash conversion cycle complicates liquidity planning and highlights the operational risks inherent in the Malaysian F&B micro-climate.
Based on the most recent filings, SAGT maintains a current ratio of 2.83, which appears healthy on the surface, yet this liquidity position is heavily dependent on inventory and hardware assets that may not be easily liquidated under severe financial stress in the Malaysian market.
While the company's low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.06% provides a defensive cushion, the reliance on physical inventory for liquidity suggests that the balance sheet is less robust than the headline ratios imply. Investors should be wary of the potential for rapid liquidity erosion if hardware demand stalls.
As reported in financial statements, the market's tendency to apply standard SaaS valuation multiples to SAGT is fundamentally flawed, as the company's 22.33% gross margin profile is more characteristic of a business services firm than a high-margin, scalable software-as-a-service provider.
Using P/S or P/E ratios without adjusting for the high hardware-related COGS obscures the reality that SAGT's growth is linear rather than exponential. Analysts should instead focus on metrics like hardware-adjusted EBITDA or return on invested capital to better capture the true economic performance of the business.
Includes 30+ ratios · 4 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SAGT stock.
SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd's current P/E ratio is 15.4x. The historical average is 6.1x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd's current EV/EBITDA is 5.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 3.1x.
SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd's return on equity (ROE) is 11.2%. The historical average is 35.5%.
Based on historical data, SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd is trading at a P/E of 15.4x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd has 22.3% gross margin and 11.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
SAGTEC GLOBAL Ltd's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.