Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.2x · EV/EBITDA 6.4x · ROE 15.4%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.0B | $3.8B | $2.6B | $5.4B | $4.3B | $5.4B | $2.1B | $1.3B | $1.3B | $3.7B | $6.0B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.3B | $4.2B | $3.2B | $5.2B | $4.5B | $5.4B | $2.6B | $3.3B | $1.9B | $4.2B | $7.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.19 | 13.03 | — | 6.63 | 11.45 | 6.99 | — | 17.36 | — | 7.11 | 10.97 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.75 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.40 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.59 | 0.93 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.13 | 1.95 | 1.41 | 1.90 | 1.93 | 2.43 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.19 | 1.92 |
| P/FCF | 7.52 | 7.31 | 5.96 | 12.75 | 6.54 | 4.77 | 1.64 | 3.00 | 2.36 | 2.17 | 14.88 |
| P/OCF | 5.82 | 5.65 | 4.42 | 9.82 | 5.40 | 4.28 | 1.54 | 2.27 | 1.91 | 1.90 | 8.78 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.61 | 0.48 | 0.73 | 0.57 | 0.69 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.30 | 0.67 | 1.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.39 | 6.22 | 12.31 | 6.68 | 4.34 | 5.08 | 8.07 | 5.73 | — | 5.37 | 7.64 |
| EV / EBIT | 8.18 | 7.97 | 6.34 | 8.34 | 5.17 | 6.01 | — | 19.80 | — | 7.25 | 9.55 |
| EV / FCF | — | 7.96 | 7.28 | 12.43 | 6.79 | 4.80 | 2.03 | 7.80 | 3.31 | 2.47 | 18.16 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 39.6% | 39.2% | 39.4% | 38.9% | 39.9% | 33.1% | 36.2% | 34.6% | 35.0% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 7.7% | 1.7% | 8.7% | 11.0% | 11.5% | 2.8% | 6.4% | -12.2% | 9.3% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.3% | 4.3% | 0.9% | 11.3% | 4.8% | 9.8% | -0.3% | 1.7% | -10.5% | 8.3% | 8.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.4% | 15.4% | 2.6% | 32.1% | 16.9% | 38.0% | -0.8% | 5.8% | -26.7% | 16.7% | 17.6% |
| ROA | 5.0% | 5.0% | 1.0% | 12.1% | 5.7% | 12.1% | -0.2% | 2.0% | -12.8% | 8.4% | 8.3% |
| ROIC | 16.6% | 16.6% | 3.2% | 18.3% | 28.0% | 29.6% | 3.6% | 9.5% | -19.2% | 10.8% | 13.1% |
| ROCE | 13.2% | 13.2% | 2.5% | 13.5% | 19.5% | 20.8% | 3.3% | 9.8% | -18.7% | 11.4% | 14.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.91 | 1.30 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.45 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.81 | 1.81 | 4.56 | 1.59 | 1.29 | 1.36 | 5.17 | 4.18 | — | 0.94 | 1.48 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.17 | 0.31 | -0.05 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 1.09 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.42 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.51 | 0.51 | 2.22 | -0.17 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 1.54 | 3.52 | — | 0.65 | 1.38 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.65 | 1.32 | -0.32 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.39 | 4.80 | 0.94 | 0.30 | 3.27 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | 64.13 | 53.33 | -1.80 | 4.64 | -19.17 | 11.00 | 15.40 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.48 | 1.79 | 1.56 | 1.80 | 1.79 | 1.91 | 2.76 | 3.32 | 3.86 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.71 | 1.71 | 0.42 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 1.12 | 1.82 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.05 | 1.18 | 1.19 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 1.41 | 1.07 | 0.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 2.11 | 2.24 | 2.23 | 2.28 | 1.72 | 1.68 | 1.71 | 1.78 | 1.65 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 0.85 | 5.84 | 2.42 | 5.71 | 45.66 | 111.54 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% | 1.4% | 1.9% | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 6.1% | 5.9% | 2.1% | 1.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 17.6% | 17.6% | 79.4% | 4.9% | 9.7% | 2.5% | — | 73.4% | — | 14.7% | 13.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.0% | 7.7% | — | 15.1% | 8.7% | 14.3% | — | 5.8% | — | 14.1% | 9.1% |
| FCF Yield | 13.3% | 13.7% | 16.8% | 7.8% | 15.3% | 21.0% | 61.0% | 33.3% | 42.3% | 46.1% | 6.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.2% | 5.3% | 36.4% | 2.6% | 8.7% | 5.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 36.4% | 12.5% | 16.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.4% | 6.7% | 38.3% | 3.3% | 9.6% | 6.1% | 0.9% | 6.1% | 42.3% | 14.5% | 18.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $42M | $44M | $54M | $57M | $63M | $52M | $52M | $55M | $70M | $77M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SIG stock.
Signet Jewelers Limited's current P/E ratio is 14.2x. The historical average is 18.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Signet Jewelers Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 6.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 9.4x.
Signet Jewelers Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 15.4%. The historical average is 12.8%.
Based on historical data, Signet Jewelers Limited is trading at a P/E of 14.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Signet Jewelers Limited's current dividend yield is 1.24% with a payout ratio of 17.6%.
Signet Jewelers Limited has 39.6% gross margin and 7.7% operating margin.
Signet Jewelers Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.8x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Consumer discretionary spending sensitivity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Cyclical Discount Likely Overdone
Based on current multiples, Signet trades at a forward P/E of 10.58, a significant discount to historical norms and implying deeply pessimistic earnings growth expectations that may not fully reflect the ongoing recovery in its bridal segment.
The forward EV/EBITDA of 6.62 is also depressed, suggesting the market is pricing in cyclicality and margin headwinds like lab-grown diamond deflation. However, this valuation appears to underappreciate the improving engagement rate tailwinds and the company's disciplined cost structure, which has supported gross margin resilience. Compared to the peer Birkenstock, which trades at a 14.35 P/E, Signet's discount seems excessive for a company demonstrating similar profitability metrics and a stronger balance sheet.
Gross Margin Resilience Amid Operating Leverage
As reported in Q2 2027 financial statements, gross margin expanded to 39.4%, indicating effective pricing power and mix management, yet the resulting operating margin of 7.1% remains highly sensitive to revenue volume due to the fixed-cost retail footprint.
The gross margin improvement to 39.4% from 38.6% a year prior suggests successful navigation of raw material costs and product mix shifts, potentially aided by the growing ASP in fine jewelry. However, the substantial swing in quarterly operating profitability, from near break-even in some periods to over 18% in peak quarters, underscores the operating leverage risk. The net margin of 3.4% in the latest quarter is a positive inflection from prior losses, but its sustainability depends on maintaining SG&A discipline and managing the high seasonal volatility in cash conversion.
Adequate Buffer Amid Seasonal Cash Swings
The current ratio of 1.64 and quick ratio of 0.46 for Q2 2027, according to SEC filings, indicate a solid working capital position, though the significant gap between them highlights a persistent and heavy reliance on inventory as the primary source of liquidity.
The substantial difference between the current and quick ratios is a structural feature of the jewelry retail model, where inventory represents a large portion of current assets. While the current ratio has remained consistently above 1.50, providing an adequate buffer, the quick ratio's low level indicates that severe stress or inventory obsolescence (e.g., from a rapid shift in diamond preferences) could strain short-term liquidity. The seasonal buildup of inventory, peaking at over 200 days in certain quarters, amplifies this risk, though it is managed through predictable holiday sales cycles.
Working Capital Driven by Seasonal Inventory Build
Based on recent financial statements, Signet's cash conversion cycle has swung dramatically from as low as 15 days to as high as 157 days over the past ten quarters, a pattern almost entirely driven by massive seasonal fluctuations in days inventory outstanding.
The extreme volatility in the CCC, primarily driven by DIO swings (e.g., from 63 days in Q4 2026 to 217 days in Q3 2025), reveals the critical importance of the holiday sales season in converting inventory to cash. This pattern suggests management has mastered the procurement and stocking cycle but is also exposed to significant risk if consumer demand disappoints during peak periods. The consistently low days sales outstanding (DSO) of 1-3 days reflects efficient cash collection from consumers, providing a stable counterpoint to the inventory volatility.
The P/E Multiple Misleads on Retail Earnings Power
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Signet appears to be the trailing P/E of 14.16, which obscures the extreme seasonality and cyclicality of its earnings by treating a single quarter's results as representative of annual profitability.
Using a trailing P/E is misleading because Signet's quarterly net income fluctuates wildly, from losses in off-peak quarters to massive profits in Q4. A more appropriate metric for valuation is the forward EV/EBITDA or an analysis based on normalized, full-cycle earnings, as these better capture the recurring operating profitability of the asset-light digital shift and the long-term cash flow generation of its service plans. Investors relying solely on the P/E may misinterpret a low trough-quarter P/E as cheapness or a high peak-quarter P/E as overvaluation, missing the underlying business trajectory.