Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 21.4x · EV/EBITDA 12.5x · ROE N/A. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.1B | $3.3B | $4.9B | $2.9B | $2.4B | $8.4B | $8.7B | $5.7B | $4.5B | $5.9B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $5.4B | $5.7B | $7.4B | $5.8B | $5.6B | $10.7B | $10.4B | $7.4B | $6.5B | $7.1B | $6.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 21.39 | 23.06 | — | — | — | 16.33 | 22.45 | 12.45 | 70.29 | 26.82 | 16.36 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.90 | 0.98 | 1.39 | 0.81 | 0.60 | 1.70 | 2.11 | 1.82 | 1.69 | 2.22 | 1.82 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | 16.06 | 8.26 | 12.38 | 7.88 | 12.33 | 8.69 | 6.89 |
| P/FCF | 11.22 | 12.21 | 8.44 | 6.60 | — | 50.86 | 17.57 | 31.09 | 16.39 | 20.60 | 28.83 |
| P/OCF | 8.28 | 9.00 | 7.38 | 5.45 | — | 30.84 | 15.59 | 25.28 | 13.13 | 16.55 | 21.75 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.67 | 2.07 | 1.62 | 1.42 | 2.18 | 2.51 | 2.33 | 2.43 | 2.70 | 2.27 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.49 | 13.11 | 25.47 | — | — | 13.13 | 15.25 | 9.44 | 22.95 | 13.91 | 12.07 |
| EV / EBIT | 15.11 | 16.22 | 54.52 | — | — | 14.18 | 17.56 | 10.78 | 32.05 | 18.26 | 14.39 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.76 | 12.63 | 13.16 | — | 65.15 | 20.93 | 39.94 | 23.62 | 25.11 | 35.89 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 30.6% | 30.6% | 23.9% | 18.5% | 22.2% | 29.8% | 32.6% | 32.3% | 32.5% | 36.8% | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 10.5% | 5.9% | -4.9% | -11.1% | 14.7% | 14.2% | 21.9% | 7.5% | 16.4% | 16.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 4.3% | 4.3% | -1.0% | -10.7% | -11.1% | 10.4% | 9.4% | 14.6% | 2.4% | 8.3% | 11.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | -75.4% | 59.7% | 54.2% | 84.4% | 12.3% | 30.7% | 45.9% |
| ROA | 5.2% | 5.2% | -1.1% | -9.9% | -9.6% | 12.5% | 12.1% | 15.1% | 2.2% | 7.9% | 12.0% |
| ROIC | 13.3% | 13.3% | 6.7% | -4.4% | -9.7% | 18.9% | 18.6% | 22.0% | 6.9% | 16.4% | 18.4% |
| ROCE | 17.4% | 17.4% | 8.8% | -5.8% | -12.4% | 23.7% | 24.2% | 28.5% | 8.6% | 19.6% | 22.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | 22.14 | 2.56 | 2.39 | 2.27 | 5.53 | 2.08 | 1.76 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.49 | 5.49 | 8.70 | — | — | 3.18 | 2.47 | 2.12 | 7.14 | 2.73 | 2.47 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | 21.55 | 2.32 | 2.37 | 2.24 | 5.44 | 1.90 | 1.69 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.40 | 5.40 | 8.45 | — | — | 2.88 | 2.45 | 2.09 | 7.02 | 2.49 | 2.38 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.56 | 4.19 | 6.56 | — | 14.28 | 3.36 | 8.85 | 7.23 | 4.50 | 7.07 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.72 | 2.72 | 0.85 | -1.55 | -3.73 | 9.58 | 6.70 | 6.71 | 2.34 | 5.26 | 7.71 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.27 | 1.27 | 1.31 | 1.81 | 2.06 | 1.77 | 1.28 | 1.68 | 1.45 | 1.62 | 1.66 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.79 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.87 | 0.90 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.24 | 1.24 | 1.04 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 1.22 | 1.04 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 1.01 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.60 | 3.29 | 2.27 | 3.07 | 4.48 | 3.95 | 3.74 | 4.10 | 4.11 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 19.99 | 18.16 | 31.27 | 27.81 | 35.83 | 41.95 | 35.67 | 42.55 | 39.59 | 38.83 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 5.0% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 5.2% | 7.0% | 1.7% | 4.7% | 2.2% | 2.7% | 2.1% | 2.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 106.3% | 106.3% | — | — | — | 27.9% | 106.1% | 27.0% | 188.4% | 55.1% | 36.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.7% | 4.3% | — | — | — | 6.1% | 4.5% | 8.0% | 1.4% | 3.7% | 6.1% |
| FCF Yield | 8.9% | 8.2% | 11.8% | 15.1% | — | 2.0% | 5.7% | 3.2% | 6.1% | 4.9% | 3.5% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 10.9% | 1.5% | 0.6% | 0.1% | 7.3% | 4.4% | 2.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.6% | 5.2% | 3.2% | 5.5% | 17.9% | 3.3% | 5.3% | 2.2% | 10.0% | 6.4% | 4.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $59M | $57M | $56M | $56M | $57M | $57M | $56M | $57M | $60M | $62M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SMG stock.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company's current P/E ratio is 21.4x. The historical average is 24.4x. This places it at the 52th percentile of its historical range.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company's current EV/EBITDA is 12.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.7x.
Based on historical data, The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is trading at a P/E of 21.4x. This is at the 52th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company's current dividend yield is 4.98% with a payout ratio of 106.3%.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company has 30.6% gross margin and 10.5% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Hawthorne volatility and leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masked by Seasonality
Gross margin improved to 31.2% in Q3 2026 from 29.5% a year earlier, but remains below the 41.8% peak in Q2 2026, per reported quarterly data, indicating a structural ceiling.
The sequential drop from Q2's 41.8% to Q3's 31.2% underscores the extreme seasonality of the lawn care business, where Q2 captures the bulk of spring sales. Operating margin swung from 28.2% in Q2 to 14.5% in Q3, reflecting fixed SG&A costs spread over a smaller revenue base. While the year-over-year gross margin improvement suggests some pricing power or cost relief, the persistent gap from the Q2 peak implies that the business cannot sustain peak profitability outside the spring window. Investors should monitor whether the Q3 margin erosion is purely seasonal or signals a loss of pricing discipline.
ROIC Swings with Seasonal Working Capital
ROIC swung from -7.9% in Q4 2024 to 15.1% in Q2 2026, per reported figures, reflecting extreme seasonality and the impact of negative equity on capital base calculations.
The ten-quarter ROIC range of -7.9% to 15.1% illustrates how seasonal working capital swings distort annualized returns. The negative equity position, which has persisted for ten consecutive quarters, complicates the interpretation of ROIC, as the denominator is artificially small or negative. The Q2 2026 ROIC of 15.1% appears to be a seasonal peak, not a sustainable run-rate, given the Q3 2026 drop to 6.5%. This suggests that the company's capital efficiency is heavily dependent on the timing of inventory builds and receivables collection, and that the underlying return on invested capital may be more moderate than the peak implies.
Working Capital Cycle Stretched by Seasonality
Cash conversion cycle peaked at 201 days in Q1 2026, per reported data, driven by DIO of 238 days, before normalizing to 85 days in Q3 2026, reflecting seasonal inventory build.
The CCC swings from 201 days in Q1 to 85 days in Q3 highlight the massive inventory build ahead of spring, with DIO reaching 238 days in Q1 2026. This pattern is typical for the lawn care industry, but the magnitude of the swing suggests that SMG's working capital management is heavily dependent on accurate demand forecasting. The DPO of 39 days in Q3 2026 is relatively stable, indicating that SMG does not have significant supplier leverage to offset its inventory holding period. The efficiency of the business is therefore tied to its ability to sell through inventory quickly in Q2 and Q3, which is a function of weather and consumer discretionary spending.
Debt Burden Intensifies as EBITDA Normalizes
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 12.41x in Q3 2026 from 5.49x in Q2 2026, per reported figures, as EBITDA contracted seasonally, while interest coverage fell to 5.57x from 12.66x.
The sequential deterioration in leverage metrics is largely seasonal, but the absolute level of debt-to-EBITDA at 12.41x in Q3 2026 is concerning, even for a seasonal business. Interest coverage of 5.57x in Q3 2026, down from 12.66x in Q2, indicates that debt service is becoming less comfortable as EBITDA normalizes. The company's negative equity position amplifies the risk, as it limits financial flexibility. While the Q2 2026 metrics were healthier, the trend suggests that SMG's leverage is a persistent strain, and any prolonged weakness in the Hawthorne segment or core demand could push coverage below comfortable levels.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Despite Seasonal Improvement
Current ratio improved to 1.21 in Q3 2026 from 1.27 in Q2, per balance sheet data, but cash of $27.7M is minimal relative to total debt of $2.1B, indicating a tight liquidity position.
The current ratio of 1.21 in Q3 2026 is below the 1.61 seen in Q3 2025, suggesting a weakening liquidity position year-over-year. The quick ratio of 0.78 in Q3 2026 indicates that inventory is a significant component of current assets, and in a downturn, inventory may not be easily converted to cash. With cash of only $27.7M against $2.1B in debt, the company appears to rely on revolving credit facilities and ongoing cash flow to meet obligations. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged demand slump or a spike in interest rates, the liquidity buffer may prove inadequate, warranting close monitoring of covenant compliance.
Misapplied Metric: Debt-to-EBITDA
Debt-to-EBITDA is commonly misapplied to SMG due to extreme seasonality, as reported figures show it swinging from 5.49x in Q2 2026 to 12.41x in Q3 2026, obscuring the true leverage trend.
For a highly seasonal business like SMG, a single-quarter debt-to-EBITDA ratio is misleading because EBITDA is not annualized and can be near zero in off-peak quarters. The ratio's volatility—from 5.49x to 12.41x within one quarter—makes it an unreliable gauge of credit risk. Instead, investors should use a trailing twelve-month (TTM) EBITDA or an average EBITDA over a full seasonal cycle to smooth out the swings. Additionally, given the negative equity, debt-to-equity ratios are not meaningful; a more appropriate metric would be debt-to-total capitalization or net debt to TTM EBITDA, which would provide a more stable view of the company's leverage.