Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24M | $33M | $68M | $44M | $54M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $24M | $33M | $68M | $44M | $62M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.86 | — | 37.35 | — | 56.98 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.81 | 0.73 | 0.73 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 16.41 | 15.84 | 5.78 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 95.22 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 95.22 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.41 | 0.81 | 0.72 | 0.84 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 16.27 | — | 9.41 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | 21.48 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 94.52 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | 27.3% | 35.8% | 20.0% | 28.6% | 40.3% | 46.1% | 9.5% |
| Operating Margin | -19.4% | -19.4% | 4.6% | -16.9% | -2.2% | 7.8% | 24.0% | -18.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -33.5% | -33.5% | 2.2% | -14.9% | 1.3% | 7.9% | 24.6% | -16.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | 52.6% | -149.4% | 9.8% | 38.2% | 89.4% | — |
| ROA | -0.1% | -0.1% | 2.4% | -11.1% | 1.2% | 8.3% | 24.8% | — |
| ROIC | — | — | 88.8% | -77.2% | -6.7% | 28.8% | 76.1% | — |
| ROCE | -0.3% | -0.3% | 17.1% | -50.5% | -6.7% | 19.6% | 51.4% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 1.73 | 5.31 | 2.35 | 1.85 | 0.52 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.72 | — | 3.33 | 0.77 | 0.40 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | -0.02 | -0.12 | 0.87 | 0.84 | -0.28 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | -0.02 | — | 1.23 | 0.35 | -0.22 | 0.00 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | -0.70 | — | 0.78 | -0.20 | 0.00 |
| Interest Coverage | -23.83 | -23.83 | 4.40 | -6.50 | -0.57 | 23.87 | 65.46 | -10.60 |
Net cash position: cash ($7M) exceeds total debt ($7M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.94 | — |
| Quick Ratio | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.94 | — |
| Cash Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.42 | — |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.00 | 1.36 | 0.67 | 1.02 | 1.33 | 1.01 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 61.18 | 55.34 | 151.26 | 89.25 | 71.42 | 66.19 | 100.56 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | 15.2% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | 865.2% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 2.7% | — | 1.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 1.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 6.3% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 21.5% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $37M | $37M | $37M | $37M | $37M | $37M | $37M |
Liquidity and solvency strain
Based on reported figures, SNAL trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 0.28, which suggests that the market is heavily discounting the company's future revenue potential due to persistent negative earnings and the lack of a clear, sustainable path toward profitability in the current gaming landscape.
The negative P/E ratio of -0.82 underscores the company's inability to generate consistent bottom-line results, rendering traditional earnings-based valuation metrics largely irrelevant. Investors appear to be pricing the stock as a distressed asset, reflecting deep uncertainty regarding the company's ability to monetize its existing IP portfolio effectively.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC has experienced extreme volatility, including a -77.0% reading in 2025Q1, indicating that capital allocation decisions have failed to generate value and have instead contributed to the erosion of the firm's overall economic foundation over the observed period.
The erratic nature of these returns suggests that the company is struggling to deploy capital into projects that yield returns exceeding the cost of funding. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current development cycle is fundamentally incapable of producing high-margin outcomes compared to industry peers.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's DPO has fluctuated significantly, reaching as high as 234 days in 2024Q1, which suggests that the firm may be relying on extended payment terms to suppliers to manage its precarious cash position rather than operational efficiency.
The high variability in DSO and DPO metrics implies that the company lacks a stable working capital rhythm, which is typical for firms experiencing significant revenue lulls. This reliance on supplier leverage may indicate a lack of bargaining power or a desperate attempt to preserve liquidity during periods of low cash inflow.
Based on the company's reported figures, the current ratio has consistently remained below 1.0, hovering between 0.53 and 0.86 over the last ten quarters, which indicates that the firm lacks sufficient liquid assets to comfortably cover its short-term obligations without external support or asset liquidation.
This persistent liquidity shortfall suggests that the company is operating with a very narrow margin for error, leaving it highly vulnerable to any unexpected operational disruptions. Investors should monitor the cash balance closely, as the current trajectory may necessitate dilutive financing to maintain basic business continuity.
As indicated by the company's financial statements, the P/S ratio is frequently misapplied by analysts to value SNAL, as it obscures the underlying reality that a significant portion of revenue is consumed by high platform fees and amortization, rendering top-line growth a poor proxy for value.
Instead of relying on P/S, analysts should focus on free cash flow margins and the change in deferred revenue to better understand the company's true cash-generating capacity. Using revenue as a primary valuation anchor ignores the structural cost burdens that currently prevent the firm from achieving sustainable profitability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SNAL stock.
Snail, Inc. Class A Common Stock's current P/E ratio is -0.9x. The historical average is 47.2x.
Based on historical data, Snail, Inc. Class A Common Stock is trading at a P/E of -0.9x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Snail, Inc. Class A Common Stock has 27.3% gross margin and -19.4% operating margin.