Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -89.3%. (2020–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $361M | $886M | $2.0B | $506M | $361M | $349M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $1.7B | $2.6B | $520M | $363M | $350M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.68 | — | — | — | — | 81.00 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.35 | 1.66 | 5.32 | 1.49 | 1.33 | 1.27 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 81.90 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | 81.90 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -89.3% | -89.3% | -174.0% | -30.7% | -0.9% | 3.1% | -7.1% |
| ROA | -24.7% | -24.7% | -54.8% | -18.7% | -0.9% | 3.0% | -0.5% |
| ROIC | -26.5% | -26.5% | -39.4% | -22.6% | -1.7% | -0.9% | — |
| ROCE | -37.5% | -37.5% | -31.4% | -19.3% | -2.2% | -1.2% | — |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.77 | 1.77 | 2.22 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 0.22 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.58 | 1.43 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | 0.15 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.52 | -3.52 | -8.35 | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.13 | 0.13 | 2.94 | 0.91 | 0.03 | 0.69 | 1.08 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.12 | 0.12 | 2.82 | — | 0.03 | 0.69 | 1.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 2.49 | — | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.88 | 1.30 | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 1.2% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 45.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 45.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $98M | $89M | $44M | $36M | $36M | $3M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 6 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SOC stock.
Sable Offshore Corp.'s current P/E ratio is -0.7x. The historical average is 81.0x.
Sable Offshore Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is -89.3%. The historical average is -49.8%.
Based on historical data, Sable Offshore Corp. is trading at a P/E of -0.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory delay and cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Liquidity Crunch Nears Critical Low
According to reported financials, SOC's current ratio fell to 0.24 in 2026Q2 from 2.94 in 2024Q4, with cash at $21.6M, indicating a severe liquidity crunch ahead of restart.
The current ratio of 0.24 in 2026Q2, down from 2.94 in 2024Q4, reflects a dramatic deterioration in short-term solvency as cash reserves were consumed by restart capex and operating losses. With quick ratio at 0.21, the company holds minimal liquid assets to cover near-term obligations, suggesting that any further regulatory delay could force dilutive financing or asset sales. The liquidity position appears vulnerable to stress, as the cash balance of $21.6M is insufficient to sustain the quarterly burn rate observed in prior periods.
Debt Load Pressures Restart Economics
As reported in financial statements, SOC's debt-to-equity ratio reached 2.45 in 2026Q2, up from 2.22 in 2024Q4, while interest coverage remained at 0.14, indicating strained debt service capacity.
The D/E ratio of 2.45 in 2026Q2, compared to peers like CIVI at 0.68, highlights SOC's aggressive leverage, which appears necessary to fund the SYU restart but raises refinancing risk. Interest coverage of 0.14 in 2026Q2, though improved from negative levels in prior quarters, remains far below the 1.0 threshold, suggesting that operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses even after first oil. The debt load of $968.8M, per balance sheet data, combined with negative equity trends, indicates that the company's capital structure is highly dependent on successful production ramp-up to avoid covenant breaches or forced restructuring.
Working Capital Swings Reflect Pre-Production Volatility
Based on reported figures, SOC's cash conversion cycle swung from 89 days in 2026Q1 to -13 days in 2026Q2, driven by a DSO drop from 109 to 17 days, indicating erratic operational timing.
The dramatic improvement in CCC to -13 days in 2026Q2, from 89 days in 2026Q1, appears to reflect the first oil sale and faster collection, but the negative cycle is largely a function of high DPO (37 days) relative to DIO (7 days), not operational efficiency. The extreme volatility in DSO, DIO, and DPO across quarters—such as DIO of 512 days in 2025Q4—suggests that working capital metrics are distorted by pre-production inventory buildup and irregular supplier payments, making them unreliable for trend analysis. Investors should monitor whether the negative CCC persists as production stabilizes, as it may indicate favorable supplier terms or simply timing mismatches.
Returns Decay Amid Restart Investment
Per financial statements, SOC's ROIC improved to -3.8% in 2026Q2 from -30.4% in 2024Q1, but remains deeply negative, indicating that capital invested in the SYU restart is not yet generating adequate returns.
The improvement in ROIC from -30.4% in 2024Q1 to -3.8% in 2026Q2 reflects the initial revenue from first oil, but the metric remains far below the cost of capital, suggesting that the massive capital outlays for pipeline repair and platform restart have not yet translated into value creation. ROE of -15.7% in 2026Q2, though improved from -176.5% in 2024Q3, is still negative, indicating that shareholder equity is being eroded by ongoing losses. The return on capital is likely to remain suppressed until production reaches stable levels and fixed costs are absorbed, making it premature to assess the long-term compounding potential of the asset base.
Thin Margins Mask Restart Costs
As reported in financial statements, SOC's gross margin of 17.2% in 2026Q2 appears structurally low for offshore production, while operating margin of -48.8% reveals that overhead costs overwhelm first revenue.
The gross margin of 17.2% in 2026Q2, despite first oil revenue of $137.1M, suggests that lease operating expenses and compliance costs are consuming a significant portion of revenue, potentially indicating that the restart is uneconomic at current cost levels. The operating margin of -48.8% and net margin of -46.8% highlight that SG&A and other fixed costs are scaling faster than production income, reflecting negative operating leverage. This margin profile implies that SOC's true earning power is heavily dependent on achieving higher production volumes and cost discipline, which remains unproven given the short operating history since restart.
Misapplied P/E Obscures Restart Value
The most commonly misapplied ratio for SOC is P/E, which is meaningless given negative earnings; instead, investors should use risked NAV or EV/EBITDA once production stabilizes, per reported financials.
Traditional valuation multiples like P/E and EV/EBITDA are currently unusable for SOC due to negative earnings and lack of consistent EBITDA, as evidenced by the -1.14 P/E and missing EV/EBITDA in the data. The market's focus on P/E may obscure the company's true value, which lies in the risked net asset value of the SYU reserves and the option value of the Las Flores Canyon infrastructure. Analysts should adjust for the high regulatory and operational risks by applying a discount rate that reflects the probability of successful restart, rather than relying on earnings-based multiples that are distorted by non-cash charges and pre-production losses.