Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.5x · EV/EBITDA 8.1x · ROE -58.7%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $62M | $56M | $90M | $198M | $213M | $426M | $107M | $108M | $86M | $61M | $56M |
| Enterprise Value | $708M | $703M | $704M | $376M | $342M | $535M | $242M | $244M | $95M | $73M | $71M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.48 | — | — | 40.80 | 15.75 | 13.56 | — | 5.20 | 25.58 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 1.54 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 1.01 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 2.93 | 3.11 | 7.04 | 4.87 | 3.18 | 7.16 | 9.25 | 7.55 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 21.85 | — | 26.95 | 36.86 | 44.09 | — |
| P/OCF | 2.03 | 1.84 | 2.04 | 6.42 | 8.45 | 13.76 | 248.18 | 12.90 | 13.40 | 10.14 | 26.48 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.87 | 1.05 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 1.93 | 1.70 | 2.02 | 1.11 | 0.91 | 0.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.15 | 8.08 | 15.69 | 15.06 | 12.02 | 17.74 | — | 13.42 | 11.01 | 75.30 | — |
| EV / EBIT | 16.19 | 16.06 | 106.28 | 20.48 | 20.97 | 19.26 | — | 29.91 | 13.19 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 27.45 | — | 61.00 | 40.59 | 52.66 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 11.9% | 11.9% | 18.2% | 19.8% | 21.0% | 23.5% | 14.7% | 20.5% | 24.4% | 22.3% | 21.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 5.4% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 5.1% | 7.0% | -9.6% | 10.6% | 6.8% | -2.6% | -8.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -11.4% | -11.4% | -2.4% | 1.4% | 4.3% | 11.3% | -9.0% | 17.3% | 3.8% | -5.3% | -23.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -58.7% | -58.7% | -11.7% | 6.9% | 21.0% | 76.0% | -45.9% | 90.6% | 35.2% | -60.2% | -123.7% |
| ROA | -10.0% | -10.0% | -2.5% | 1.6% | 5.2% | 14.1% | -6.1% | 15.9% | 6.0% | -7.9% | -30.6% |
| ROIC | 4.2% | 4.2% | 1.5% | 3.1% | 6.7% | 8.9% | -6.3% | 10.0% | 22.3% | -7.6% | -17.6% |
| ROCE | 5.5% | 5.5% | 2.0% | 3.7% | 7.5% | 10.7% | -7.8% | 11.8% | 15.6% | -5.6% | -15.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 5.84 | 5.84 | 3.16 | 2.96 | 2.68 | 2.19 | 7.24 | 4.38 | 0.86 | 2.03 | 2.30 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 7.49 | 7.49 | 14.29 | 7.98 | 6.46 | 4.40 | — | 8.17 | 1.19 | 13.87 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 5.80 | 3.03 | 2.65 | 1.87 | 1.80 | 6.13 | 4.02 | 0.72 | 1.80 | 2.09 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.44 | 7.44 | 13.67 | 7.14 | 4.52 | 3.61 | — | 7.49 | 1.01 | 12.25 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | 5.59 | — | 34.05 | 3.73 | 8.57 | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.21 | 2.61 | — | — | -0.59 | 4.18 | 6.04 | -2.28 | -11.91 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.80 | 1.72 | 1.02 | 0.84 | 0.96 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.73 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.70 | 1.59 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.63 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 0.36 | 1.21 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.44 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.91 | 0.70 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 1.21 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 1.53 | 1.50 | 1.37 |
| Inventory Turnover | 72.15 | 72.15 | 48.65 | 43.17 | 43.65 | 54.15 | 48.62 | 31.36 | 46.07 | 44.21 | 43.65 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 15.80 | 12.55 | 19.35 | 17.98 | 15.45 | 15.82 | 32.34 | 30.99 | 26.40 | 30.52 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 2.5% | 6.3% | 7.4% | — | 19.2% | 3.9% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 4.6% | — | 3.7% | 2.7% | 2.3% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 2.0% | 3.5% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 2.0% | 3.5% | 4.0% | 3.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $31M | $31M | $32M | $34M | $34M | $29M | $30M | $28M | $25M | $25M |
High leverage and liquidity
Based on reported figures, STKS trades at a P/S ratio of 0.08 and a negative P/E, suggesting that the market is heavily discounting the company's equity due to persistent bottom-line losses and the substantial debt load incurred from recent aggressive acquisition-led expansion strategies.
The current valuation multiples appear to reflect a market pricing in significant execution risk rather than growth potential. Investors should monitor whether the low P/S ratio indicates a deep value opportunity or a structural impairment of the company's ability to convert revenue into shareholder value.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's ROIC has struggled to maintain positive territory, fluctuating between -0.7% and 1.8% over the last ten quarters, which highlights the difficulty of generating adequate returns on the capital deployed for large-scale restaurant brand acquisitions.
The inability to consistently generate returns above the cost of capital suggests that the current growth strategy may be value-destructive. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the integration of acquired brands will eventually yield the expected synergies or if the capital base remains permanently bloated.
As reported in financial statements, the company's cash conversion cycle has shown extreme instability, ranging from -5 days to 3 days, which indicates that management's control over inventory and supplier payment terms is highly sensitive to the timing of large-scale operational shifts and integration activities.
While a negative cash conversion cycle is generally a positive indicator of supplier leverage, the volatility here suggests that the company's working capital management is not yet optimized. Investors should interpret these fluctuations as a sign of operational inconsistency rather than a sustainable competitive advantage in cash management.
Based on the company's reported figures, the Debt/Equity ratio reached 5.84 in 2025Q4, indicating that the firm's reliance on debt financing has created a precarious financial position that significantly limits its ability to navigate sector-specific downturns or fund organic growth without further capital market intervention.
The interest coverage ratio, which has dipped into negative territory in recent periods, suggests that debt service is becoming increasingly difficult to manage. This leverage profile appears to be the primary driver of the company's current financial vulnerability and warrants close monitoring by stakeholders.
Data from recent filings indicates that the market commonly misapplies traditional P/E ratios to STKS, which obscures the company's true earning power by failing to account for the heavy non-cash depreciation and integration-related charges inherent in its aggressive, acquisition-heavy hospitality platform business model.
Investors should instead focus on Restaurant-Level EBITDA to better understand the core operational performance of the 'vibe dining' units. Relying on GAAP net income in this context may lead to an overly pessimistic assessment of the company's underlying cash-generative potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying STKS stock.
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.5x. The historical average is 19.8x.
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 25.8x.
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -58.7%. The historical average is -6.3%.
Based on historical data, The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. has 11.9% gross margin and 5.4% operating margin.
The ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 7.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.