Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -114.8%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.9B | $4.7B | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.2B | $4.9B | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.09 | 2.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.96 | 2.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 9.92 | 24.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 9.85 | 24.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 25.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 80.5% | 80.5% | 81.1% | 83.0% | 82.1% | 86.8% | -537.0% | 77.5% |
| Operating Margin | -73.4% | -73.4% | 7.8% | 18.5% | -21.0% | -57.1% | -1483.7% | -10.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -109.2% | -109.2% | -0.2% | 29.6% | -25.2% | -93.6% | -2555.2% | -29.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -114.8% | -114.8% | -0.2% | 35.3% | -25.5% | -48.2% | -120.4% | -180.7% |
| ROA | -37.6% | -37.6% | -0.1% | 8.7% | -6.0% | -13.6% | -35.2% | -19.2% |
| ROIC | -39.1% | -39.1% | 3.6% | 6.4% | -5.5% | -15.0% | -128.9% | — |
| ROCE | -32.9% | -32.9% | 3.4% | 6.7% | -6.1% | -9.8% | -25.0% | -31.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.69 | 1.73 | 2.65 | 2.14 | 0.02 | 0.68 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 14.34 | 8.73 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.14 | 0.97 | 1.18 | 2.24 | 1.66 | -0.44 | -7.22 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 8.18 | 5.91 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.39 | 5.22 | 5.41 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -10.04 | -10.04 | 1.21 | 1.55 | -1.08 | -3.51 | -10.68 | -13.07 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.50 | 0.89 | 1.09 | 1.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.50 | 0.89 | 1.09 | 1.12 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.43 | 0.77 | 0.98 | 1.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.66 |
| Inventory Turnover | 36.80 | 36.80 | 20.69 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 2.20 | 2.28 | 4.47 | 3.72 | 18.14 | 305.40 | 5.08 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 10.1% | 4.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $346M | $326M | $329M | $329M | $329M | $368M | $368M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying STUB stock.
StubHub Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
StubHub Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -114.8%. The historical average is -65.0%.
Based on historical data, StubHub Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
StubHub Holdings, Inc. has 80.5% gross margin and -73.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent operating losses and negative growth
Valuation Reflects Profitability Hope, Not Current Reality
The forward P/E of 18.7x appears to price in a significant earnings recovery, yet the trailing P/E of -1.14x and a P/S of 1.32x highlight the disconnect between current losses and future expectations, as reported in recent financial statements.
The valuation multiples are bifurcated, with the forward P/E suggesting the market is pricing a return to profitability that has not yet been demonstrated. The P/S ratio of 1.32x is modest for a high-growth marketplace but appears elevated given the -1.4% revenue growth, implying investors are paying for optionality on margin expansion rather than current fundamentals. The P/B of 1.17x is particularly notable given the company's deep accumulated deficit, suggesting the market is valuing the platform's network effects and brand over its tangible book value.
Gross Margin Strength Eroded by Structural Cost Burden
StubHub's gross margin consistently exceeds 80%, yet the operating margin has swung from -2.9% to 7.3% in recent quarters, indicating that profitability is highly sensitive to revenue volume and cost timing rather than demonstrating consistent operating leverage.
The 80%+ gross margin confirms the low marginal cost of the digital marketplace model, but the volatile operating margin reveals a massive fixed cost base, likely dominated by customer acquisition and marketing. The recent swing to a 7.3% operating margin in 2026Q2, after a -2.9% margin in 2025Q4, suggests profitability is achieved only during peak event cycles and is not yet structurally embedded. The net margin's wild swings, from -119.2% to 10.8%, further indicate that non-operating items and working capital effects are distorting the true underlying earning power of the core transaction business.
Negative Returns Signal Capital Destruction, Not Compounding
The company's ROE has been negative for seven of the last ten quarters, hitting -114.8% in 2025Q4, which suggests that invested capital is being consumed by operating losses rather than generating returns for shareholders.
The deeply negative ROE and ROIC trends indicate a business that is not yet creating value from its invested capital base. The brief periods of positive ROE, such as 2.4% in 2026Q1, appear to be driven by temporary working capital benefits rather than sustainable operational profitability. The ROIC of 1.7% in 2026Q2, while positive, remains far below any reasonable cost of capital, confirming that the company is still in a phase of investing for scale rather than harvesting returns.
Working Capital Swings Dominate Cash Generation
The cash conversion cycle has been consistently negative, reaching -38 days in 2026Q2, which indicates the company collects cash from buyers before paying sellers, creating a structural working capital float that masks underlying cash burn.
The negative CCC is a hallmark of marketplace models where customer payments are collected upfront. However, the extreme volatility in DPO, from 26 to 110 days, suggests that the company's ability to delay payments to sellers is a primary lever for managing short-term liquidity. The recent improvement in the CCC from -85 to -38 days may indicate a normalization of payment terms or a shift in seller mix, but it also reduces the working capital benefit that has recently bolstered operating cash flow.
Deleveraging Obscures Operational Cash Consumption
The debt-to-equity ratio has improved dramatically from 1.77 to 0.67 over the past year, yet this appears driven by equity erosion from retained losses rather than strong operational cash flow generation.
The reduction in leverage is a positive development, but the context is critical. The improvement coincides with a period of deep net losses, meaning the equity base is shrinking, which mathematically lowers the D/E ratio. The interest coverage ratio of 3.17x in 2026Q2 is adequate, but it is highly volatile and was negative just two quarters prior, indicating that debt service comfort is dependent on achieving quarterly profitability. The company's leverage profile is currently manageable, but it is not a reflection of financial strength derived from earnings.
The Misleading Signal of the Current Ratio
The current ratio, which hovers near 1.0, is the most commonly misapplied metric for this business model because it fails to account for the massive, non-current goodwill and intangible asset base that dominates the balance sheet.
For a marketplace like StubHub, the current ratio is a poor indicator of true liquidity because it ignores the company's most significant asset: its platform and brand, represented by $2.7B in goodwill and intangibles. A current ratio of 1.04 suggests adequate short-term coverage, but this is misleading because the company's true liquidity risk is not about covering next month's payables, but about funding ongoing operating losses and potential impairment of its long-lived assets. Analysts should instead focus on the cash burn rate relative to the remaining cash balance and the sustainability of the working capital float, as these better capture the company's actual financial flexibility.