Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $6M | $27M | $207M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $14M | $35M | $210M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 46.51 | 217.85 | 445.49 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 283.83 | 450.34 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -250.4% | -250.4% | 0.3% | 17.9% | 20.8% | 30.5% |
| Operating Margin | -11994.8% | -11994.8% | -1733.5% | -321.2% | -99.5% | -3.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | -14142.9% | -14142.9% | -1745.2% | -321.9% | -89.4% | 4.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -791.9% | -861.9% | — | 85.3% |
| ROA | -416.3% | -416.3% | -183.3% | -108.1% | -64.4% | 5.9% |
| ROIC | -682.5% | -682.5% | -275.7% | -248.8% | -715.5% | — |
| ROCE | -2021.2% | -2021.2% | -293.1% | -227.8% | -563.6% | -28.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 0.78 | — | 4.09 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 0.03 | — | -3.70 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -0.68 |
| Interest Coverage | -75.83 | -75.83 | -182.77 | -101.41 | -234.00 | 78.87 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 1.23 | 1.98 | 0.53 | 0.99 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 1.23 | 1.98 | 0.53 | 0.99 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.90 | 0.36 | 0.64 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.42 | 1.30 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 16.29 | 9.66 | 104.96 | 26.05 | 79.96 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M | $3M |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
Based on reported figures, TDTH trades at a 46.51x price-to-sales multiple, a valuation that appears fundamentally detached from the company's 73.51% year-over-year revenue decline and the absence of positive earnings, suggesting the market may be pricing in speculative optionality rather than current operational performance.
The lack of meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA metrics underscores the firm's status as a distressed entity rather than a growth-stage technology company. Investors should monitor whether this premium valuation is supported by any tangible intellectual property or if it represents a mispricing of the firm's actual market relevance.
As reported in financial statements, TDTH's return on invested capital has trended into negative territory, reaching -3.8% in 2025Q4, which indicates that the company is failing to generate any economic value from its capital base and is instead actively destroying shareholder wealth through its current operations.
The negative ROIC trend suggests that the capital deployed into the Tridentity platform and consulting infrastructure is not yielding sufficient returns to cover the cost of capital. This persistent decay warrants further investigation into whether the company's business model is structurally incapable of achieving positive returns on invested capital.
According to recent SEC filings, TDTH's asset turnover ratio has plummeted to 0.03, reflecting a severe inability to utilize its asset base to generate revenue, while the lack of meaningful cash conversion cycle data suggests significant friction in the company's core operational and collection processes.
The extremely low asset turnover indicates that the company's infrastructure is largely underutilized, which is consistent with the sharp decline in top-line revenue. The inability to efficiently convert assets into sales suggests that the current operational setup is not optimized for the scale required to achieve profitability.
Based on the 2025Q4 data, the company's current ratio of 0.14 highlights a severe liquidity shortfall, leaving the firm with minimal cash reserves of $150,334 to meet its immediate obligations, which suggests that the company is operating in a state of extreme financial vulnerability and potential insolvency.
The current ratio indicates that the company lacks the liquid assets necessary to cover its short-term liabilities, making it highly dependent on external financing or rapid operational improvements. Investors should monitor the company's ability to secure additional capital, as the current liquidity position appears insufficient for ongoing operations.
The most commonly misapplied metric for TDTH is the price-to-sales ratio, which obscures the company's negative gross margins and suggests a growth trajectory that is not supported by the underlying unit economics of its bespoke IT consulting and Web 3.0 platform services.
Using P/S as a valuation tool for this business model is misleading because it ignores the fact that each additional dollar of revenue appears to be generated at a loss. A more appropriate focus would be on the cash burn rate relative to the remaining liquidity runway, which provides a clearer picture of the firm's survival risk.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TDTH stock.
Trident Digital Tech Holdings Ltd's current P/E ratio is -0.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Trident Digital Tech Holdings Ltd is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Trident Digital Tech Holdings Ltd has -250.4% gross margin and -11994.8% operating margin.