Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 33.7x · EV/EBITDA 23.5x · ROE 36.3%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $96.7B | $87.0B | $84.4B | $56.3B | $39.5B | $49.0B | $35.3B | $25.2B | $17.7B | $17.9B | $15.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $99.5B | $89.9B | $88.2B | $60.0B | $43.1B | $51.6B | $37.3B | $29.5B | $20.9B | $20.4B | $17.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | 33.68 | 29.98 | 32.86 | 27.81 | 22.47 | 34.42 | 41.24 | 17.87 | 13.23 | 13.70 | 10.30 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.53 | 4.08 | 4.25 | 3.18 | 2.47 | 3.46 | 2.83 | 1.93 | 1.43 | 1.26 | 1.13 |
| P/B Ratio | 11.37 | 10.12 | 11.27 | 8.02 | 6.45 | 7.78 | 5.47 | 3.43 | 2.49 | 2.46 | 2.24 |
| P/FCF | 34.38 | 30.95 | 30.40 | 26.94 | 32.57 | 35.85 | 27.38 | 15.13 | 16.98 | 13.71 | 11.56 |
| P/OCF | 30.26 | 27.24 | 26.82 | 23.55 | 26.25 | 30.82 | 24.59 | 13.13 | 12.57 | 11.72 | 10.15 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.22 | 4.44 | 3.39 | 2.70 | 3.65 | 2.99 | 2.25 | 1.69 | 1.43 | 1.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.52 | 21.24 | 22.72 | 18.52 | 15.74 | 22.28 | 20.40 | 15.05 | 11.15 | 10.11 | 9.01 |
| EV / EBIT | 25.08 | 23.01 | 25.33 | 21.40 | 17.99 | 25.50 | 24.25 | 17.95 | 11.11 | 12.47 | 8.96 |
| EV / FCF | — | 31.97 | 31.77 | 28.70 | 35.56 | 37.82 | 28.92 | 17.70 | 20.04 | 15.64 | 13.35 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 36.2% | 36.2% | 35.7% | 33.1% | 31.0% | 31.6% | 30.5% | 30.8% | 30.5% | 30.9% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 18.6% | 17.6% | 16.4% | 15.1% | 14.3% | 12.3% | 12.8% | 12.2% | 11.7% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.7% | 13.7% | 12.9% | 11.4% | 11.0% | 10.1% | 6.9% | 10.8% | 10.8% | 9.2% | 10.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 36.3% | 36.3% | 35.4% | 30.8% | 28.3% | 22.4% | 12.4% | 19.5% | 18.6% | 18.5% | 23.2% |
| ROA | 14.0% | 14.0% | 13.0% | 10.8% | 9.7% | 7.9% | 4.4% | 7.3% | 7.4% | 7.3% | 8.6% |
| ROIC | 26.2% | 26.2% | 23.9% | 21.2% | 19.4% | 17.4% | 11.5% | 11.4% | 11.3% | 13.2% | 12.9% |
| ROCE | 27.2% | 27.2% | 25.5% | 22.5% | 18.8% | 14.9% | 10.4% | 11.4% | 11.2% | 12.3% | 11.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.60 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.39 | 1.48 | 1.77 | 2.09 | 2.89 | 2.85 | 2.18 | 2.02 | 2.09 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.33 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 1.32 | 1.16 | 1.08 | 2.18 | 1.70 | 1.25 | 1.21 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.01 | 1.37 | 1.76 | 2.98 | 1.97 | 1.54 | 2.56 | 3.06 | 1.93 | 1.79 |
| Interest Coverage | 17.17 | 17.17 | 14.60 | 11.95 | 10.72 | 8.67 | 6.18 | 6.76 | 8.51 | 7.57 | 8.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 1.12 | 1.36 | 1.59 | 1.28 | 1.33 | 1.27 | 1.55 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 1.04 | 1.32 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.45 | 0.76 | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 0.48 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.78 | 0.78 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.47 | 6.47 | 6.47 | 5.49 | 5.53 | 6.31 | 7.27 | 5.31 | 5.12 | 6.31 | 6.73 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 55.38 | 56.86 | 70.52 | 63.45 | 62.73 | 64.54 | 60.98 | 79.22 | 63.69 | 60.06 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 28.7% | 28.7% | 29.5% | 33.8% | 35.3% | 39.4% | 59.3% | 36.2% | 35.8% | 33.0% | 23.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.0% | 3.3% | 3.0% | 3.6% | 4.4% | 2.9% | 2.4% | 5.6% | 7.6% | 7.3% | 9.7% |
| FCF Yield | 2.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | 3.7% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 3.7% | 6.6% | 5.9% | 7.3% | 8.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.5% | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.2% | 3.0% | 2.2% | 0.7% | 3.0% | 5.1% | 5.7% | 1.6% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.4% | 2.7% | 2.4% | 2.4% | 4.6% | 3.4% | 2.1% | 5.0% | 7.8% | 8.1% | 3.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $224M | $228M | $231M | $235M | $242M | $243M | $244M | $250M | $258M | $262M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TT stock.
Trane Technologies plc's current P/E ratio is 33.7x. The historical average is 17.8x. This places it at the 93th percentile of its historical range.
Trane Technologies plc's current EV/EBITDA is 23.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.1x.
Trane Technologies plc's return on equity (ROE) is 36.3%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 16.5%.
Based on historical data, Trane Technologies plc is trading at a P/E of 33.7x. This is at the 93th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Trane Technologies plc's current dividend yield is 0.86% with a payout ratio of 28.7%.
Trane Technologies plc has 36.2% gross margin and 18.6% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Trane Technologies plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cyclical demand and input costs
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Drives Profitability
TT's operating margin expanded to 19.3% in 2026Q2 from 15.6% in 2026Q1, as per the latest quarterly report, reflecting strong operating leverage and pricing power in commercial HVAC.
The sequential margin improvement is notable, with gross margin also rising to 35.6% from 34.8% in the prior quarter, indicating that the company is capturing both pricing and mix benefits. Net margin of 14.6% in 2026Q2 is among the highest in the peer group, surpassing Carrier's 6.8% and Johnson Controls' 13.9%, based on reported figures. This suggests that TT's focus on higher-margin services and recurring revenue streams is translating into superior bottom-line performance, though investors should monitor whether this trajectory is sustainable given cyclical demand.
ROIC Shows Cyclicality but Uptrend
TT's ROIC improved to 7.6% in 2026Q2 from 4.4% in 2024Q1, as reported in financial statements, indicating a cyclical recovery and efficient capital deployment despite a capital-intensive industry.
The ROIC trend over the past ten quarters shows a clear seasonal pattern, with troughs in Q1 and peaks in Q2/Q3, reflecting the HVAC industry's demand seasonality. However, the overall trajectory is upward, with 2026Q2 ROIC of 7.6% matching the prior year's peak, suggesting that the company is generating higher returns on its invested capital. This improvement is driven by both margin expansion and asset efficiency, as asset turnover has remained stable around 0.27. While ROIC is below Lennox's 29.8%, it is above Carrier's 5.9% and Johnson Controls' 8.5%, indicating that TT is creating value relative to its closest peers.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
TT's cash conversion cycle shortened to 53 days in 2026Q2 from 77 days in 2024Q1, as per the latest quarterly report, reflecting better receivables and inventory management.
The improvement in CCC is driven by a reduction in DSO from 69 to 57 days and DIO from 75 to 56 days over the same period, while DPO has remained relatively stable around 60 days. This suggests that TT is collecting cash faster and managing inventory more efficiently, which is critical in a cyclical industry. The company's ability to shorten its cash conversion cycle while growing revenue indicates strong operational discipline, though the seasonal spike in Q1 (62 days in 2026Q1) should be expected. Asset turnover of 0.27 is consistent with the industrial sector, but the efficiency gains in working capital are a positive sign for future cash generation.
Leverage Declines, Coverage Strengthens
TT's D/E ratio fell to 0.53 in 2026Q2 from 0.76 in 2024Q1, while interest coverage rose to 22.9x, as reported in financial statements, indicating a more comfortable debt position.
The reduction in leverage is driven by both debt repayment and equity growth, with total debt declining to $4.6B from $5.3B over the period. Interest coverage of 22.9x in 2026Q2 is well above the 10.5x seen in 2024Q1, suggesting that TT's earnings comfortably cover its interest obligations. This improved coverage provides a buffer against potential rate increases or earnings volatility. However, D/EBITDA of 3.80 remains elevated relative to some peers, though it is down from 6.73 in 2024Q1, indicating a positive trend. Investors should monitor whether the company maintains this deleveraging trajectory or if acquisitions increase leverage.
Liquidity Adequate but Tight
TT's current ratio stood at 1.07 in 2026Q2, with a quick ratio of 0.76, as per the latest balance sheet, indicating a modest liquidity buffer that could be strained in a downturn.
The current ratio has remained relatively stable around 1.1 over the past ten quarters, but the quick ratio of 0.76 suggests that TT relies on inventory to meet short-term obligations. In a severe demand shock, inventory could become difficult to liquidate, potentially pressuring liquidity. However, the company's robust cash flow generation, with FCF margin of 18.8% in 2026Q2, provides an alternative source of liquidity. The cash balance of $1.3B, while not excessive, is supplemented by strong operating cash flow, which should support working capital needs. Investors should monitor the current ratio if the company embarks on large acquisitions or if demand weakens.
P/E Misleads on Cyclical Earnings
TT's trailing P/E of 37.16 appears expensive, but as reported in market data, this metric is distorted by cyclical earnings troughs; forward P/E of 31.85 better reflects normalized earnings.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for TT is the trailing P/E, which is elevated due to the cyclicality of HVAC demand and the fact that current earnings are near a peak. Using a forward P/E of 31.85, which incorporates expected earnings growth, provides a more accurate picture of valuation. Additionally, EV/EBITDA of 25.87 is high relative to peers like Carrier (20.08) and Lennox (15.38), but this may be justified by TT's superior margins and return on capital. Investors should use a mid-cycle earnings estimate or EV/EBITDA to assess TT's valuation, as trailing P/E can be misleading in a cyclical industry. The PEG ratio of 1.25 suggests that the stock is reasonably priced relative to its growth rate, but this depends on the sustainability of that growth.