Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA 37.2x · ROE N/A. (2022–2024 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $564M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.07 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.16 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | 27.1% | 27.1% | 34.7% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | -2.4% | 5.6% | 7.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -13.6% | -13.6% | -6.0% | -7.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | -62.0% | -21.2% |
| ROA | -8.7% | -8.7% | -2.9% | -3.3% |
| ROIC | -1.3% | -1.3% | 2.3% | — |
| ROCE | -1.7% | -1.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 4.91 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 37.53 | 37.53 | 20.34 | 14.69 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | 4.86 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 36.91 | 36.91 | 20.16 | 14.54 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.18 | -0.18 | 0.44 | 0.48 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.50 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.50 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.65 | 0.41 | 0.42 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 3.23 | 3.60 | 2.01 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $50M | $50M | $50M |
Insolvency and Liquidity Risk
As reported in recent financial filings, TWNP's ROIC has trended into negative territory, reaching -1.8% in 2025Q2, which indicates that the company is currently failing to generate sufficient returns on its invested capital to cover the costs of its recent aggressive expansion and corporate reorganization efforts.
The consistent decline in ROIC from positive levels in early 2024 suggests that the capital deployed into new unit builds and acquisitions is not yet yielding the expected operational efficiencies. Investors should monitor whether this trend reflects a structural inability to scale the 'lodge' concept or merely temporary friction from the Smokey Bones integration.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at 0.16 since 2024Q2, suggesting that the firm is struggling to extract meaningful revenue productivity from its growing asset base following the recent corporate formation and subsequent portfolio expansion.
The low asset turnover ratio relative to industry peers indicates that the company's large-format restaurant footprint is not being utilized at optimal capacity. This inefficiency, combined with the persistent reliance on external capital, suggests that the current operational model may be too capital-intensive for the prevailing revenue environment.
According to the most recent quarterly statements, TWNP maintains a current ratio of 0.60, which, when paired with a cash balance of only $9.37M, indicates a precarious liquidity position that leaves the company with limited flexibility to navigate potential sector-specific downturns or unexpected operational cost spikes.
A current ratio consistently below 1.0 implies that the company's short-term liabilities are outpacing its liquid assets, creating a reliance on continuous financing. This vulnerability warrants close investigation, as any disruption in the franchise pipeline or a decline in foot traffic could necessitate an immediate and potentially dilutive capital raise.
Based on the reported figures, the market's focus on the 53.25% revenue growth rate is potentially misleading, as it obscures the underlying negative net margins and the reality that this growth is largely driven by inorganic M&A activity rather than organic same-store sales performance.
Analysts should prioritize unit-level contribution margins and cash-on-cash returns over top-line growth, as the latter currently masks the high cost of corporate overhead and integration. Relying on revenue multiples for a company in this stage of reorganization may lead to an overestimation of the firm's intrinsic value.
Includes 30+ ratios · 3 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying TWNP stock.
Twin Hospitality Group's current P/E ratio is -0.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Twin Hospitality Group's current EV/EBITDA is 37.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA.
Based on historical data, Twin Hospitality Group is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Twin Hospitality Group has 27.1% gross margin and -2.4% operating margin.
Twin Hospitality Group's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 37.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.