Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.0x · EV/EBITDA 48.3x · ROE -30.0%. (2004–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.0B | $2.5B | $2.6B | $3.2B | $3.9B | $8.5B | $6.8B | $8.7B | $7.2B | $5.9B | $11.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $3.6B | $4.1B | $3.4B | $3.8B | $4.7B | $8.9B | $7.2B | $9.2B | $7.4B | $6.5B | $11.8B |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.96 | — | — | 13.73 | 10.15 | 23.43 | — | 95.90 | — | — | 55.93 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.67 | 1.49 | 1.51 | 1.66 | 1.39 | 1.18 | 2.32 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.38 | 1.75 | 1.36 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 4.89 | 4.03 | 4.05 | 3.57 | 2.91 | 5.51 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | 15.81 | — | 14.21 | 56.04 | 23.99 | 15.75 | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 9.10 | — | 12.72 | 31.74 | 17.12 | 11.47 | 25.08 | 36.78 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.83 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.81 | 1.57 | 1.62 | 1.76 | 1.42 | 1.30 | 2.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 48.34 | 55.24 | 10.98 | 10.14 | 13.39 | 12.95 | 47.81 | 23.08 | 21.63 | 19.91 | 20.32 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 14.52 | 16.91 | 20.50 | — | 39.64 | — | 253.64 | 28.49 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | 18.68 | — | 14.99 | 60.09 | 25.39 | 16.12 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.5% | 45.5% | 47.9% | 46.1% | 44.3% | 50.6% | 47.9% | 46.5% | 45.0% | 44.8% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | -0.7% | 3.3% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 9.6% | -0.3% | 4.1% | 3.1% | 3.0% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -10.0% | -10.0% | -3.9% | 4.1% | 6.4% | 6.3% | -12.3% | 1.8% | -0.9% | -1.0% | 4.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -30.0% | -30.0% | -10.0% | 11.3% | 20.3% | 21.1% | -28.7% | 4.4% | -2.3% | -2.4% | 10.7% |
| ROA | -11.4% | -11.4% | -4.4% | 4.8% | 8.1% | 7.6% | -11.1% | 2.0% | -1.1% | -1.3% | 6.1% |
| ROIC | -0.9% | -0.9% | 4.7% | 6.3% | 6.6% | 18.8% | -0.4% | 6.6% | 5.0% | 4.4% | 13.6% |
| ROCE | -1.2% | -1.2% | 5.0% | 6.6% | 6.6% | 16.2% | -0.4% | 6.7% | 5.4% | 5.1% | 16.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.37 | 1.37 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.77 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.40 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 26.13 | 26.13 | 4.23 | 3.84 | 4.29 | 2.14 | 13.24 | 3.25 | 2.14 | 2.82 | 1.41 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.15 | 0.42 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.30 | 0.28 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 21.97 | 21.97 | 2.60 | 1.56 | 2.29 | 0.68 | 3.22 | 1.28 | 0.50 | 1.86 | 0.98 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | 2.87 | — | 0.78 | 4.05 | 1.41 | 0.37 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -5.63 | -5.63 | -32.58 | — | 21.94 | 9.83 | -9.43 | 10.19 | -1.04 | 0.71 | 16.73 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.62 | 1.62 | 2.10 | 2.46 | 2.17 | 2.18 | 2.28 | 1.90 | 1.97 | 2.20 | 2.87 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.25 | 1.63 | 1.30 | 1.55 | 1.65 | 1.27 | 1.20 | 1.11 | 1.53 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.45 | 0.74 | 0.52 | 0.78 | 1.07 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.29 | 0.37 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.12 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.28 | 0.89 | 1.08 | 1.22 | 1.24 | 1.32 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.96 | 2.96 | 2.85 | 3.20 | 2.75 | 3.41 | 2.60 | 3.15 | 2.80 | 2.37 | 2.83 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 50.11 | 47.75 | 48.55 | 47.26 | 45.05 | 43.04 | 49.29 | 45.86 | 44.72 | 47.10 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 7.3% | 9.8% | 4.3% | — | 1.0% | — | — | 1.8% |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | 6.3% | — | 7.0% | 1.8% | 4.2% | 6.4% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.3% | 1.0% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.3% | 1.0% | 3.5% | 2.3% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $427M | $432M | $451M | $462M | $469M | $454M | $454M | $446M | $441M | $445M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UA stock.
Under Armour, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -4.0x. The historical average is 39.8x.
Under Armour, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 48.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 23.5x.
Under Armour, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -30.0%. The historical average is 14.4%.
Based on historical data, Under Armour, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -4.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Under Armour, Inc. has 45.5% gross margin and -0.7% operating margin.
Under Armour, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 26.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative operating margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Weakness
Gross margin swung from 54.1% in 2027Q1 to 42.0% in 2026Q4, while operating margin turned negative at -2.2% in 2026Q4, indicating promotional pressure and cost deleveraging, per reported figures.
The 2027Q1 gross margin of 54.1% appears to be an outlier, as the trailing ten-quarter average is closer to 47%, suggesting that the latest quarter may benefit from favorable product mix or one-time items. Operating margins have been negative in five of the last ten quarters, with the 2026Q1 spike to 26.3% likely reflecting a one-time gain or cost timing, not sustainable earning power. The persistent negative net margin, reaching -32.3% in 2026Q3, indicates that restructuring charges and inventory write-downs are recurring drags, and the company's true profitability is likely below the surface.
Return on Capital Decays Amid Restructuring
ROIC has been negative in six of the last ten quarters, with 2027Q1 at 1.3% and 2026Q3 at -1.7%, indicating that the company is not generating returns above its cost of capital, based on quarterly data.
The ROIC trend shows a clear deterioration from a peak of 8.4% in 2026Q1 to negative territory in subsequent quarters, suggesting that the capital base is not being deployed efficiently. The decline is driven by both margin compression and asset turnover stagnation, as asset turnover has remained flat around 0.26-0.31. With retained earnings down nearly 80% from 2024Q4 to 2027Q1, the equity base is shrinking, which could artificially inflate ROE if losses moderate, but the underlying return on invested capital remains weak.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens, Straining Cash
Cash conversion cycle expanded from 104 days in 2024Q4 to 139 days in 2027Q1, driven by a DIO increase from 129 to 183 days, indicating slower inventory turnover, as per financial statements.
The DIO increase of over 50 days suggests that Under Armour is holding excess inventory, likely due to weak sell-through and the need to support wholesale partners. DSO has also risen from 49 to 55 days, indicating slower collections, while DPO has increased from 74 to 98 days, which may reflect stretched supplier terms. The net effect is a lengthening cash conversion cycle that ties up cash, contributing to the volatile free cash flow, which swung from -29.7% to +19.6% of revenue over the past year.
Debt Burden Rises as Losses Persist
Debt-to-equity climbed from 0.67 in 2024Q4 to 0.96 in 2027Q1, while interest coverage turned negative at -3.87 in 2026Q4, indicating reduced debt service comfort, based on reported balance sheet data.
The doubling of D/E over ten quarters reflects both rising debt (to $1.4B) and shrinking equity, as retained earnings have been depleted by cumulative losses. Interest coverage has been negative in several quarters, including -17.04 in 2026Q3, suggesting that operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses, though the 2027Q1 coverage of 3.73 shows some improvement. The elevated D/EBITDA of 34.64 in 2027Q1 is distorted by depressed EBITDA, but it underscores the risk if losses persist, as the company may face refinancing challenges.
Liquidity Buffer Thins Despite Ratio Improvement
Current ratio improved to 1.81 in 2027Q1 from 1.62 in 2026Q4, but cash dropped to $396M, and quick ratio fell to 0.96, indicating inventory-dependent liquidity, per recent filings.
The current ratio appears adequate, but the quick ratio below 1.0 suggests that the company relies heavily on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which is risky given the inventory buildup. Cash levels have declined from $396M in 2027Q1, and with negative free cash flow in several quarters, the liquidity cushion is thinning. Under a severe demand shock, the company may need to draw on credit lines or liquidate inventory at discounts, further pressuring margins.
Misapplied Metric: EV/EBITDA
EV/EBITDA of 52.14 is misleading for Under Armour because EBITDA is depressed by restructuring charges and inventory write-downs, obscuring the underlying cash-generating ability, as per reported figures.
The market often uses EV/EBITDA to compare apparel companies, but for Under Armour, this multiple is distorted by the company's negative operating income and one-time charges. A more appropriate metric is EV/Sales, which at 0.45 reflects the market's skepticism about the company's ability to return to profitability. Alternatively, investors should focus on normalized operating margin and free cash flow yield, which better capture the company's earning power after adjusting for non-recurring items. The forward EV/EBITDA of 17.81 implies a significant margin recovery that may not materialize given the persistent revenue contraction.