Revenue declined 3.4% year-over-year in 2027Q1 to $1.1B, with gross margin improving to 54.1% but operating margin only 4.3% and net income near zero at $545K, reflecting persistent cost misalignment.
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) annual income statement — 24-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Mar'26 | Mar'25 | Mar'24 | Mar'23 | Mar'22 | Mar'21 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 | Dec'11 | Dec'10 | Dec'09 | Dec'08 | Dec'07 | Dec'06 | Dec'05 | Dec'04 | Dec'03 | Dec'02 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 4.95B | 4.97B | 5.17B | 5.7B | 5.9B | 5.68B | 4.47B | 5.27B | 5.19B | 4.99B | 4.83B | 3.96B | 3.08B | 2.33B | 1.83B | 1.47B | 1.06B | 856.41M | 725.24M | 606.56M | 430.69M | 281.05M | 205.18M | 115.42M | 49.55M |
| Revenue Growth % | -3.39% | -3.86% | -9.4% | -3.41% | 3.87% | 27.01% | -15.05% | 1.42% | 4.09% | 3.23% | 21.95% | 28.5% | 32.26% | 27.09% | 24.6% | 38.42% | 24.23% | 18.09% | 19.57% | 40.84% | 53.24% | 36.98% | 77.77% | 132.93% | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 2.62B | 2.71B | 2.69B | 3.07B | 3.26B | 2.82B | 2.31B | 2.8B | 2.85B | 2.74B | 2.58B | 2.06B | 1.57B | 1.2B | 955.62M | 759.85M | 533.42M | 446.29M | 370.3M | 301.52M | 215.09M | 145.2M | 109.75M | 64.76M | 26.33M |
| COGS % of Revenue | - | 54.52% | 52.12% | 53.87% | 55.21% | 49.65% | 51.73% | 53.1% | 54.93% | 54.87% | 53.48% | 51.92% | 50.97% | 51.26% | 52.08% | 51.6% | 50.14% | 52.11% | 51.06% | 49.71% | 49.94% | 51.66% | 53.49% | 56.11% | 53.14% |
| Gross Profit | 2.32B | 2.26B | 2.47B | 2.63B | 2.64B | 2.86B | 2.16B | 2.47B | 2.34B | 2.25B | 2.25B | 1.91B | 1.51B | 1.14B | 879.3M | 712.84M | 530.51M | 410.13M | 354.95M | 305.04M | 215.6M | 135.85M | 95.43M | 50.66M | 23.22M |
| Gross Margin % | 47.01% | 45.48% | 47.88% | 46.13% | 44.79% | 50.35% | 48.27% | 46.9% | 45.07% | 45.13% | 46.52% | 48.08% | 49.03% | 48.74% | 47.92% | 48.4% | 49.86% | 47.89% | 48.94% | 50.29% | 50.06% | 48.34% | 46.51% | 43.89% | 46.86% |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | -8.68% | -5.96% | -0.51% | -7.61% | 32.47% | -12.57% | 5.56% | 3.96% | 0.12% | 18% | 26.01% | 33.04% | 29.27% | 23.35% | 34.37% | 29.35% | 15.55% | 16.36% | 41.49% | 58.7% | 42.35% | 88.37% | 118.17% | - |
| Operating Expenses | 2.31B | 2.29B | 2.3B | 2.4B | 2.38B | 2.38B | 2.77B | 2.23B | 2.37B | 2.22B | 1.83B | 1.5B | 1.16B | 871.57M | 670.6M | 550.07M | 418.15M | 324.85M | 278.02M | 218.78M | 158.32M | 99.96M | 70.05M | 40.71M | 18.91M |
| OpEx % of Revenue | - | 46.2% | 44.57% | 42.1% | 40.32% | 41.79% | 61.98% | 42.41% | 45.55% | 44.57% | 37.89% | 37.77% | 37.55% | 37.37% | 36.55% | 37.35% | 39.3% | 37.93% | 38.34% | 36.07% | 36.76% | 35.57% | 34.14% | 35.27% | 38.16% |
| Selling, General & Admin | 2.31B | 2.29B | 2.3B | 2.4B | 2.38B | 2.33B | 2.17B | 2.23B | 2.18B | 2.1B | 1.83B | 1.5B | 1.16B | 871.57M | 670.6M | 550.07M | 418.15M | 324.85M | 278.02M | 218.78M | 158.32M | 99.96M | 70.05M | 40.71M | 18.91M |
| SG&A % of Revenue | - | 46.2% | 44.57% | 42.1% | 40.32% | 41.08% | 48.54% | 42.41% | 42.02% | 42.08% | 37.89% | 37.77% | 37.55% | 37.37% | 36.55% | 37.35% | 39.3% | 37.93% | 38.34% | 36.07% | 36.76% | 35.57% | 34.14% | 35.27% | 38.16% |
| Research & Development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Operating Expenses | 1000K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40.52M | 601.6M | 0 | 183.15M | 124.05M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Operating Income | 14.57M | -35.39M | 171.09M | 229.75M | 263.59M | 486.29M | -613.44M | 236.77M | -25.02M | 27.84M | 417.47M | 408.55M | 353.95M | 265.1M | 208.69M | 162.77M | 112.36M | 85.27M | 76.92M | 86.27M | 57.28M | 35.89M | 25.38M | 9.95M | 4.31M |
| Operating Margin % | 0.29% | -0.71% | 3.31% | 4.03% | 4.47% | 8.56% | -13.71% | 4.5% | -0.48% | 0.56% | 8.64% | 10.31% | 11.48% | 11.37% | 11.37% | 11.05% | 10.56% | 9.96% | 10.61% | 14.22% | 13.3% | 12.77% | 12.37% | 8.62% | 8.7% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | -120.69% | -25.53% | -12.84% | -45.8% | 179.27% | -359.09% | 1046.44% | -189.85% | -93.33% | 2.18% | 15.42% | 33.52% | 27.03% | 28.22% | 44.87% | 31.76% | 10.85% | -10.83% | 50.61% | 59.59% | 41.41% | 155% | 130.77% | - |
| EBITDA | 53.92M | 74.23M | 306.89M | 372.34M | 399.04M | 627.43M | -448.45M | 423.19M | 156.75M | 201.59M | 562.24M | 509.49M | 426.05M | 315.65M | 251.78M | 199.07M | 143.68M | 113.52M | 98.27M | 100.89M | 67.1M | 42.44M | 28.55M | 11.12M | 4.31M |
| EBITDA Margin % | 1.09% | 1.49% | 5.94% | 6.53% | 6.76% | 11.04% | -10.02% | 8.03% | 3.02% | 4.04% | 11.63% | 12.86% | 13.81% | 13.54% | 13.72% | 13.52% | 13.5% | 13.26% | 13.55% | 16.63% | 15.58% | 15.1% | 13.92% | 9.64% | 8.7% |
| EBITDA Growth % | -91.29% | -75.81% | -17.58% | -6.69% | -36.4% | 239.91% | -205.97% | 169.98% | -22.24% | -64.15% | 10.35% | 19.58% | 34.98% | 25.37% | 26.48% | 38.55% | 26.56% | 15.52% | -2.59% | 50.35% | 58.13% | 48.61% | 156.69% | 157.92% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 54.45M | 109.62M | 135.8M | 142.59M | 135.46M | 141.14M | 164.98M | 186.43M | 181.77M | 173.75M | 144.77M | 100.94M | 72.09M | 50.55M | 43.08M | 36.3M | 31.32M | 28.25M | 21.35M | 14.62M | 9.82M | 6.55M | 3.17M | 1.17M | 0 |
| EBIT | -129.68M | -170.6M | -198.08M | 262.05M | 278.64M | 526.81M | -11.84M | 236.77M | -34.22M | 24.23M | 414.72M | 401.31M | 347.55M | 263.93M | 208.62M | 160.7M | 111.18M | 84.76M | 70.75M | 86.27M | 57.28M | 35.89M | 25.38M | 9.95M | 4.31M |
| Net Interest Income | -36.86M | -30.29M | -6.08M | 268K | -12.83M | -44.3M | -47.26M | -21.24M | -33.57M | -34.54M | -26.43M | -14.63M | -5.33M | -2.93M | -5.18M | -3.84M | -2.26M | -2.34M | -850K | 749K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 268K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 749K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Expense | 36.86M | 30.29M | 6.08M | 0 | 12.83M | 44.3M | 47.26M | 21.24M | 33.57M | 34.54M | 26.43M | 14.63M | 5.33M | 2.93M | 5.18M | 3.84M | 2.26M | 2.34M | 850K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Income/Expense | -181.11M | -165.5M | -375.24M | 32.3M | 2.23M | -94.16M | 113.65M | -74.61M | -42.77M | -38.15M | -29.19M | -21.86M | -11.74M | -4.11M | -5.26M | -5.91M | -3.44M | -2.85M | -7.03M | 2.78M | 1.81M | -2.92M | -1.28M | -2.21M | -894K |
| Pretax Income | -166.54M | -200.89M | -204.16M | 262.05M | 265.81M | 392.13M | -499.79M | 162.16M | -67.79M | -10.31M | 391.13M | 386.69M | 342.21M | 260.99M | 203.44M | 156.86M | 108.92M | 82.42M | 69.9M | 89.04M | 59.09M | 32.97M | 24.1M | 7.74M | 3.42M |
| Pretax Margin % | -3.37% | -4.04% | -3.95% | 4.6% | 4.5% | 6.9% | -11.17% | 3.08% | -1.31% | -0.21% | 8.09% | 9.76% | 11.09% | 11.19% | 11.09% | 10.65% | 10.24% | 9.62% | 9.64% | 14.68% | 13.72% | 11.73% | 11.74% | 6.71% | 6.9% |
| Income Tax | 325.72M | 294.75M | -2.89M | 30.01M | -108.64M | 32.07M | 49.39M | 70.02M | -20.55M | 37.95M | 131.3M | 154.11M | 134.17M | 98.66M | 74.66M | 59.94M | 40.44M | 35.63M | 31.67M | 36.48M | 20.11M | 13.26M | 7.77M | 1.99M | 0 |
| Effective Tax Rate % | -195.58% | -146.72% | 1.42% | 11.45% | -40.87% | 8.18% | -9.88% | 43.18% | 30.32% | -368.13% | 33.57% | 39.85% | 39.21% | 37.8% | 36.7% | 38.21% | 37.13% | 43.23% | 45.31% | 40.97% | 34.03% | 40.2% | 32.26% | 25.73% | 0% |
| Net Income | -492.49M | -495.64M | -201.27M | 232.04M | 374.46M | 360.06M | -549.18M | 92.14M | -46.3M | -48.26M | 256.98M | 232.57M | 208.04M | 162.33M | 128.78M | 96.92M | 68.48M | 46.78M | 38.23M | 52.56M | 38.98M | 19.72M | 16.32M | 5.75M | 2.77M |
| Net Margin % | -9.96% | -9.98% | -3.9% | 4.07% | 6.34% | 6.34% | -12.27% | 1.75% | -0.89% | -0.97% | 5.32% | 5.87% | 6.74% | 6.96% | 7.02% | 6.58% | 6.44% | 5.46% | 5.27% | 8.66% | 9.05% | 7.02% | 7.95% | 4.98% | 5.58% |
| Net Income Growth % | -584.98% | -146.26% | -186.74% | -38.03% | 4% | 165.56% | -696.03% | 299% | 4.06% | -118.78% | 10.49% | 11.79% | 28.16% | 26.05% | 32.87% | 41.54% | 46.37% | 22.38% | -27.26% | 34.84% | 97.67% | 20.81% | 183.96% | 107.81% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | -492.26M | -495.64M | -201.27M | 232.04M | 374.46M | 360.06M | -549.18M | 92.14M | -46.3M | -48.26M | 256.98M | 232.57M | 208.04M | 162.33M | 128.78M | 96.92M | 68.48M | 46.78M | 38.23M | 52.56M | 38.98M | 19.72M | 16.32M | 5.75M | 2.77M |
| Discontinued Operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -1.14 | -1.16 | -0.47 | 0.52 | 0.87 | 0.79 | -1.21 | 0.20 | -0.10 | -0.11 | 0.45 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| EPS Growth % | -608.43% | -146.81% | -190.38% | -40.23% | 10.13% | 165.29% | -705% | 300% | 9.09% | -124.44% | -15.09% | 10.42% | 26.32% | 65.22% | 0% | 35.29% | 41.67% | 24.61% | -25.92% | 31.58% | 119.56% | -7.79% | 159.57% | 88% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | -1.16 | -0.47 | 0.53 | 0.87 | 0.79 | -1.21 | 0.20 | -0.10 | -0.11 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 431.94M | 426.57M | 432.25M | 451.01M | 444.53M | 454.09M | 454.09M | 454.27M | 445.81M | 440.73M | 444.9M | 441.74M | 438.76M | 431.92M | 561.37M | 420.21M | 410.26M | 405.2M | 399.12M | 399.67M | 396.7M | 317.49M | 294.19M | 273.17M | 263.74M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 427.77M | 426.57M | 432.25M | 440.32M | 444.53M | 454.09M | 453.87M | 450.96M | 445.81M | 440.73M | 436.33M | 431M | 426.45M | 421.39M | 418.4M | 412.56M | 406.38M | 398.78M | 388.55M | 384.17M | 375.86M | 297.59M | 280.99M | 256.85M | 249.6M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying UAA stock.
For fiscal year 2026, Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) reported total revenue of $4.97B. This represents a 9922.9% increase compared to $49.5M in 2003.
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) reported a net loss of $495.6M for the fiscal year ending 2026.
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) reported an operating income of $-35.4M, resulting in an operating profit margin of -0.7%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) generated $2.26B in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 45.5%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative margins and leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Revenue Decline Persists Across Quarters
Under Armour's revenue contracted 3.4% year-over-year in 2027Q1, continuing a multi-quarter slide. According to the latest income statement data, the company has posted negative growth for nine consecutive quarters, with the most recent quarter showing $1.1B in revenue.
The revenue trajectory remains firmly negative, with the 2027Q1 decline of 3.4% following a pattern of contractions ranging from -0.6% to -11.6% over the prior eight quarters. This persistent decline suggests a structural demand issue rather than a temporary cyclical dip, as the company's wholesale-heavy model faces headwinds in North America. The lack of any quarter with positive growth in the provided data indicates that the brand's repositioning efforts have yet to gain traction, and investors should monitor whether the upcoming fiscal year can break this trend.
Gross Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Pressure
Gross margin improved to 54.1% in 2027Q1, up from 42.0% in 2026Q4, but this volatility suggests promotional activity and inventory management swings. As reported in the financial statements, the average gross margin over the last five quarters is approximately 47.5%, below the 50% threshold typical for premium athletic brands.
The gross margin spike in 2027Q1 appears to be driven by a favorable product mix and reduced discounting, yet the prior quarter's 42.0% margin highlights the instability caused by inventory liquidation and wholesale channel pressures. Compared to peers like Columbia Sportswear (50.2%) and Crocs (57.0%), Under Armour's gross margin is structurally lower, reflecting its heavy reliance on wholesale distribution and a less efficient DTC mix. The inability to sustain margins above 50% suggests limited pricing power in a competitive environment, and the recent improvement may be temporary if promotional activity resumes.
Operating Leverage Remains Elusive
Operating income swung from a $298.7M profit in 2026Q1 to a $46.7M profit in 2027Q1, but the 2026Q3 loss of $67.7M underscores the lack of consistent operating leverage. Based on the income statement data, SG&A expenses have not scaled down proportionally with revenue, keeping operating margins near breakeven.
The operating margin in 2027Q1 was 4.3%, a sharp improvement from the -5.1% in 2026Q3, but this volatility indicates that fixed costs, particularly SG&A, are not being managed effectively relative to revenue fluctuations. The 2026Q1 operating margin of 26.3% appears anomalous, likely due to a one-time gain or cost reduction, as subsequent quarters reverted to low single-digit or negative margins. This suggests that the company lacks the cost flexibility to maintain profitability during demand downturns, and the high fixed cost base, including marketing commitments, continues to weigh on operating income.
Net Income Distorted by Non-Operating Charges
Net income in 2027Q1 was only $545K despite a $46.7M operating profit, implying significant non-operating expenses. As per the income statement, the 2026Q3 net loss of $430.8M dwarfs the operating loss, suggesting large one-time charges or impairments that cloud underlying profitability.
The gap between operating income and net income in several quarters indicates that non-operating items, such as interest expense, taxes, or restructuring charges, are materially impacting the bottom line. For instance, 2026Q1 had an operating profit of $298.7M but a net loss of $2.6M, which suggests a massive tax provision or other below-the-line charges. This pattern raises questions about the quality of reported earnings, as the company's core operations are not consistently generating shareholder value. Investors should scrutinize the nature of these charges to assess whether they are recurring or one-time in nature.
SG&A Burden Outpaces Revenue Decline
SG&A expenses in 2027Q1 were $543.1M, representing 49.4% of revenue, up from 45.5% in 2025Q1. According to the income statement data, SG&A has not been cut proportionally to the revenue decline, indicating a structural cost problem.
The SG&A-to-revenue ratio has trended upward over the past year, from 45.5% in 2025Q1 to 49.4% in 2027Q1, despite management's stated focus on cost discipline. This suggests that fixed costs, including marketing and corporate overhead, are not being reduced fast enough to offset the revenue contraction. The 2026Q1 SG&A of $256.0M appears unusually low, possibly due to a one-time adjustment, but the subsequent quarters show a return to higher levels. The inability to align SG&A with revenue is a primary driver of the negative operating margins, and without aggressive cost restructuring, profitability will remain elusive.
Turnaround Narrative Faces Structural Hurdles
Despite the recent gross margin improvement, the company's negative net margin of -10.0% and high debt-to-equity ratio of 1.37 suggest limited financial flexibility. As reported in the latest financials, the persistent revenue decline and cost structure misalignment may indicate that the turnaround is not progressing as hoped.
Short-sellers would argue that the company's core problem is not cyclical but structural, as the brand's performance-focused positioning has lost relevance in the athleisure era. The negative ROE of -30.0% and the inability to generate consistent operating profits despite revenue stabilization attempts point to a business model that may require a radical overhaul. The recent EPS miss and lowered guidance further support the view that the demand environment remains weak, and the company's high leverage limits its ability to invest in growth initiatives. While the gross margin improvement is encouraging, it may be a temporary result of inventory management rather than a sustainable pricing power shift, and the market should remain cautious about the durability of any recovery.