Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 23.4x · EV/EBITDA 15.1x · ROE 23.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.1B | $3.4B | $3.8B | $1.3B | $800M | $731M | $643M | $508M | $398M | $431M | $422M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.8B | $3.1B | $3.5B | $1.1B | $672M | $629M | $562M | $456M | $331M | $346M | $347M |
| P/E Ratio → | 23.43 | 25.64 | 35.02 | 17.65 | 17.59 | 19.69 | 22.80 | 19.42 | 20.29 | 15.90 | 23.67 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.42 | 9.23 | 11.99 | 4.67 | 3.39 | 3.86 | 4.00 | 3.21 | 2.75 | 2.97 | 3.03 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.98 | 5.45 | 7.65 | 3.34 | 2.49 | 2.63 | 2.64 | 2.34 | 1.78 | 2.10 | 2.35 |
| P/FCF | 30.68 | 33.64 | 38.62 | 22.66 | 21.29 | 28.37 | 15.51 | 25.49 | — | 33.28 | 20.91 |
| P/OCF | 19.02 | 20.86 | 30.22 | 14.25 | 12.42 | 13.13 | 10.98 | 10.80 | 10.27 | 12.57 | 11.15 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.25 | 11.13 | 4.02 | 2.84 | 3.32 | 3.49 | 2.88 | 2.29 | 2.39 | 2.49 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.14 | 16.79 | 23.71 | 10.36 | 8.73 | 9.35 | 10.50 | 9.74 | 8.79 | 8.48 | 8.77 |
| EV / EBIT | 17.55 | 17.97 | 25.92 | 12.13 | 11.82 | 13.45 | 16.36 | 14.66 | 15.16 | 13.73 | 14.79 |
| EV / FCF | — | 30.05 | 35.85 | 19.52 | 17.89 | 24.41 | 13.55 | 22.93 | — | 26.72 | 17.21 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 48.8% | 45.3% | 36.6% | 29.8% | 31.3% | 29.6% | 26.3% | 21.1% | 23.7% | 23.8% |
| Operating Margin | 42.4% | 42.4% | 39.3% | 30.4% | 23.2% | 24.5% | 21.1% | 18.5% | 13.8% | 16.7% | 16.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 36.0% | 36.0% | 34.3% | 26.5% | 19.2% | 19.6% | 17.6% | 16.5% | 13.6% | 18.7% | 12.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 23.8% | 23.8% | 24.4% | 20.9% | 15.2% | 14.2% | 12.3% | 11.8% | 9.2% | 14.1% | 10.3% |
| ROA | 21.9% | 21.9% | 22.1% | 18.4% | 13.3% | 12.4% | 10.7% | 10.6% | 8.3% | 12.4% | 8.7% |
| ROIC | 48.5% | 48.5% | 43.0% | 31.7% | 22.3% | 20.6% | 15.5% | 13.6% | 10.9% | 16.1% | 16.6% |
| ROCE | 26.6% | 26.6% | 26.3% | 22.0% | 16.7% | 16.2% | 13.4% | 12.3% | 8.8% | 11.5% | 12.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.07 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.58 | -0.55 | -0.46 | -0.40 | -0.37 | -0.33 | -0.24 | -0.30 | -0.41 | -0.42 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -2.01 | -2.01 | -1.83 | -1.67 | -1.66 | -1.52 | -1.52 | -1.09 | -1.79 | -2.08 | -1.89 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -3.59 | -2.77 | -3.15 | -3.40 | -3.96 | -1.96 | -2.57 | — | -6.57 | -3.70 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | 223.69 | 187.07 | 138.39 | 127.64 | 89.76 | 104.50 | 95.45 |
Net cash position: cash ($371M) exceeds total debt ($4M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 19.27 | 19.27 | 20.92 | 14.58 | 12.23 | 13.45 | 10.70 | 9.80 | 12.73 | 12.61 | 11.53 |
| Quick Ratio | 17.96 | 17.96 | 19.28 | 13.19 | 10.97 | 12.09 | 9.39 | 8.39 | 11.12 | 11.16 | 10.17 |
| Cash Ratio | 15.70 | 15.70 | 16.39 | 10.75 | 8.58 | 9.42 | 7.21 | 5.74 | 8.44 | 9.08 | 8.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.66 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.17 | 6.17 | 6.28 | 7.34 | 8.47 | 8.60 | 7.44 | 8.71 | 8.87 | 8.15 | 8.54 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 46.94 | 50.53 | 49.37 | 51.92 | 51.52 | 52.19 | 53.88 | 49.54 | 41.51 | 43.98 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.7% | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.3% | 6.1% | 10.0% | 9.8% | 12.8% | 11.6% | 15.4% | 11.1% | 15.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.3% | 3.9% | 2.9% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 5.1% | 4.4% | 5.1% | 4.9% | 6.3% | 4.2% |
| FCF Yield | 3.3% | 3.0% | 2.6% | 4.4% | 4.7% | 3.5% | 6.4% | 3.9% | — | 3.0% | 4.8% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $29M | $29M | $29M | $28M | $28M | $28M | $28M | $28M | $28M | $28M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying USLM stock.
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 23.4x. The historical average is 11.5x. This places it at the 86th percentile of its historical range.
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.5x.
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 23.8%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 12.9%.
Based on historical data, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 23.4x. This is at the 86th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.22% with a payout ratio of 5.1%.
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. has 48.8% gross margin and 42.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Barnett Shale royalty decline
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margins Defy Materials Norms
USLM's gross margin held at 47.1% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, far exceeding aggregates peers like Martin Marietta and Vulcan, underscoring a high-value product mix and pricing power.
The stability of gross margin around 47% despite energy cost volatility suggests that pricing power in the lime segment is more than offsetting input inflation. Operating margin of 41.0% in 2026Q2, per the data, indicates that SG&A discipline and operating leverage are amplifying the high gross margin into exceptional profitability. However, the passive Barnett Shale royalty stream, which carries near-100% margins, may be inflating the reported net margin of 34.8%, so investors should monitor the core lime segment's standalone profitability.
High Returns Masked by Cash Drag
ROIC of 10.6% in 2026Q2, based on reported figures, appears modest for a company with 23.8% ROE, but the $402.6M cash pile earning minimal returns distorts the true operating efficiency.
The gap between ROE and ROIC is largely attributable to the massive cash balance, which represents over half of total assets and earns a negligible return. Excluding cash, the operating business likely generates returns on invested capital in the high teens, as suggested by the 13.7% ROIC in 2025Q3 when cash was relatively lower. This implies that management's conservative capital allocation is suppressing reported returns, and any deployment of cash into higher-yielding assets or shareholder returns could unlock value.
Working Capital Stretch Reflects Pricing Power
Cash conversion cycle extended to 90 days in 2026Q2, as per the data, driven by DSO of 55 and DIO of 54, while DPO of 19 suggests limited supplier leverage.
The CCC has hovered in the 80-95 day range over the past ten quarters, indicating a stable but relatively long cash cycle typical of industrial materials. The low DPO of 19 days suggests USLM pays suppliers promptly, possibly to secure supply or due to limited bargaining power, which is unusual for a company with such strong margins. The slight increase in DSO to 55 days may reflect customers taking longer to pay, but given the company's pricing power, this is likely a manageable trade-off rather than a sign of deteriorating receivables quality.
Debt-Free Balance Sheet Eliminates Refinancing Risk
With a D/E ratio of 0.00 and interest coverage not applicable, USLM's balance sheet, as reported in recent filings, shows no debt service burden, making it immune to rate hikes.
Total debt of $3.2M against $402.6M in cash means the company has net cash of nearly $400M, providing an extraordinary cushion against any operational downturn. The D/EBITDA of 0.08 is negligible, and the absence of interest expense suggests that earnings are entirely available to shareholders. This fortress-like leverage profile is a key differentiator versus peers like Martin Marietta (D/E 0.53) and Vulcan (D/E 0.63), and it implies that USLM could fund a large acquisition or special dividend without straining its balance sheet.
Liquidity Cushion Absorbs Cyclical Shocks
Current ratio of 27.54 in 2026Q2, as per the data, reflects a cash hoard that covers 125 times total debt, providing unmatched ability to weather demand or energy price shocks.
The quick ratio of 25.78 indicates that even if inventory became obsolete, the company could cover all current liabilities nearly 26 times over. This liquidity is not just defensive; it also provides strategic flexibility to invest counter-cyclically or return capital. However, the sheer size of the cash balance (53.9% of assets) suggests that management is forgoing higher returns, and shareholders may pressure for a more efficient capital structure.
P/E Misleads on Cyclicality
The P/E of 25.23, based on TTM earnings, may overstate risk for a company with non-discretionary end-markets like water treatment and flue gas desulfurization, which provide earnings durability.
Investors often apply a cyclical multiple to USLM as if it were a pure construction materials play, but the mix of municipal and environmental demand suggests a more stable earnings stream. The PEG of 0.70, per the data, indicates that the market is pricing in low growth, yet revenue grew 17.3% YoY, implying that the market may be underestimating the company's growth potential. A better metric would be EV/EBITDA, which at 16.45 is still premium but reflects the high-margin royalty income and low capital intensity of that segment. Analysts should adjust for the cash pile and royalty stream to derive a 'clean' operating multiple.