Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.2x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -183.4%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $166M | $227M | — | — | — | $3M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $168M | $228M | — | — | — | $-184682133 | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.89 | 4.93 | — | — | — | 0.12 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.41 | 5.94 | — | — | — | 0.03 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.95 | — | — | — | -6.73 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -16.1% | -16.1% | -5.1% | -33.9% | 1.1% | 18.1% | 33.6% | 31.7% |
| Operating Margin | -119.5% | -119.5% | -192.2% | -172.1% | -135.1% | -210.5% | -111.8% | -166.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -155.2% | -155.2% | -170.1% | -174.5% | 10.1% | -390.3% | -114.9% | -168.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -183.4% | -183.4% | -129.2% | -130.5% | 6.4% | -8256.8% | — | -2481.0% |
| ROA | -73.4% | -73.4% | -57.4% | -71.7% | 3.0% | -63.9% | -80.3% | -118.7% |
| ROIC | -87.9% | -87.9% | -82.2% | -91.2% | -306.8% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -89.5% | -89.5% | -100.8% | -94.5% | -49.1% | -41.8% | -141.7% | -270.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.40 | 0.67 | 0.16 | 0.18 | — | 8.01 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.03 | 0.37 | 0.31 | -0.07 | -1.70 | — | -1.48 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -15.33 | -15.33 | -3.37 | -12.90 | 22.42 | -38.08 | -33.13 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.34 | 2.34 | 1.52 | 2.43 | 3.72 | 5.75 | 2.30 | 1.53 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.52 | 1.18 | 2.18 | 5.26 | 1.70 | 1.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.21 | 1.21 | 0.03 | 0.64 | 1.74 | 4.78 | 1.28 | 0.80 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.09 | 0.58 | 0.70 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.97 | 1.97 | — | 1.71 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.72 | 2.28 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 65.91 | 37.59 | 104.68 | 67.65 | 173.62 | 82.04 | 60.28 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16M | $847260 | $375921 | $385095 | $349014 | $82142 | $16M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VELO stock.
Velo3D, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -3.2x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Velo3D, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -183.4%. The historical average is -109.2%.
Based on historical data, Velo3D, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -3.2x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Velo3D, Inc. has -16.1% gross margin and -119.5% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash runway and negative gross margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Recovery Masks Structural Losses
According to the latest quarterly data, VELO's gross margin swung to 21.5% in 2026Q2 from -73.6% in 2025Q4, yet operating margin remains deeply negative at -53.5%, indicating fixed costs still overwhelm revenue.
The dramatic improvement in gross margin suggests a reset cost base following the 2025Q4 restructuring, but the persistent operating loss implies that SG&A and R&D expenses are not being absorbed by the current revenue scale. Even with the 52.3% YoY revenue surge, the company loses $0.54 on every dollar of sales at the operating level, underscoring that the business model has not yet achieved the volume needed for profitability. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin can sustain above breakeven as revenue mix shifts toward services and software.
Capital Efficiency Remains Elusive
As reported in the financial statements, ROIC improved to -14.9% in 2026Q2 from -74.8% in 2025Q4, but the ten-quarter average of roughly -30% indicates persistent value destruction relative to invested capital.
The improvement in ROIC is largely a function of the capital infusion that boosted equity and reduced leverage, not operational profitability. With negative gross margins on a trailing basis and operating losses, the company is not generating returns that cover its cost of capital. The extreme ROE figures, such as -2087.8% in 2025Q4, reflect the thin equity base and massive losses, suggesting that any positive return on capital is unlikely without a fundamental shift in cost structure or pricing power.
Working Capital Cycle Stretched by Inventory
Based on the latest quarterly data, VELO's cash conversion cycle shortened to 162 days in 2026Q2 from 355 days in 2025Q1, but inventory days of 156 remain elevated, tying up cash in slow-moving hardware.
The improvement in CCC is driven by faster collection on receivables (DSO down to 46 days from 201 in 2024Q1) and extended payables, but the inventory position suggests that older Sapphire models may be at risk of obsolescence as the company transitions to newer platforms. The high DIO of 156 days indicates that a significant portion of the balance sheet is tied up in unsold units, which could lead to write-downs if demand softens. This inefficiency is particularly concerning given the company's limited cash runway.
Deleveraging Provides Temporary Relief
According to the balance sheet data, VELO's debt-to-equity ratio fell to 0.02 in 2026Q2 from 0.35 in 2026Q1, with total debt down to $3.2M, but interest coverage remains negative at -63.21, indicating earnings cannot service debt.
The sharp reduction in leverage appears to be the result of a capital raise that boosted equity, rather than organic debt repayment. While the lower debt load reduces near-term solvency risk, the negative interest coverage ratio signals that operating losses are still far from covering interest expenses. The company's ability to refinance or access additional capital may be constrained by its negative gross margins and history of cash burn, making the current low leverage a fragile state.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Runway Uncertain
As reported in the latest quarter, VELO's current ratio improved to 6.33 in 2026Q2 from 2.45 in 2026Q1, with cash of $91.1M, but the quick ratio of 5.22 suggests inventory is not a major liquidity concern.
The substantial cash balance provides a cushion against near-term obligations, but the source of this cash—likely a capital infusion—raises questions about sustainability. With negative operating cash flow in most quarters and a cumulative burn of over $58M in the last five quarters, the current liquidity may only fund operations for a limited period. The high current ratio is partly due to inventory, but the quick ratio indicates that even without selling inventory, the company can cover current liabilities, offering some comfort.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in a Pre-Revenue Context
The most commonly misapplied ratio for VELO is EV/EBITDA, which at 116.4 appears meaningless given negative EBITDA; instead, investors should focus on cash burn and gross margin trajectory as more relevant metrics.
EV/EBITDA is typically used to value companies with positive EBITDA, but VELO's deeply negative EBITDA makes the multiple uninformative and potentially misleading. The market appears to be pricing VELO based on cash runway and strategic value, not earnings power. A more appropriate metric is the price-to-cash ratio or the enterprise value relative to the remaining cash runway, which would better capture the company's near-term solvency risk. Investors should also monitor the gross margin trend, as it is the key driver of whether the business can eventually achieve profitability.