Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -5.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -47.3%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.1B | $4.0B | $4.4B | $1.8B | $722M | $355M | $409M | $577M | $440M | $105M | $19M |
| Enterprise Value | $3.0B | $3.8B | $4.4B | $1.7B | $687M | $329M | $380M | $569M | $416M | $100M | $20M |
| P/E Ratio → | -5.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 4.73 | 6.20 | 4.98 | 5.04 | 4.97 | 1.76 | 1.67 | 2.08 | 1.48 | 7.83 | 2.41 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -47.3% | -47.3% | -17.9% | -34.8% | -39.7% | -24.6% | -15.1% | -9.0% | -14.2% | -191.4% | -175.7% |
| ROA | -44.3% | -44.3% | -17.2% | -32.0% | -36.3% | -23.5% | -14.6% | -8.8% | -13.6% | -112.3% | -98.3% |
| ROIC | -44.4% | -44.4% | -19.7% | -37.4% | -36.9% | -21.4% | -13.2% | -9.0% | -14.0% | -177.0% | -113.2% |
| ROCE | -51.8% | -51.8% | -24.5% | -40.7% | -40.4% | -25.0% | -16.4% | -11.4% | -16.8% | -177.2% | -128.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | 0.26 | 0.41 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.26 | -0.03 | -0.16 | -0.24 | -0.13 | -0.12 | -0.03 | -0.08 | -0.41 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | -1168.82 | -975.08 | -1166.24 | -3054.00 | -371.59 | -175.57 | -38.26 | -9.55 | -6.25 |
Net cash position: cash ($166M) exceeds total debt ($137000)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.33 | 9.33 | 33.09 | 19.19 | 7.61 | 23.98 | 21.11 | 41.83 | 66.40 | 2.52 | 2.16 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.33 | 9.33 | 33.09 | 19.19 | 7.61 | 23.98 | 21.11 | 41.83 | 66.40 | 2.52 | 2.16 |
| Cash Ratio | 9.21 | 9.21 | 32.93 | 18.92 | 7.08 | 23.02 | 20.48 | 40.67 | 66.27 | 2.38 | 2.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $113M | $109M | $94M | $77M | $77M | $73M | $72M | $58M | $26M | $16M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VKTX stock.
Viking Therapeutics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -5.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Viking Therapeutics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -47.3%. The historical average is -76.2%.
Based on historical data, Viking Therapeutics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -5.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash runway dependent on dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Book Value Premium Without Earnings Support
As reported in recent SEC filings, VKTX trades at 4.73 times book value with a trailing P/E of -8.41, meaning the market is pricing a commercial future that current reported earnings do not yet reflect.
With no reported revenue and negative earnings, conventional earnings and EV-based multiples are not meaningful for VKTX, leaving price-to-book as the only usable anchor. A 4.73 P/B against a retained deficit of roughly -$1.3B suggests the equity value rests almost entirely on paid-in capital and pipeline expectations rather than demonstrated cash generation. Investors should monitor whether the premium narrows as clinical milestones are reached or whether it compresses if dilution continues.
Minimal Debt Masks Dilution Dependence
Based on reported figures, VKTX's debt-to-equity ratio of 0.43 in 2026Q3 appears modest, though interest coverage of -2080.66 reflects operating losses rather than any meaningful debt service capacity.
The low D/E ratio is driven by a large equity base refreshed through external raises rather than by any proven earnings capacity, so it reflects a capital structure built on issuance rather than leverage management. Interest coverage is negative and not informative about debt service comfort, since EBIT is deeply negative. The relevant risk is refinancing or raising capital on dilutive terms if the free cash flow deficit persists, which warrants further investigation.
Cash Buffer Measured Against Quarterly Burn
As reported in financial statements, VKTX's current ratio of 7.27 and cash balance of $677.6M in 2026Q3 appear strong, but must be weighed against a free cash flow deficit of roughly -$138.2M per quarter.
Headline liquidity looks robust, yet the current ratio is flattered by the absence of current liabilities relative to a large cash position and does not capture burn velocity. At the reported quarterly deficit, the cash balance implies a multi-quarter runway that may shorten quickly as R&D spending scales. Investors should monitor cash runway and the timing of any further equity raises rather than relying on the static ratio.
Deepening Negative Returns on Capital
Based on EDBL's reported figures, VKTX's ROIC deteriorated from -3.2% in 2024Q3 to -62.0% in 2026Q3, and ROE similarly fell to -36.8%, indicating capital is being consumed rather than compounded.
The decline in ROIC and ROE tracks the expansion of operating losses faster than the growth of the invested capital base, so the ratios are being driven by the margin side of the equation rather than by any efficiency gain. Because no revenue is reported, margins are not meaningful and the ratios simply reflect the scale of spending relative to equity. Investors should monitor whether returns stabilize once spending plateaus, as the current trajectory implies continued value dilution per dollar invested.
Peer Comparison Shows Shared Loss Profile
According to peer data, VKTX's ROE of -23.3% and ROIC of -22.7% sit broadly in line with clinical-stage peers such as KYMR and TERN, suggesting the negative return profile is sector-typical rather than company-specific.
VKTX's price-to-book of 4.73 is elevated relative to PEPG at 0.71 and GPCR at 0.79, though closer to KYMR at 7.04, indicating the market prices VKTX's pipeline optionality at a premium to some peers. Its D/E of 0.43 sits above most peers, which carry near-zero leverage, so its relative weakness is in capital structure rather than return profile. These gaps appear structural to the stage of development rather than temporary, though investors should verify against each company's pipeline stage.
Headline Liquidity May Overstate Durability
Based on reported figures, the 7.27 current ratio and $677.6M cash balance may overstate VKTX's durable financial strength given no reported revenue and a quarterly free cash flow deficit near -$138.2M.
The strongest case against a constructive reading is that liquidity ratios are static snapshots while the cash deficit is accelerating, so a seemingly comfortable balance sheet can erode within a few reporting periods. The ratios do not incorporate scheduled development commitments or the timing of future equity issuance, which may determine actual runway. Investors should prioritize multi-quarter cash burn trends and dilution risk over the current ratio when assessing solvency.