Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -4.1x · EV/EBITDA 6.0x · ROE -33.1%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $912M | $1.0B | $856M | $1.1B | $975M | $2.1B | $1.3B | $1.1B | $541M | $812M | $1.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.0B | $4.1B | $3.8B | $3.9B | $3.2B | $4.1B | $3.2B | $2.9B | $429M | $635M | $1.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | -4.15 | — | 6.76 | 140.00 | — | 20.19 | — | 7.44 | — | — | 8.85 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.95 | 23.46 | 11.12 | 7.54 | 12.77 | 27.88 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.48 | 3.90 | 2.35 | 4.51 | 4.15 | 6.65 | 9.03 | 3.66 | 1.16 | 1.57 | 2.92 |
| P/FCF | 1.28 | 1.37 | 1.69 | 4.58 | 3.75 | 3.56 | 24.96 | 3.38 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 1.22 | 1.37 | 0.79 | 1.50 | 1.59 | 2.67 | 5.93 | 2.11 | 18.80 | 16.17 | 32.22 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.36 | 1.22 | 1.19 | 1.14 | 1.86 | 60.10 | 30.39 | 5.97 | 9.99 | 23.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.98 | 5.46 | 3.94 | 5.48 | 7.34 | 5.64 | 12.04 | 9.90 | 32.01 | 19.71 | 166.47 |
| EV / EBIT | 40.59 | 21.33 | 8.08 | 17.25 | 54.88 | 14.87 | — | 176.21 | 282.17 | 122.32 | 110.63 |
| EV / FCF | — | 5.50 | 7.56 | 16.24 | 12.50 | 6.93 | 63.94 | 9.24 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 5.7% | 5.7% | 16.4% | 15.5% | 8.6% | 24.9% | -2.4% | 19.0% | 9.1% | 15.6% | 19.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 3.3% | 12.1% | 6.5% | 0.8% | 18.0% | -12.4% | 12.5% | 2.0% | 5.0% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -3.4% | -3.4% | 4.0% | 0.2% | -2.8% | 4.8% | -17.8% | 7.6% | -3.5% | 1.1% | 14.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -33.1% | -33.1% | 41.6% | 3.3% | -29.2% | 46.7% | -4.5% | 1.9% | -0.5% | 0.1% | 1.8% |
| ROA | -1.8% | -1.8% | 2.3% | 0.2% | -1.9% | 2.9% | -0.3% | 0.3% | -0.2% | 0.1% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 2.2% | 2.2% | 8.9% | 5.7% | 0.8% | 13.5% | -0.2% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% |
| ROCE | 2.6% | 2.6% | 10.2% | 6.4% | 0.8% | 15.6% | -0.3% | 0.8% | 0.2% | 0.5% | 1.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 14.66 | 14.66 | 10.61 | 14.61 | 12.70 | 8.68 | 17.71 | 7.82 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.19 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.10 | 5.10 | 3.98 | 5.01 | 6.74 | 3.78 | 9.22 | 7.72 | 13.86 | 5.51 | 12.63 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 11.79 | 8.15 | 11.47 | 9.67 | 6.31 | 14.09 | 6.35 | -0.24 | -0.34 | -0.47 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.11 | 4.11 | 3.06 | 3.94 | 5.13 | 2.75 | 7.34 | 6.28 | -8.42 | -5.48 | -31.84 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.14 | 5.87 | 11.66 | 8.74 | 3.37 | 38.98 | 5.86 | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.62 | 0.62 | 1.61 | 1.03 | 0.31 | 1.97 | -0.06 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 1.14 | 6.81 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 1.21 | 1.43 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 0.68 | 0.97 | 1.18 | 1.41 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.59 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.91 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
| Inventory Turnover | 168.45 | 168.45 | 157.90 | 170.86 | 117.17 | 71.58 | 3.95 | 4.82 | 4.32 | 3.57 | 3.74 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 31.48 | 16.13 | 28.07 | 31.23 | 18.70 | 686.20 | 471.49 | 379.29 | 423.88 | 310.68 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 14.8% | 0.7% | — | 5.0% | — | 13.4% | — | — | 11.3% |
| FCF Yield | 78.2% | 73.1% | 59.2% | 21.8% | 26.6% | 28.1% | 4.0% | 29.6% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $116M | $115M | $117M | $117M | $117M | $102M | $101M | $101M | $101M | $101M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VLRS stock.
Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V.'s current P/E ratio is -4.1x. The historical average is 34.2x.
Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V.'s current EV/EBITDA is 6.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.3x.
Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V.'s return on equity (ROE) is -33.1%. The historical average is 2.1%.
Based on historical data, Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V. is trading at a P/E of -4.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V. has 5.7% gross margin and 3.3% operating margin.
Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage on shrinking equity base
Negative Earnings Distort Multiples
Based on reported figures, VLRS trades at a trailing P/E of -0.88 and EV/EBITDA of 5.31, with P/B of 0.35, suggesting the market prices the equity near a fraction of book value despite negative earnings.
The negative trailing P/E renders earnings-based comparison meaningless, so EV/EBITDA of 5.31 and P/FCF of 1.22 carry more weight, and the low P/FCF suggests the market is discounting cash generation heavily. A P/B of 0.35 combined with collapsing equity implies investors doubt the durability of the book value and may be pricing in further write-downs. Forward EV/EBITDA of 6.16 sits above the trailing figure, which may indicate analysts expect EBITDA to contract, warranting monitoring of consensus revisions.
Margins Oscillate Without Durable Recovery
According to reported quarterly figures, VLRS gross margin moved from 17.1% in 2024Q4 to -6.8% in 2026Q2 and 3.9% in 2026Q3, indicating unit economics have not stabilized after the recent operational disruption.
The 2026Q3 rebound to 3.9% gross and 3.3% operating margin remains far below the 15.5% operating margin posted in 2024Q3, implying the cost base has grown faster than revenue over the period. Net margin of -2.5% in the latest quarter and an ROE of -47.3% suggest that even modest operating gains are being absorbed by below-the-line charges. Operating income is therefore a weaker guide to earning power than usual, and investors should watch whether the recovery persists across consecutive quarters.
Returns Decay Into Negative Territory
Based on reported ratios, VLRS ROIC fell from 2.9% in 2024Q3 to -2.3% in 2026Q2 before reaching 0.8% in 2026Q3, indicating the company has not been compounding invested capital over the past two years.
ROE swings from 12.2% in 2024Q3 to -92.4% in 2026Q2 are amplified by a shrinking equity denominator rather than purely by earnings, so the ROE trend overstates the severity of deterioration relative to ROIC. The modest ROIC recovery to 0.8% sits well below the cost of capital for a leveraged carrier, suggesting that returns on the capital base may not justify continued fleet investment without margin normalization. Investors should treat ROIC as the more reliable signal here.
Debt Burden Versus Thin Equity
According to reported ratios, VLRS debt-to-equity reached 90.33 in 2026Q3 versus 10.61 in 2024Q4, while interest coverage has been erratic, moving from 2.10 to negative in 2026Q2, indicating debt service comfort has eroded sharply.
The leverage ratio is inflated by a collapsing equity base, but the direction is unambiguous: debt has remained large while the equity cushion has largely disappeared. Negative interest coverage in 2026Q2 implies operating earnings did not cover interest expense in that period, which may raise refinancing sensitivity, though the data does not confirm specific covenant terms. Debt-to-EBITDA of 18.17 in 2026Q3 further suggests that repayment capacity depends heavily on sustained EBITDA recovery.
Cash Conversion Masks Earnings Weakness
Based on reported figures, VLRS free cash flow margin of 22.5% in 2026Q3 contrasts sharply with a net margin of -2.5%, which may overstate the durability of the cash profile if working capital inflows reverse.
The gap between strong free cash flow margins and negative net margins suggests that non-cash charges and working capital timing are carrying much of the cash generation. Current ratio of 0.67 and quick ratio of 0.66 indicate that short-term obligations exceed liquid assets, so reliance on working capital inflows could become a constraint if those flows reverse. Investors should monitor whether free cash flow persists as earnings remain negative, since the P/FCF of 1.22 is only attractive if the cash generation proves recurring.