Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -45.3x · EV/EBITDA 15.6x · ROE -4.5%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.9B | $665M | $2.0B | $2.5B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3.2B | $2.1B | $3.3B | $4.2B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -45.26 | — | 93.13 | 11.84 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.68 | 0.24 | 0.70 | 0.89 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.14 | 0.77 | 2.17 | 2.88 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 321.27 | 115.33 | 5.00 | 14.09 | — | — |
| P/OCF | 28.86 | 10.36 | 4.16 | 9.82 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.75 | 1.18 | 1.48 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.63 | 9.90 | 11.09 | 11.78 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 50.32 | 42.83 | 20.89 | 15.36 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 356.09 | 8.43 | 23.31 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 26.5% | 26.5% | 29.1% | 30.3% | 28.9% | 28.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 2.4% | 5.6% | 7.7% | 7.2% | 3.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1.5% | -1.5% | 0.7% | 7.5% | 5.3% | 3.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -4.5% | -4.5% | 2.4% | 13.3% | 6.1% | 3.2% |
| ROA | -1.4% | -1.4% | 0.7% | 6.8% | 4.5% | 2.4% |
| ROIC | 2.1% | 2.1% | 5.0% | 6.5% | 5.8% | 2.9% |
| ROCE | 2.6% | 2.6% | 6.0% | 7.9% | 7.0% | 3.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.64 | 1.64 | 1.53 | 1.92 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.84 | 6.84 | 4.62 | 4.76 | 0.56 | 0.79 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.60 | 1.49 | 1.88 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.70 | 6.70 | 4.52 | 4.66 | 0.49 | 0.61 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 240.76 | 3.43 | 9.22 | 1.01 | 0.91 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.52 | 0.52 | 1.25 | 27183.90 | 85.16 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.08 | 2.08 | 1.73 | 2.58 | 2.45 | 2.43 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 1.13 | 1.02 | 0.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.11 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.94 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.79 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.44 | 3.44 | 3.55 | 3.43 | 3.31 | 3.17 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 21.66 | 23.06 | 50.76 | 50.09 | 47.14 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.7% | 2.1% | 1.0% | 66.9% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 94.7% | 792.3% | 94.9% | 128.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 1.1% | 8.4% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.3% | 0.9% | 20.0% | 7.1% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.7% | 2.1% | 1.0% | 66.9% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $132M | $132M | $131M | $130M | $131M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VSTS stock.
Vestis Corporation's current P/E ratio is -45.3x. The historical average is 52.5x.
Vestis Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 15.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.9x.
Vestis Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -4.5%. The historical average is 4.1%.
Based on historical data, Vestis Corporation is trading at a P/E of -45.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Vestis Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.75%.
Vestis Corporation has 26.5% gross margin and 2.4% operating margin.
Vestis Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent revenue decline and thin margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Persists
Gross margin fell to 28.0% in Q3 2026 from 29.0% a year earlier, while operating margin improved to 5.6% but remains below the 6.1% peak in Q2 2024, according to recent SEC filings.
The sequential improvement in operating margin from 2.5% in Q1 2026 to 5.6% in Q3 2026 suggests cost discipline is partially offsetting revenue pressure, but the absolute level remains thin relative to peers like Cintas, which reports operating margins above 20%. The negative net margin in several quarters indicates that non-operating charges, likely including interest and spin-off related costs, are absorbing a disproportionate share of operating income. Investors should monitor whether the margin recovery is sustainable given management's lowered full-year guidance, which implies that the Q3 beat may be driven by one-off items or aggressive cost cuts rather than fundamental improvement.
Capital Returns Remain Subdued
ROIC improved to 1.7% in Q3 2026 from 0.6% a year earlier, but remains far below the cost of capital and peer averages, as reported in financial statements.
The ten-quarter trend shows ROIC oscillating between -0.3% and 1.7%, with no clear trajectory toward the double-digit returns generated by Cintas (26.7%) or even ABM (7.5%). The low returns appear driven by a combination of thin operating margins and a heavy asset base, as evidenced by asset turnover of just 0.23x, which is typical for the uniform rental industry but still below the 0.5x+ seen at more efficient operators. The recent improvement in ROIC is largely a function of the sharp debt reduction in Q3 2026, which lowered interest expense and boosted net income, but the underlying operating returns remain weak. Without a fundamental improvement in route density or mix shift toward higher-margin services, ROIC is unlikely to approach the cost of capital, suggesting the company is currently destroying value rather than compounding it.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle compressed to 25 days in Q3 2026 from 126 days in Q4 2024, driven by a sharp reduction in days inventory outstanding from 107 to 32, based on reported figures.
The dramatic improvement in DIO from over 100 days in 2024 to 32 days in Q3 2026 suggests management has aggressively reduced textile inventory levels, likely in response to the revenue decline. This has freed up significant cash, contributing to the positive free cash flow of $87.0M in Q3 2026, but it also raises questions about whether service levels can be maintained with a leaner inventory buffer. DSO has also improved from 53 days in Q4 2024 to 20 days in Q3 2026, indicating better collection discipline, while DPO has remained stable around 27 days. The overall CCC of 25 days is now competitive with industry norms, but the sustainability of these improvements is uncertain if revenue continues to contract, as further inventory reductions may not be possible without impacting customer service.
Leverage Drops Sharply
Debt-to-equity fell to 0.29 in Q3 2026 from 1.64 a year earlier, with total debt plummeting from $1.4B to $252.7M, according to recent balance sheet data.
The dramatic deleveraging in Q3 2026 appears to be a one-time event, possibly involving a debt repayment or refinancing, and it has significantly improved the company's solvency profile. Interest coverage improved to 1.71x from 0.55x in Q4 2025, but remains thin, indicating that operating income is barely sufficient to cover interest expense. The reported D/E of 0.29 is exceptionally low for this industry, and investors should verify whether off-balance-sheet lease obligations are fully captured, as the uniform rental business relies heavily on leased facilities and vehicles. The improved leverage provides a cushion, but the low interest coverage suggests that any further margin compression or rise in interest rates could strain debt service.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens
Current ratio improved to 2.17 in Q3 2026 from 1.73 in Q4 2024, while cash increased to $57.7M, indicating a stronger liquidity position, as per balance sheet data.
The current ratio of 2.17 is healthy and well above the 1.0 threshold, suggesting the company can comfortably meet short-term obligations. The quick ratio of 1.75 indicates that even without selling inventory, the company can cover current liabilities, which is reassuring given the inventory reductions. However, the improvement is partly due to the sharp decline in current liabilities, which may reflect reduced trade payables and accrued expenses as the business contracts. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a further 10% revenue decline, the liquidity position would likely remain adequate given the low debt levels, but the thin operating margins leave little room for error if cash flows deteriorate.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 15.53 appears elevated relative to peers, but this metric is distorted by the recent debt reduction and may not reflect the company's true earnings power, based on reported figures.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly used to value capital-intensive businesses like uniform rental, but for VSTS it is misleading because EBITDA is currently depressed due to spin-off related costs and revenue contraction. The forward EV/EBITDA of 11.25 suggests the market expects margin recovery, but the negative net margin and thin operating margin indicate that EBITDA may not normalize as quickly as anticipated. A more appropriate metric for VSTS would be EV/EBITDAR, which adds back rental expenses, or EV/Invested Capital, to better capture the asset intensity and the impact of off-balance-sheet leases. Investors should also consider the price-to-FCF multiple of 317.84, which highlights the volatility in free cash flow and the risk that current cash generation is not sustainable if working capital tailwinds reverse.