Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -186.7%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.4B | $2.0B | $28M | $422M | $1.2B | $1.5B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $7.4B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $2.4B | $2.0B | $27M | $419M | $1.1B | $1.5B | $2.4B | $2.8B | $7.3B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2970.61 | 2414.57 | 66.59 | 954.30 | 82653.53 | 68037.27 | 9260.53 | 392.03 | 1180.12 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 180.34 | 297.32 | 2.38 | 19.90 | 124.96 | 109.47 | 113.42 | 85.14 | 110.70 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2419.15 | 64.01 | 947.08 | 81520.74 | 67456.32 | 9187.09 | 390.49 | 1169.97 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 92.3% | 92.3% | 90.0% | 93.2% | -1050.0% | -6990.9% | -738.6% | -22.9% | 32.8% | 29.0% | 47.5% |
| Operating Margin | -1487.3% | -1487.3% | -2676.9% | -17674.0% | -192578.6% | -133027.3% | -13668.3% | -801.9% | -498.0% | -302.6% | -70.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | -2098.0% | -2098.0% | -3962.6% | -15966.5% | -191892.9% | -113954.5% | -13917.0% | -791.2% | -492.8% | -302.6% | -70.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -186.7% | -186.7% | -101.0% | -463.5% | -234.3% | -144.0% | -132.8% | -114.1% | -104.4% | — | — |
| ROA | -78.8% | -78.8% | -56.9% | -296.7% | -141.8% | -92.0% | -93.0% | -96.4% | -72.3% | -207.6% | -71.9% |
| ROIC | -86.7% | -86.7% | -58.8% | -1027.8% | — | -1454.6% | -219.5% | -342.2% | -721.3% | — | — |
| ROCE | -64.7% | -64.7% | -41.7% | -416.4% | -216.4% | -141.6% | -112.5% | -109.6% | -81.2% | -301.8% | -134.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.15 | 0.02 | — | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 0.01 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.57 | -0.09 | -0.15 | -1.71 | -0.93 | -0.90 | -0.33 | -0.95 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -68.41 | -68.41 | -147.37 | — | — | -2724.70 | -327.79 | -226.77 | -2200.57 | -4440.00 | -1399.33 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.10 | 0.10 | 1.58 | 1.68 | 2.22 | 3.17 | 3.56 | 5.28 | 11.64 | 3.81 | 1.96 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 1.56 | 1.67 | 2.22 | 2.99 | 3.45 | 4.88 | 11.28 | 3.36 | 1.64 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.38 | 1.44 | 2.09 | 2.79 | 3.08 | 4.49 | 10.81 | 3.13 | 1.45 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.52 | 1.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.27 | 0.68 | — | 1.58 | 2.48 | 3.19 | 2.01 | 3.48 | 3.61 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 69.08 | 60.83 | 113.13 | — | 348.41 | 33.82 | 39.85 | 77.00 | 32.15 | 24.00 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $1.1B | $3M | $5M | $1M | $101000 | $33980 | $10516 | $7384 | $9683 | $9683 |
Imminent liquidity exhaustion
According to recent market data, VTAK trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 2,970.61, a figure that appears to reflect extreme speculative pricing rather than fundamental business value, given the company's reported TTM revenue of only $819,000 and its precarious, near-zero cash position.
The astronomical P/S ratio suggests that investors are pricing the company as a binary option on the success of its VIVO technology rather than a traditional commercial entity. This valuation level warrants extreme caution, as it implies an expectation of rapid, non-linear growth that remains unproven by current clinical adoption metrics.
As reported in financial statements, VTAK maintains gross margins consistently exceeding 90%, yet this high variable profitability is entirely negated by an operating margin of -1487.30%, indicating that the firm has not yet achieved the necessary scale to absorb its heavy fixed R&D and clinical support costs.
The disconnect between high gross margins and deep operating losses suggests that the company's current business model is structurally incapable of self-funding. Investors should monitor whether the company can transition from high-touch clinical support to a more scalable, lower-cost sales model as the installed base grows.
Based on reported figures, VTAK's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -11.2% in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company is currently destroying invested capital rather than compounding it, a trend typical of early-stage medical device firms struggling to reach a sustainable commercial inflection point.
The persistent negative return on capital reflects the heavy burden of intangible assets and the lack of meaningful operating income. Without a significant increase in revenue to offset the capital base, these returns appear unlikely to turn positive in the near term, necessitating further capital injections.
According to quarterly data, VTAK exhibits erratic working capital cycles, with the cash conversion cycle fluctuating wildly between -157 and -5,584 days, suggesting that the company's operational efficiency is currently dominated by the timing of inventory procurement and the settlement of significant short-term liabilities.
The extreme volatility in the CCC indicates that the company lacks a stable, predictable operating rhythm. This inconsistency makes it difficult to assess the true underlying efficiency of the business, as the numbers are likely skewed by the early-stage nature of its product rollout and merger-related restructuring.
As indicated by the company's reported financial statements, the current ratio has deteriorated to 0.06 as of 2026Q1, highlighting a severe liquidity constraint that leaves the firm with virtually no buffer to cover its immediate short-term obligations without relying on external, potentially dilutive, capital sources.
The current liquidity position appears to be at a critical breaking point, suggesting that the company may face an imminent going-concern event. Investors should monitor the firm's ability to secure additional financing, as the current cash balance is insufficient to sustain operations for any meaningful duration.
Based on an analysis of the company's business model, the most commonly misapplied metric is the 95% YoY revenue growth rate, which obscures the underlying reality that the company is burning cash at a rate that far outpaces its current, very low-base revenue generation.
Analysts should prioritize the cash burn rate and liquidity runway over top-line growth, as the latter is largely irrelevant in the context of a company that may lack the capital to survive long enough to reach scale. The focus should shift to the 'pull-through' rate of disposables, which is a more reliable indicator of long-term viability than headline revenue growth.
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying VTAK stock.
Catheter Precision, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Catheter Precision, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -186.7%. The historical average is -185.1%.
Based on historical data, Catheter Precision, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Catheter Precision, Inc. has 92.3% gross margin and -1487.3% operating margin.