Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -15.6x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -343.7%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.5B | $4.6B | $2.0B | $504M | $74M | $1.3B | $20M | $11M | $17M | $15M | $23M |
| Enterprise Value | $12.5B | $6.5B | $2.2B | $574M | $202M | $1.3B | $109M | $12M | $18M | $17M | $25M |
| P/E Ratio → | -15.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 119.91 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 62.55 | 27.12 | 14.20 | 7.28 | 4.93 | — | 1.47 | 0.60 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 1.29 |
| P/B Ratio | 73.13 | 32.53 | 8.13 | 2.26 | 0.63 | 10.41 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 1.28 | 1.17 | 1.69 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26.47 | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | 118.20 | — | — | — | — | 13.65 | 73.76 | 24.77 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 38.57 | 15.75 | 8.29 | 13.45 | — | 8.12 | 0.71 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.68 | 42.01 | 32.19 |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 65.38 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.57 | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 50.9% | 55.3% | 60.5% | 26.3% | — | 29.1% | 30.6% | 34.3% | 33.2% | 35.5% |
| Operating Margin | -101.1% | -101.1% | -54.4% | -42.5% | -291.0% | — | -10.6% | -4.9% | 1.2% | -2.7% | -0.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -392.6% | -392.6% | -51.7% | -106.1% | -603.9% | — | -3.3% | -4.6% | 0.8% | -1.3% | -0.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -343.7% | -343.7% | -31.0% | -43.2% | -75.4% | -126.4% | -2.2% | -6.4% | 1.1% | -1.7% | -0.5% |
| ROA | -18.0% | -18.0% | -12.4% | -21.1% | -31.2% | -64.9% | -1.9% | -4.7% | 0.8% | -1.3% | -0.4% |
| ROIC | -4.2% | -4.2% | -10.6% | -7.4% | -14.1% | -19.0% | -1.5% | -4.2% | 1.1% | -2.1% | -0.1% |
| ROCE | -6.1% | -6.1% | -15.9% | -14.2% | -21.3% | -35.1% | -6.6% | -5.6% | 1.4% | -2.8% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 36.99 | 36.99 | 2.01 | 0.56 | 1.10 | 0.78 | 3.39 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.89 | 7.50 | 4.15 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 13.74 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 1.09 | 0.40 | 3.16 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.30 | 5.23 | 2.79 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.10 | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.19 | -7.19 | -3.97 | -0.84 | -1.86 | -19.25 | -0.23 | -9.94 | 3.05 | -5.31 | -0.19 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5.43 | 0.40 | 0.11 | 1.48 | 3.63 | 4.49 | 6.87 | 9.44 | 6.89 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5.43 | 0.40 | 0.11 | 1.48 | 3.63 | 4.49 | 6.87 | 9.44 | 6.89 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.88 | 1.88 | 5.29 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 1.01 | 3.62 | 0.50 | 1.25 | 1.06 | 0.80 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.05 | — | 0.45 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 0.96 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.8% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3.8% | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $398M | $351M | $210M | $111M | $85M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M | $2M |
Capital structure and dilution
Based on reported figures, TeraWulf trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 62.55, a valuation that appears disconnected from its negative net margins and suggests investors are pricing in significant future optionality rather than current fundamental performance compared to the broader capital markets peer group.
The extreme P/S ratio indicates that the market is valuing the company as a high-growth infrastructure play rather than a traditional mining entity. This valuation implies an expectation of massive revenue scaling or a successful pivot to high-margin data center services, which remains unproven given the current lack of positive earnings.
As reported in financial statements, TeraWulf's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -1.9% in 2026Q1, which suggests that the company's aggressive deployment of capital into mining infrastructure is currently failing to generate returns that exceed the cost of the capital being deployed.
The persistent negative ROIC trend highlights the difficulty of compounding value in a capital-intensive industry where hardware depreciation cycles are rapid. Investors should monitor whether the company can improve these returns as it explores non-mining applications for its energized land assets.
According to recent SEC filings, TeraWulf's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.01 in 2026Q1, reflecting the massive scale of property, plant, and equipment investment relative to the revenue generated from its digital asset mining operations during the current period.
This low turnover ratio is characteristic of a business model that requires heavy upfront investment in power infrastructure and ASICs before revenue can be realized. The lack of improvement in this metric suggests that the company's infrastructure is not yet operating at a scale sufficient to drive meaningful asset efficiency.
Based on the provided data, TeraWulf reports a current ratio of 1.20 in 2026Q1, yet this figure warrants skepticism as it may include non-liquid digital assets or restricted cash that could be unavailable to meet immediate operational obligations during periods of market stress.
While the headline current ratio appears adequate, the company's history of negative free cash flow suggests that liquidity is likely maintained through external financing rather than operational self-sufficiency. The discrepancy between reported cash and operational cash burn warrants further investigation into the quality of the balance sheet.
The price-to-book ratio of 73.13 is a commonly misapplied metric for TeraWulf, as it fails to account for the rapid, non-cash depreciation of specialized mining hardware and the potential undervaluation of long-term power interconnects that are not fully captured on the balance sheet.
Using P/B to value this business model obscures the true economic value of the company's energy infrastructure, which is the core of its competitive moat. Analysts should instead focus on metrics like EV/Capacity or replacement cost of power access to better understand the underlying value of the firm.
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying WULF stock.
TeraWulf Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -15.6x. The historical average is 44.7x.
TeraWulf Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -343.7%. The historical average is -26.2%.
Based on historical data, TeraWulf Inc. is trading at a P/E of -15.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
TeraWulf Inc. has 50.9% gross margin and -101.1% operating margin.