Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio N/A · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -107.1%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $58M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $61M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.99 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 6.58 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.7% | 8.7% | 20.6% | 19.5% | 28.2% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | -37.2% | -37.2% | 10.6% | 8.9% | 21.6% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -36.2% | -36.2% | 8.1% | 10.5% | 19.0% | 2.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -107.1% | -107.1% | 29.1% | 44.6% | 192.7% | 90.1% |
| ROA | -48.0% | -48.0% | 8.7% | 12.6% | 43.2% | 1.4% |
| ROIC | -52.1% | -52.1% | 13.8% | 13.0% | 61.6% | 1.7% |
| ROCE | -73.7% | -73.7% | 20.1% | 20.0% | 103.6% | 3.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.46 | 0.46 | 1.06 | 1.33 | 1.15 | 34.34 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.57 | 1.99 | 0.82 | 21.59 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.41 | 0.94 | 1.25 | 1.10 | 32.47 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 1.40 | 1.88 | 0.78 | 20.42 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 1.69 | 5.04 | 1.57 | 16.49 |
| Interest Coverage | -31.93 | -31.93 | 6.80 | 5.19 | 19.54 | 3.65 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.65 | 2.65 | 1.41 | 1.30 | 0.96 | 0.64 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.65 | 2.65 | 1.41 | 1.30 | 0.96 | 0.64 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.23 | 1.01 | 0.96 | 1.52 | 0.65 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 137.62 | 144.67 | 191.72 | 98.62 | 215.64 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $0 | $24M | $24M | $24M | $24M |
Imminent liquidity shortfall risk
Based on reported figures, ZDAI trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 2.99, which appears difficult to justify given the company's negative operating margins and the lack of a clear path to profitability within the highly competitive Hong Kong construction and logistics infrastructure market.
The current valuation appears to be driven by top-line growth expectations rather than fundamental earnings power. Investors should monitor whether this premium is sustainable, as the company's inability to convert revenue into positive operating cash flow suggests that the market may be mispricing the firm as a high-growth technology entity rather than a low-margin industrial contractor.
As reported in financial statements, the company's 8.71% gross margin highlights a structural reliance on low-value-add services, while the -37.18% operating margin indicates that administrative and expansion costs are currently outpacing the firm's ability to generate profit from its core soil transportation and diesel trading activities.
The persistent negative operating margin suggests that the company's current business model lacks the necessary operational leverage to scale effectively. Without a significant shift toward higher-margin specialized construction works, the firm's earning power remains fundamentally strained and highly susceptible to input cost volatility.
According to recent financial disclosures, the company's cash position of $455,953 against $19M in annual revenue reveals a severe working capital mismatch, suggesting that the firm is struggling to manage the timing gap between project-based revenue recognition and the cash-heavy requirements of its logistics fleet operations.
This liquidity gap implies that the company may be forced to rely on external financing to bridge the period between service delivery and cash collection. Such a reliance on external capital in a high-variable-cost environment warrants further investigation into the firm's actual cash conversion cycle and its ability to maintain operations without dilutive equity issuance.
Based on reported figures, ZDAI maintains a cash balance of just $455,953, which provides an inadequate buffer against the high variable costs inherent in its Hong Kong-based operations and suggests a heightened risk of a liquidity shortfall should project payments be delayed or input costs spike.
The current liquidity position appears insufficient to support the company's aggressive 43.16% revenue growth trajectory. Investors should monitor the firm's ability to secure additional funding, as the current cash-to-revenue ratio indicates a precarious financial state that could threaten the company's status as a going concern.
The most commonly misapplied metric for ZDAI is the 43.16% revenue growth rate, which obscures the underlying reality that a significant portion of this top-line expansion is derived from low-margin diesel trading rather than high-value construction services, thereby inflating the firm's perceived growth quality.
Analysts should instead focus on the 'spread' generated from diesel trading and the 'tonnage disposal rate' for construction works to assess true unit economics. Relying on headline revenue growth in this context likely leads to an overestimation of the company's competitive moat and its long-term sustainability.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ZDAI stock.
DirectBooking Technology Co., Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is -107.1%. The historical average is 49.9%.
Based on historical data, DirectBooking Technology Co., Ltd. is trading at valuation metrics that vary. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
DirectBooking Technology Co., Ltd. has 8.7% gross margin and -37.2% operating margin.