Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II Class A Ordinary Shares (NETD)
Valuation Overview•Is Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II Class A Ordinary Shares Overvalued or Undervalued?
Popular:
Weak fundamentals — significant concerns
| Quarter | EPS Est. | EPS Act. | Surprise | EPS | Rev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4'25Latest | — | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q3'25 | — | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2'25 | — | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1'25 | — | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q4'24 | — | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1'24 | — | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q4'23 | — | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q3'23 | — | $0.09 | — |
Total return, benchmark alpha, and annual history in one section.
3Y, 5Y, and 10Y use CAGR when available.
| Period | Return | vs S&P | Dividends |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD | — | — | — |
| 1Y | +107.4% | +77.1% | +102.9% |
| 3YCAGR | +31.1% | +10.1% | +111.8% |
| 5YCAGR | +17.7% | +6.0% | +111.8% |
| 10YCAGR | +8.5% | -5.0% | — |
Year-by-year total return versus SPY, including dividend contribution.
| Year | Stock Return | SPY Return | Alpha | Dividends |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025Best | +111.7% | +16.6% | +95.0% | +105.0% |
| 2024 | +3.9% | +24.0% | -20.1% | — |
| 2023Worst | +2.6% | +24.8% | -22.2% | — |
Based on our multi-model analysis of Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II Class A Ordinary Shares (NETD) at $11.52: Relative valuation verdict: Significantly Undervalued vs industry peers. Fundamental quality score: 31/100 (below average). This is a quantitative summary combining DCF intrinsic value, peer-based relative valuation, quality scoring, and analyst consensus — not a buy/sell recommendation. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before investing.
Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II Class A Ordinary Shares has multiple fair value estimates from different frameworks: Relative fair value: $41.91 (Significantly Undervalued, +263.8% vs current price). We recommend comparing all three lenses — when DCF, relative, and analyst targets converge, the signal is stronger. When they diverge, investigate what assumptions differ.
Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II Class A Ordinary Shares's financial health as measured by our composite scoring: Overall quality score: 31/100. Piotroski F-Score: 4/9 (moderate). Return on invested capital: -1.0%. Cash conversion (OCF/NI): -0.03x (earnings exceed cash generation). The quality score blends profitability (ROIC, ROE, margins), solvency (leverage, coverage, Z-Score), and growth trajectory into a single 0–100 framework updated end-of-day.
Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II Class A Ordinary Shares's performance profile: 1-year total return: +107.4%. 1-year alpha vs S&P 500: +77.1% (outperforming the benchmark). 5-year CAGR: +17.7%. Maximum drawdown (1Y): -1.3%. Relative Strength rating: 49/99 (weak momentum). Beta: 0.02 (less volatile than the market). Total returns include reinvested dividends. Alpha is calculated against the S&P 500 Total Return Index over matching periods.
Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II Class A Ordinary Shares does not currently pay a dividend or conduct significant share buybacks. The company is retaining capital for reinvestment.
No analyst coverage data available for NETD.
Key risks identified for Nabors Energy Transition Corp. II Class A Ordinary Shares: No significant risk flags detected in the current quantitative assessment. Note: This model does not capture regulatory changes, management decisions, competitive disruption, or geopolitical events. Macro and qualitative risks remain material and should be assessed independently.
No. This overview dashboard aggregates data from our DCF intrinsic value model, relative peer multiples model, proprietary estimates engine, and third-party analyst consensus feeds. It is strictly for educational and informational purposes. The operator of this platform is not a registered investment advisor (RIA), broker-dealer, or financial planner. All model outputs, fair value estimates, quality scores, and signals are automated quantitative computations and should not be construed as investment recommendations. Consult a qualified, licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past model performance does not guarantee future results.