MODEL VERDICT
Stem, Inc. (STEM)
Relative Valuation•Peer multiples, Monte Carlo simulation & quality-adjusted fair value
Popular:
Composite score derived from valuation, quality, and risk factors
Quantitative model thresholds · For educational and research purposes only
| Methodology | Fair Value | vs Current | Weight | Quality | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV To Revenue 106 industry peers | $7.91 | -36.4% | 4% | B | Data |
| Price / Sales 106 industry peers | $63.31 | +409.3% | 3% | B | Model Driven |
| Weighted Output Blended model output | $64.95 | +422.6% | 100% | 54 | SIGNIFICANTLY UNDERVALUED |
Cross-sectional regression predicting expected multiples based on growth, margins, ROIC, and beta.
| Multiple | Avg | Median | Min | Max | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P/B Ratio | 2.30 | 2.48 | 1.41 | 3.00 | 0.81 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.81 | 3.78 | 0.67 | 22.58 | 9.81 |
Based on our peer multiples analysis with 5 valuation metrics, the model estimates STEM's fair value at $64.95 vs the current price of $12.43, implying +422.6% upside potential. Model verdict: Significantly Undervalued. Confidence: 54/100. This is a quantitative estimate, not a recommendation.
The blended fair value of $64.95 is calculated using four lenses: industry median multiples (40%), historical multiples (30%), forward estimates (20%), and quality-adjusted multiples (10%). Monte Carlo simulation (10,000 iterations) gives a range of $18.87 (P10) to $114.88 (P90), with a median of $60.83.
STEM's current P/E of -0.1x compares to the industry median of 23.7x (52 peers in the group). This represents a -100.5% discount to the industry. The historical average P/E is N/Ax over 0 years. Signal: Deep Discount.
17 analysts cover STEM with a consensus rating of Hold. The consensus price target is $19.50 (range: $16.00 — $23.00), implying +56.9% upside from the current price. Grade breakdown: Strong Buy (0), Buy (5), Hold (11), Sell (1), Strong Sell (0).
The model confidence score is 54/100, based on: data completeness (6), peer quality (25), historical depth (16), earnings stability (5), and model agreement (2). Cyclicality penalty: -0 points. The model shows moderate agreement across inputs.
The model flags several key risks: (1) Macro/regulatory risks are not captured in this model but remain material.
Peak earnings risk data is not available for STEM.
No. This dashboard is a quantitative research tool for educational and informational purposes only. It is not investment advice, a solicitation, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The operator of this platform is not a registered investment advisor (RIA), broker-dealer, or financial planner. All model outputs, fair value estimates, signals, and scenarios are the result of automated quantitative computations and should not be construed as professional financial guidance. You should consult a qualified, licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Past model performance is not indicative of future results.