AEG
Aegon Ltd.
Insurance - Diversified
Market Cap$12.37B
5Y Perf.+208.1%
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AEG vs MET vs PRU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MET
MetLife, Inc.
Insurance - Life
Market Cap$51.39B
5Y Perf.+118.9%
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
Insurance - Life
Market Cap$34.58B
5Y Perf.+63.1%
AEG vs MET vs PRU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AEG | MET | PRU |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Life | Insurance - Life |
| Market Cap | $12.37B | $51.39B | $34.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29.40B | $76.94B | $61.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.25B | $3.62B | $3.48B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 28.4% | 30.8% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | 6.3% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 8.0x | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.00B | $20.18B | $22.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.47B | $22.03B | $19.71B |
AEG vs MET vs PRU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AEG
MET
PRU
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aegon Ltd. (AEG) | 100 | 308.1 | +208.1% |
| MetLife, Inc. (MET) | 100 | 218.9 | +118.9% |
| Prudential Financia… (PRU) | 100 | 163.1 | +63.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEG vs MET vs PRU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PRU leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Aegon Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AEG
Aegon Ltd.
The Insurance Pick
AEG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 50.4%, EPS growth 350.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -25.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 53.6%, current ratio 4.14x
- Beta 0.86, yield 3.7%, current ratio 4.14x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MET
MetLife, Inc.
The Insurance Pick
MET is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 153.9% 10Y total return vs AEG's 101.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
The Insurance Pick
PRU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 5.5%
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 9.4x)
- Combined ratio 0.9 vs MET's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AEG | 50.4% revenue growth vs PRU's -14.0% |
| Value | PRU | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 9.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | PRU | Combined ratio 0.9 vs MET's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) |
| Stability / Safety | AEG | Beta 0.86 vs MET's 1.09, lower leverage |
| Dividends | PRU | 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs MET's 2.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AEG | +29.3% vs PRU's +3.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PRU | 0.6% ROA vs AEG's 0.4%, ROIC 10.0% vs 4.7% |
AEG vs MET vs PRU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
AEG vs MET vs PRU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAEGLAGGINGMET
METMetLife, Inc.
0leads
PRUPrudential Financial,…
1leads
AEGAegon Ltd.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PRUvs METMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AEG4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PRU4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AEG5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AEG5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
AEG2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MET is the larger business by revenue, generating $76.9B annually — 2.6x AEG's $29.4B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.6% (PRU) to 4.2% (AEG). On growth, AEG holds the edge at +106.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AEGAegon Ltd. | METMetLife, Inc. | PRUPrudential Financ… |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29.4B | $76.9B | $61.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.2B | $5.9B | $5.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $3.6B | $3.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $509M | $16.5B | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +28.4% | +30.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +6.3% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +4.7% | +5.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +21.5% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.2% | +4.4% | +6.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | +35.9% | -12.8% |
AEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PRU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, PRU trades at a 58% valuation discount to AEG's 23.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRU's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AEG's 19.3x.
| Metric | AEGAegon Ltd. | METMetLife, Inc. | PRUPrudential Financ… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.4B | $51.4B | $34.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.2B | $49.5B | $37.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.33x | 16.42x | 9.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.41x | 8.05x | 7.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.26x | 8.66x | 7.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 0.67x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.51x | 1.81x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.81x | 2.84x | 5.51x |
PRU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEG delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for PRU. AEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MET's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEG scores 8/9 vs PRU's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AEGAegon Ltd. | METMetLife, Inc. | PRUPrudential Financ… |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +12.7% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +13.1% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +1.0% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.70x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$1.8B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.5B | $22.0B | $19.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $20.2B | $23.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 41.15x | 5.51x | 4.76x |
AEG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEG five years ago would be worth $20,140 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,768 for PRU. Over the past 12 months, AEG leads with a +29.3% total return vs PRU's +3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEG at 28.2% vs PRU's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AEGAegon Ltd. | METMetLife, Inc. | PRUPrudential Financ… |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.0% | -1.2% | -11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.3% | +4.9% | +3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.8% | +58.9% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.4% | +32.9% | +17.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.1% | +153.9% | +89.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.2% | +16.7% | +11.7% |
AEG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEG is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MET's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AEG currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs PRU's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AEGAegon Ltd. | METMetLife, Inc. | PRUPrudential Financ… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.09x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.41 | $83.64 | $119.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.61 | $67.33 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.8% | +94.2% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.8 | 67.1 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.0M | 3.5M | 2.3M |
AEG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MET and PRU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AEG as "Hold", MET as "Buy", PRU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.4% upside for MET (target: $97) vs -8.8% for AEG (target: $8). For income investors, PRU offers the higher dividend yield at 5.54% vs MET's 2.88%.
| Metric | AEGAegon Ltd. | METMetLife, Inc. | PRUPrudential Financ… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $96.50 | $104.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 33 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +2.9% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $2.27 | $5.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.8% | +7.6% | +2.9% |
Evenly matched — MET and PRU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AEG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAegon Ltd. (AEG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AEG vs MET vs PRU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEG or MET or PRU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) is the stronger pick with 50. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 0% for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MetLife, Inc. (MET) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AEG or MET or PRU?
On trailing P/E, Prudential Financial, Inc.
(PRU) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Aegon Ltd. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, Prudential Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AEG or MET or PRU?
Over the past 5 years, Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) delivered a total return of +101. 4%, compared to +17. 7% for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MET returned +153. 9% versus PRU's +89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AEG or MET or PRU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus MetLife, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning MET is approximately 27% more volatile than AEG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aegon Ltd. (AEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 70% for MetLife, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AEG or MET or PRU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) is pulling ahead at 50. 4% versus -14. 0% for Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aegon Ltd. grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 2% for MetLife, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MET leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AEG or MET or PRU?
Prudential Financial, Inc.
(PRU) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 3. 5% for Aegon Ltd. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRU leads at 7. 9% versus 3. 4% for AEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AEG or MET or PRU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Prudential Financial, Inc.
(PRU) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 9. 4x for Aegon Ltd. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MET: 22. 4% to $96. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AEG or MET or PRU?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 9% for MetLife, Inc. (MET).
09Is AEG or MET or PRU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 3. 7% yield, +101. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEG: +101. 1%, MET: +153. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AEG and MET and PRU?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AEG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MET is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PRU is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AEG: 106.2% · MET: 4.4%)Net Margin>
%
(AEG: 4.2% · MET: 4.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(AEG: 23.3x · MET: 16.4x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.