Asset Management
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
AMTD vs FUTU vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
AMTD vs FUTU vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $8M | $55.94B | $650M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $13.59B | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $7.91B | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 82.0% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 48.2% | 48.7% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 1.7x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $283M | $8.55B | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $11.69B | $394M |
AMTD vs FUTU vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| Futu Holdings Limit… (FUTU) | 100 | 984.0 | +884.0% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 200.0 | +100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTD vs FUTU vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 36.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 10.62x
- Beta 0.06, yield 36.4%, current ratio 10.62x
FUTU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.6% 10Y total return vs TIGR's -37.8%
- +58.1% vs TIGR's -25.8%
TIGR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
- 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FUTU's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 1.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FUTU's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs FUTU's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 36.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs TIGR's -25.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FUTU's 0.3% |
AMTD vs FUTU vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTD vs FUTU vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUTU leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMTD leads 1 • TIGR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.6B annually — 251.4x AMTD's $54M. AMTD is the more profitable business, keeping 94.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIGR's 15.5%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $13.6B | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $263M | $10.0B | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | $7.9B | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $0 | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +82.0% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +48.7% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +94.4% | +40.1% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +2.3% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.3% | +112.0% | +12.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AMTD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to FUTU's 31.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TIGR's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FUTU's 64.0x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $55.9B | $650M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $228M | $55.5B | $436M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.25x | 31.71x | 18.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.66x | 7.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.94x | 64.03x | 2.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 32.25x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 6.17x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.46x | 14.22x | 0.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUTU delivers a 26.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $13 for AMTD. AMTD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUTU's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs AMTD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +26.4% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +4.6% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +14.8% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +25.1% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.31x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $221M | -$3.1B | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $11.7B | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $283M | $8.6B | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.18x | — | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUTU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUTU five years ago would be worth $11,259 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $260 for AMTD. Over the past 12 months, FUTU leads with a +58.1% total return vs TIGR's -25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUTU at 56.3% vs AMTD's -40.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -10.4% | -36.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | +58.1% | -25.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.8% | +281.7% | +132.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | +12.6% | -64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | +956.7% | -37.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.4% | +56.3% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMTD and FUTU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMTD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUTU's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUTU currently trades 77.7% from its 52-week high vs TIGR's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 2.04x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.65 | $202.53 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $97.00 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.2% | +77.7% | +49.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 52.3 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 1.4M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUTU as "Buy", TIGR as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for FUTU (target: $225) vs -29.0% for TIGR (target: $5). AMTD is the only dividend payer here at 36.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $224.80 | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +36.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FUTU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMTD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMTD vs FUTU vs TIGR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTD or FUTU or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTD or FUTU or TIGR?
On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus Futu Holdings Limited at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, Futu Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTD or FUTU or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +12.
6%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +956. 7% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTD or FUTU or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Futu Holdings Limited's 2. 04β — meaning FUTU is approximately 3131% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 31% for Futu Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTD or FUTU or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTD or FUTU or TIGR?
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.
4% net margin versus 15. 5% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus 35. 6% for TIGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUTU leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTD or FUTU or TIGR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) trades at 1.
7x forward P/E versus 7. 0x for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUTU: 42. 9% to $224. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTD or FUTU or TIGR?
In this comparison, AMTD (36.
4% yield) pays a dividend. FUTU, TIGR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMTD or FUTU or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 36. 4% yield). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMTD: -91. 4%, TIGR: -37. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTD and FUTU and TIGR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. AMTD pays a dividend while FUTU, TIGR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.