Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CASH vs GDOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
CASH vs GDOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.90B | $698M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $685M | $2.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $191M | $-99M |
| Gross Margin | 90.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 32.6% | 0.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $1.42B |
CASH vs GDOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathward Financial,… (CASH) | 100 | 483.2 | +383.2% |
| Green Dot Corporati… (GDOT) | 100 | 33.1 | -66.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CASH vs GDOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CASH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 0.2%
- 454.8% 10Y total return vs GDOT's -45.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 5.0%, current ratio 0.22x
GDOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.7%, EPS growth -258.0%
- 20.7% NII/revenue growth vs CASH's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 10.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.7% NII/revenue growth vs CASH's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs GDOT's 1.0% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs GDOT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.2% vs CASH's +7.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.6% vs GDOT's 1.0% |
CASH vs GDOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CASH vs GDOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CASH leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 3.0x CASH's $685M. CASH is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GDOT's -4.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $685M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $288M | $99M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $191M | -$99M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $422M | $60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +0.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.6% | -9.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GDOT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $698M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | -$658M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.10x | -7.02x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.09x | 8.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.45x | -6.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.77x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.40x | 0.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.03x | 5.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CASH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CASH delivers a 22.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-11 for GDOT. CASH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GDOT's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASH scores 8/9 vs GDOT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.9% | -10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.6% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$78M | -$1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $65M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.12x | 12.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CASH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CASH five years ago would be worth $17,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,822 for GDOT. Over the past 12 months, GDOT leads with a +53.2% total return vs CASH's +7.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASH at 26.6% vs GDOT's -10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.6% | -0.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.6% | +53.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.9% | -28.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.1% | -71.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +454.8% | -45.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | -10.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CASH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CASH is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GDOT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASH currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs GDOT's 81.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $101.26 | $15.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.87 | $8.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +81.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.5 | 64.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 218K | 499K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CASH as "Buy" and GDOT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for GDOT (target: $16) vs -6.1% for CASH (target: $82). CASH is the only dividend payer here at 0.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.00 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.6% | 0.0% |
CASH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GDOT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
CASH vs GDOT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CASH or GDOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) is the stronger pick with 20.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH). Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CASH or GDOT?
On forward P/E, Green Dot Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CASH or GDOT?
Over the past 5 years, Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) delivered a total return of +76. 1%, compared to -71. 8% for Green Dot Corporation (GDOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CASH returned +451. 0% versus GDOT's -45. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CASH or GDOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Green Dot Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning GDOT is approximately 30% more volatile than CASH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 7% for Green Dot Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CASH or GDOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) is pulling ahead at 20.
7% versus 2. 4% for Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pathward Financial, Inc. grew EPS 9. 3% year-over-year, compared to -258. 0% for Green Dot Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CASH or GDOT?
Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 1% net margin versus -4. 8% for Green Dot Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CASH leads at 32. 6% versus 0. 7% for GDOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASH leads at 90. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CASH or GDOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Pathward Financial, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GDOT: 28. 4% to $16. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — CASH or GDOT?
In this comparison, CASH (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. GDOT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CASH or GDOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), +451. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CASH: +451. 0%, GDOT: -45. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CASH and GDOT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CASH is a small-cap deep-value stock; GDOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.