Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CBNK vs FUNC vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CBNK vs FUNC vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $511M | $243M | $2.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $304M | $112M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $57M | $25M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 73.6% | 68.8% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 24.4% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.3x | 8.5x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $188M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $78M | $185M |
CBNK vs FUNC vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capital Bancorp, In… (CBNK) | 100 | 277.8 | +177.8% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 272.6 | +172.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 144.3 | +44.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBNK vs FUNC vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBNK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 60.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 13.0%, current ratio 0.13x
- PEG 0.73 vs NBTB's 1.54
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 282.2% 10Y total return vs CBNK's 156.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.72 vs NBTB's 0.89
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.3x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.73 vs 1.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.4% vs CBNK's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CBNK's 0.5% |
CBNK vs FUNC vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CBNK vs FUNC vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
CBNK leads 2 • FUNC leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 7.8x FUNC's $112M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.5% (NBTB) to 18.4% (FUNC).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $304M | $112M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $36M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $57M | $25M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $67M | $16M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.6% | +68.8% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | +24.4% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +18.4% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +18.2% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +102.2% | +20.2% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CBNK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, CBNK trades at a 31% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBNK offers better value at 0.73x vs NBTB's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $511M | $243M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $532M | $352M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.22x | 11.87x | 13.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.31x | 8.53x | 10.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | 1.06x | 1.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.24x | 11.36x | 10.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 2.17x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 1.36x | 1.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.59x | 11.94x | 10.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBNK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBNK delivers a 14.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. CBNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBNK scores 7/9 vs FUNC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.8% | +12.5% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.6% | +5.9% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +8.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 1.05x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $109M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $78M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $188M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.16x | 1.01x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,689 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,139 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, FUNC leads with a +24.4% total return vs CBNK's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 44.5% vs NBTB's 15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.2% | +2.3% | +8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.4% | +24.4% | +7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.1% | +201.9% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +126.9% | +31.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.7% | +282.2% | +103.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.6% | +44.5% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FUNC and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs CBNK's 86.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.72x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.40 | $41.95 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.40 | $28.00 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.1% | +89.2% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 44.9 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 11K | 232K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBNK as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.1% upside for CBNK (target: $37) vs -33.2% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs CBNK's 1.41%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $25.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +2.2% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $0.82 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +1.7% | +0.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). CBNK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CBNK vs FUNC vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBNK or FUNC or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (9. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBNK or FUNC or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Capital Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBNK or FUNC or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +126.
9%, compared to +31. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +283. 2% versus NBTB's +102. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBNK or FUNC or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First United Corporation (FUNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 24% more volatile than FUNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBNK or FUNC or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Bancorp, Inc.
(CBNK) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capital Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 60. 4% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBNK or FUNC or NBTB?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 18. 4% for First United Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 23. 3% for CBNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBNK leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBNK or FUNC or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBNK: 18. 1% to $37. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBNK or FUNC or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 4% for Capital Bancorp, Inc. (CBNK).
09Is CBNK or FUNC or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +283. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +283. 2%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBNK and FUNC and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CBNK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.