REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLPR vs ELME
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
CLPR vs ELME — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $50M | $193M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $153M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-154M |
| Gross Margin | 80.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $520M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $1.33B |
CLPR vs ELME — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR) | 100 | 42.1 | -57.9% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.9 | -90.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLPR vs ELME
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLPR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -88.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
- 3.0% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
ELME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 33.3%
- -10.7% 10Y total return vs CLPR's -51.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.02x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.5% margin vs CLPR's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs CLPR's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 33.3% yield, vs CLPR's 14.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.4% vs CLPR's -13.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.6% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 0.6% vs -15.3% |
CLPR vs ELME — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLPR vs ELME — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPR and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $153M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $153M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | -$44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | -6.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50M | $193M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | -$619M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.62x | -1.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.55x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.22x | 3.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLPR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -18.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | -15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | -10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$812M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $520M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELME leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ELME five years ago would be worth $8,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,832 for CLPR. Over the past 12 months, ELME leads with a +8.4% total return vs CLPR's -13.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELME at 4.3% vs CLPR's -8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.0% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.0% | +8.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.1% | +13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.7% | -14.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | -10.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.4% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLPR and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ELME is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPR's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPR currently trades 67.5% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.61 | $17.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.83 | $1.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +12.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 70K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
ELME leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 33.33% vs CLPR's 13.97%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.0% | +33.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLPR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ELME leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CLPR vs ELME: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLPR or ELME a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Analysts rate Elme Communities (ELME) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CLPR or ELME?
Over the past 5 years, Elme Communities (ELME) delivered a total return of -14.
3%, compared to -41. 7% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ELME returned -10. 7% versus CLPR's -51. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CLPR or ELME?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Elme Communities (ELME) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
47β versus Clipper Realty Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning CLPR is approximately 103% more volatile than ELME relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CLPR or ELME?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clipper Realty Inc.
(CLPR) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clipper Realty Inc. grew EPS -88. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1066. 7% for Elme Communities. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CLPR or ELME?
Elme Communities (ELME) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -13. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLPR leads at 2. 7% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPR leads at 80. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLPR or ELME?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Elme Communities (ELME) offers the highest yield at 33. 3%, versus 14. 0% for Clipper Realty Inc. (CLPR).
07Is CLPR or ELME better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Elme Communities (ELME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
47), 33. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELME: -10. 7%, CLPR: -51. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLPR and ELME?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.