Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CLSD vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
CLSD vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $398M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-223M |
| Gross Margin | 85.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.9% | — |
| Total Debt | $52M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $78M |
CLSD vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clearside Biomedica… (CLSD) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 26.6 | -73.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLSD vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, CLSD is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
RCKT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.31
- EPS growth 26.4%
- -91.3% 10Y total return vs CLSD's -99.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs CLSD's -79.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs CLSD's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -45.2% vs CLSD's -96.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -67.5% ROA vs CLSD's -144.9% |
CLSD vs RCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CLSD vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLSD and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $3M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$23M | -$232M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | -$190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
RCKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $398M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $345M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | -1.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCKT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLSD scores 2/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -80.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -144.9% | -67.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -63.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -121.5% | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.39x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCKT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCKT five years ago would be worth $838 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $100 for CLSD. Over the past 12 months, RCKT leads with a -45.2% total return vs CLSD's -96.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCKT at -44.4% vs CLSD's -70.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.3% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.8% | -45.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -82.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -91.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -91.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.9% | -44.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RCKT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLSD's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCKT currently trades 49.7% from its 52-week high vs CLSD's 2.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.09 | $7.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.9% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCKT leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
CLSD vs RCKT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLSD or RCKT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CLSD or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) delivered a total return of -91. 6%, compared to -99. 0% for Clearside Biomedical, Inc. (CLSD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCKT returned -91. 3% versus CLSD's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CLSD or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Clearside Biomedical, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning CLSD is approximately 102% more volatile than RCKT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CLSD or RCKT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 26. 4% year-over-year, compared to 11. 3% for Clearside Biomedical, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CLSD or RCKT?
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -20. 6% for Clearside Biomedical, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCKT leads at 0. 0% versus -1735. 7% for CLSD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLSD leads at 91. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CLSD or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CLSD or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Clearside Biomedical, Inc. (CLSD) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCKT: -91. 3%, CLSD: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CLSD and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.