Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
CREVW vs CREV vs THRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
CREVW vs CREV vs THRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | — | $775K | $944M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $58M | $1.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-221M | $-46M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | -155.1% | -40.2% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | -235.9% | -63.3% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $111M | $295M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $4M | $161M |
CREVW vs CREV vs THRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREVW) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.8% |
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREV) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM) | 100 | 77.7 | -22.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREVW vs CREV vs THRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREVW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.80
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 0.86x
CREV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 86.8%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
THRM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -14.9% 10Y total return vs CREV's -98.6%
- 1.5% margin vs CREVW's -309.4%
- +19.1% vs CREVW's -89.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.8% revenue growth vs THRM's 2.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs CREVW's -309.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs CREV's 1.92 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.1% vs CREVW's -89.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs CREVW's -198.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs -27.1% |
CREVW vs CREV vs THRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CREVW vs CREV vs THRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
THRM leads in 3 of 6 categories
CREV leads 1 • CREVW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THRM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 26.6x CREV's $58M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.5% (THRM) to -3.1% (CREVW). On growth, CREV holds the edge at +107.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $58M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$25M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$46M | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$62M | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -155.1% | -40.2% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -63.3% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -79.6% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.6% | -107.6% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +107.9% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -156.9% | — |
Valuation Metrics
CREV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $775,174 | $944M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $78M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | — | 51.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.02x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 15.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
THRM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), THRM scores 5/9 vs CREV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -198.1% | -25.2% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | -27.1% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | -3.1% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $107M | $107M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $4M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $111M | $295M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.46x | -6.46x | 5.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
THRM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in THRM five years ago would be worth $4,200 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for CREV. Over the past 12 months, THRM leads with a +19.1% total return vs CREVW's -89.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors THRM at -19.6% vs CREV's -76.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.4% | -76.8% | -16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.7% | -85.9% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.6% | -48.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.6% | -58.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -98.6% | -14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -76.1% | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CREVW and THRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CREVW is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CREV's 1.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THRM currently trades 78.0% from its 52-week high vs CREV's 4.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.92x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.05 | $9.20 | $39.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.01 | $25.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.8% | +4.4% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.2 | 44.2 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 188K | 239K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $36.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% | +1.1% |
THRM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CREV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CREVW vs CREV vs THRM: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREVW or CREV or THRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger pick with 86.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) offers the better valuation at 51. 4x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CREVW or CREV or THRM?
Over the past 5 years, Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) delivered a total return of -58.
0%, compared to -98. 6% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: THRM returned -14. 9% versus CREV's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CREVW or CREV or THRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares's 1. 92β — meaning CREV is approximately 139% more volatile than CREVW relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CREVW or CREV or THRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is pulling ahead at 86.
8% versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -70. 9% for Gentherm Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, CREVW leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CREVW or CREV or THRM?
Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: THRM leads at 5. 2% versus -235. 9% for CREV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — THRM leads at 23. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CREVW or CREV or THRM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CREVW or CREV or THRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80)). Carbon Revolution Public Limited Ordinary Shares (CREV) carries a higher beta of 1. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CREVW and CREV and THRM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CREVW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CREV is a small-cap high-growth stock; THRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.