Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
EQBK vs FFIN vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
EQBK vs FFIN vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $969M | $4.61B | $10.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $327M | $739M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $243M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 66.7% | 70.8% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 36.8% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 15.9x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $313M | $197M | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $384M | $763M | $1.43B |
EQBK vs FFIN vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Bancshares, … (EQBK) | 100 | 280.7 | +180.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EQBK vs FFIN vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EQBK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 45.3%, EPS growth 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 52.8%, current ratio 0.28x
- PEG 0.50 vs BOKF's 4.38
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 2.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EQBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs EQBK's 1.1%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.3% NII/revenue growth vs BOKF's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.50 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EQBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs EQBK's 1.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EQBK's 0.4% |
EQBK vs FFIN vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EQBK vs FFIN vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 3 of 6 categories
EQBK leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 10.3x EQBK's $327M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $327M | $739M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $310M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $243M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $290M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.7% | +70.8% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +36.8% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +30.2% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +39.6% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -7.7% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
EQBK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, EQBK trades at a 45% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EQBK offers better value at 0.57x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $969M | $4.6B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $898M | $4.0B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.45x | 20.76x | 16.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.04x | 15.92x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.57x | 3.98x | 5.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.15x | 14.17x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.97x | 6.23x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 2.89x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.83x | 15.73x | 7.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $2 for EQBK. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EQBK scores 7/9 vs BOKF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +13.3% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +11.0% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.1% | +16.0% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.12x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$71M | -$566M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $384M | $763M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $313M | $197M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | 1.48x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQBK at 31.2% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +8.5% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | -3.2% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.0% | +29.1% | +79.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.6% | -28.2% | +59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.1% | +145.4% | +168.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.2% | +8.9% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EQBK and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EQBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.95x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.07 | $38.74 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.04 | $28.11 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +83.6% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 58.2 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 111K | 740K | 317K |
Analyst Outlook
FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EQBK as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.22% vs EQBK's 1.10%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.50 | $39.25 | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.2% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 11 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | $0.72 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
FFIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EQBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
EQBK vs FFIN vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQBK or FFIN or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is the stronger pick with 45. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQBK or FFIN or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Equity Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Equity Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 50x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQBK or FFIN or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +168. 5% versus EQBK's +125. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQBK or FFIN or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 35% more volatile than EQBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EQBK or FFIN or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is pulling ahead at 45. 3% versus 10. 4% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Equity Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 700. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EQBK or FFIN or BOKF?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EQBK or FFIN or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — EQBK or FFIN or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 1% for Equity Bancshares, Inc. (EQBK).
09Is EQBK or FFIN or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equity Bancshares, Inc.
(EQBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 1. 1% yield, +125. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQBK: +125. 1%, BOKF: +168. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EQBK and FFIN and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EQBK is a small-cap high-growth stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.