EXR
Extra Space Storage Inc.
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$29.52B
5Y Perf.+44.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EXR vs CUBE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CUBE
CubeSmart
REIT - Industrial
Market Cap$8.93B
5Y Perf.+37.6%
EXR vs CUBE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EXR | CUBE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $29.52B | $8.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.38B | $1.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $974M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 44.1% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 30.1x | 27.7x |
| Total Debt | $14.97B | $3.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $139M | $6M |
EXR vs CUBE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EXR
CUBE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
| CubeSmart (CUBE) | 100 | 137.6 | +37.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EXR vs CUBE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CUBE leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Extra Space Storage Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EXR
Extra Space Storage Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
EXR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.2%, EPS growth 13.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.8%
- 106.5% 10Y total return vs CUBE's 73.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.28x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CUBE
CubeSmart
The Real Estate Income Play
CUBE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 5.3%
- PEG 2.42 vs EXR's 6.91
- 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CUBE | 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2% |
| Value | CUBE | Lower P/E (27.7x vs 30.1x), PEG 2.42 vs 6.91 |
| Quality / Margins | CUBE | 28.9% margin vs EXR's 28.8% |
| Stability / Safety | EXR | Beta 0.52 vs CUBE's 0.53, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CUBE | 5.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EXR's 4.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | EXR | -2.1% vs CUBE's -3.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CUBE | 4.9% ROA vs EXR's 3.3%, ROIC 5.5% vs 3.9% |
EXR vs CUBE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
EXR vs CUBE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEXRLAGGINGCUBE
CUBECubeSmart
3leads
EXRExtra Space Storage I…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CUBEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EXR5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CUBE6/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CUBE7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
EXR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
EXR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CUBE2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 3.0x CUBE's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 28.9% (CUBE) to 28.8% (EXR). On growth, EXR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.2B | $597M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $974M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | $611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +28.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +54.6% | +54.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | -7.7% |
EXR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CUBE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.8x trailing earnings, CUBE trades at a 12% valuation discount to EXR's 30.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CUBE offers better value at 2.35x vs EXR's 7.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.5B | $8.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.4B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.46x | 26.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.07x | 27.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.00x | 2.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.12x | 17.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.74x | 7.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.07x | 3.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.14x | 15.75x |
CUBE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for EXR. EXR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CUBE's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXR scores 5/9 vs CUBE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | +11.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14.8B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $139M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.0B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.68x | 3.90x |
CUBE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CUBE five years ago would be worth $11,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,680 for EXR. Over the past 12 months, EXR leads with a -2.1% total return vs CUBE's -3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXR at 1.0% vs CUBE's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.0% | +13.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.1% | -3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.9% | -1.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.5% | +73.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.0% | -0.5% |
EXR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXR is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CUBE's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $155.19 | $44.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $125.71 | $35.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +88.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 2.2M |
EXR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CUBE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EXR as "Hold" and CUBE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.7% upside for EXR (target: $149) vs 5.9% for CUBE (target: $42). For income investors, CUBE offers the higher dividend yield at 5.31% vs EXR's 4.64%.
| Metric | EXRExtra Space Stora… | CUBECubeSmart |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $149.13 | $41.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.49 | $2.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.4% |
CUBE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EXR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CUBE leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallExtra Space Storage Inc. (EXR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EXR vs CUBE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EXR or CUBE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the stronger pick with 5.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the better valuation at 26. 8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EXR or CUBE?
On trailing P/E, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the cheapest at 26.
8x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 27. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CubeSmart wins at 2. 42x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 6. 91x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EXR or CUBE?
Over the past 5 years, CubeSmart (CUBE) delivered a total return of +17.
2%, compared to +16. 8% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXR returned +106. 5% versus CUBE's +73. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EXR or CUBE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus CubeSmart's 0. 53β — meaning CUBE is approximately 3% more volatile than EXR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 105% versus 127% for CubeSmart — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EXR or CUBE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CubeSmart (CUBE) is pulling ahead at 5.
3% versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Extra Space Storage Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for CubeSmart. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXR leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EXR or CUBE?
CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
7% net margin versus 28. 8% for Extra Space Storage Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXR leads at 44. 1% versus 40. 0% for CUBE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXR leads at 28. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EXR or CUBE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 42x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 6. 91x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 27. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 1x for Extra Space Storage Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXR: 6. 7% to $149. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — EXR or CUBE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 4. 6% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR).
09Is EXR or CUBE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 4. 6% yield, +106. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXR: +106. 5%, CUBE: +73. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EXR and CUBE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EXR: 9.3% · CUBE: 3.3%)Net Margin>
%
(EXR: 28.8% · CUBE: 28.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(EXR: 30.5x · CUBE: 26.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.