Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBNC vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FBNC vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.45B | $5.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $543M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $111M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $75M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $147M | $910M |
FBNC vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Bancorp (FBNC) | 100 | 232.5 | +132.5% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 186.8 | +86.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBNC vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 228.2% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 0.24x
- +44.8% vs HOMB's -1.3%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.16x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs FBNC's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FBNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs FBNC's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs FBNC's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs HOMB's -1.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FBNC's 0.4% |
FBNC vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FBNC vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 2.7x FBNC's $543M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBNC's 20.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $543M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $155M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $111M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $199M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.1% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HOMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 39% valuation discount to FBNC's 22.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HOMB's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FBNC's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.05x | 13.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.60x | 10.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.42x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.36x | 10.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.51x | 3.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 1.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.31x | 12.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for FBNC. FBNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs FBNC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$72M | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBNC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBNC five years ago would be worth $14,088 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,758 for HOMB. Over the past 12 months, FBNC leads with a +44.8% total return vs HOMB's -1.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBNC at 29.6% vs HOMB's 12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.8% | -1.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.5% | +42.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.9% | +7.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +228.2% | +58.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.6% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBNC's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBNC currently trades 94.3% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.64 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.00 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 202K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBNC as "Buy" and HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.4% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 6.6% for FBNC (target: $63). For income investors, HOMB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.77% vs FBNC's 1.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.00 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.6% |
HOMB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FBNC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FBNC vs HOMB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBNC or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for First Bancorp (FBNC). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Bancorp (FBNC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBNC or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus First Bancorp at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBNC or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, First Bancorp (FBNC) delivered a total return of +40.
9%, compared to +7. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBNC returned +228. 2% versus HOMB's +58. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBNC or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus First Bancorp's 0. 96β — meaning FBNC is approximately 17% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Bancorp (FBNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBNC or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus 2. 3% for First Bancorp (FBNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Bancorp grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBNC or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 20. 4% for First Bancorp — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 26. 6% for FBNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBNC leads at 70. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBNC or HOMB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for First Bancorp — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 18. 4% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBNC or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 5% for First Bancorp (FBNC).
09Is FBNC or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 1%, FBNC: +228. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBNC and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.