Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FPH vs TOL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
FPH vs TOL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $3.50B | $12.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $110M | $10.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $1.35B |
| Gross Margin | 40.4% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.1% | 15.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.3x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $514M | $2.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $427M | $1.26B |
FPH vs TOL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Five Point Holdings… (FPH) | 100 | 97.6 | -2.4% |
| Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) | 100 | 424.2 | +324.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FPH vs TOL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FPH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.87
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 21.5%, current ratio 4.02x
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 4.02x
TOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth -10.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- 437.2% 10Y total return vs FPH's -67.5%
- 1.1% revenue growth vs FPH's -53.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1% revenue growth vs FPH's -53.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 16.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.0% margin vs TOL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs TOL's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.8% vs FPH's -10.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.3% ROA vs FPH's 1.3%, ROIC 13.4% vs -0.2% |
FPH vs TOL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FPH vs TOL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FPH and TOL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 99.3x FPH's $110M. FPH is the more profitable business, keeping 37.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TOL's 12.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $110M | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.4% | +25.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -118.8% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TOL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, TOL trades at a 0% valuation discount to FPH's 10.2x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $13.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $14.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.19x | 10.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.30x | 10.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.79x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.30x | 12.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TOL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TOL delivers a 16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $2 for FPH. FPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOL's 0.35x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | +16.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +15.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $88M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $427M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $514M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TOL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TOL five years ago would be worth $20,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,537 for FPH. Over the past 12 months, TOL leads with a +34.8% total return vs FPH's -10.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOL at 29.6% vs FPH's 27.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.3% | +34.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.3% | +117.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.6% | +109.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.5% | +437.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +29.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FPH and TOL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TOL's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TOL currently trades 81.4% from its 52-week high vs FPH's 73.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.64 | $168.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.72 | $100.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.6% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 49.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 188K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FPH as "Hold" and TOL as "Hold". TOL is the only dividend payer here at 0.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $166.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% |
TOL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
FPH vs TOL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FPH or TOL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 8% for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FPH or TOL?
On trailing P/E, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Five Point Holdings, LLC at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, Toll Brothers, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FPH or TOL?
Over the past 5 years, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) delivered a total return of +109. 0%, compared to -34. 6% for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TOL returned +437. 2% versus FPH's -67. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FPH or TOL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus Toll Brothers, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning TOL is approximately 39% more volatile than FPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 35% for Toll Brothers, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FPH or TOL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -53. 8% for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toll Brothers, Inc. grew EPS -10. 1% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Five Point Holdings, LLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, FPH leads at 37. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FPH or TOL?
Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is the more profitable company, earning 64.
5% net margin versus 12. 3% for Toll Brothers, Inc. — meaning it keeps 64. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TOL leads at 15. 7% versus -6. 7% for FPH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FPH leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FPH or TOL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Five Point Holdings, LLC — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FPH or TOL?
In this comparison, TOL (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. FPH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FPH or TOL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), 0. 7% yield, +437. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TOL: +437. 2%, FPH: -67. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FPH and TOL?
These companies operate in different sectors (FPH (Real Estate) and TOL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TOL pays a dividend while FPH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.