Financial - Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
FSHPR vs BFLY vs ACIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Insurance - Property & Casualty
FSHPR vs BFLY vs ACIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Conglomerates | Medical - Devices | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $157K | $1.11B | $525M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $103M | $335M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $910K | $-76M | $107M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.2% | 63.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -79.5% | 42.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | — | 7.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $20M | $152M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77K | $150M | $199M |
FSHPR vs BFLY vs ACIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flag Ship Acquisiti… (FSHPR) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 370.6 | +270.6% |
| American Coastal In… (ACIC) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FSHPR vs BFLY vs ACIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FSHPR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 100.0%
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 7.3x)
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
BFLY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs ACIC's 13.1%
- +94.5% vs FSHPR's -39.1%
ACIC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -22.2% 10Y total return vs FSHPR's -33.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 48.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.22x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs ACIC's 13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 7.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.9% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs BFLY's 3.28 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.5% vs FSHPR's -39.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC 41.0% vs -76.8% |
FSHPR vs BFLY vs ACIC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FSHPR vs BFLY vs ACIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACIC and FSHPR operate at a comparable scale, with $335M and $0 in trailing revenue. ACIC is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $103M | $335M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$76M | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$76M | $107M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$19M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.2% | +63.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -79.5% | +42.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -73.6% | +31.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -18.3% | +21.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.0% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.0% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ACIC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, FSHPR trades at a 94% valuation discount to ACIC's 5.0x P/E.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $156,844 | $1.1B | $525M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80,097 | $979M | $478M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | -13.68x | 5.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 11.37x | 1.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.35x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACIC delivers a 35.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACIC's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACIC scores 6/9 vs FSHPR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -36.8% | +35.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -25.6% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -76.8% | +41.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -39.3% | +26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$76,747 | -$130M | -$46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76,747 | $150M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $20M | $152M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -71.59x | 14.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACIC five years ago would be worth $20,705 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,490 for BFLY. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs FSHPR's -39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACIC at 37.3% vs FSHPR's -12.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.1% | +13.1% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.1% | +94.5% | -0.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | +100.9% | +159.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | -65.1% | +107.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.4% | -57.2% | -22.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.7% | +26.2% | +37.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ACIC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACIC currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs FSHPR's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 3.28x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.22 | $5.72 | $13.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $1.32 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.5% | +74.1% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 46.2 | 31.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 6.4M | 188K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFLY as "Buy", ACIC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.8% upside for BFLY (target: $5) vs -82.5% for ACIC (target: $2). FSHPR is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.42 | $1.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACIC leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
FSHPR vs BFLY vs ACIC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 1% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC). Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC?
On trailing P/E, Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation (FSHPR) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus American Coastal Insurance Corporation at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC?
Over the past 5 years, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) delivered a total return of +107.
0%, compared to -65. 1% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACIC returned -22. 2% versus BFLY's -57. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 738% more volatile than ACIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 48% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 13. 1% for American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flag Ship Acquisition Corporation grew EPS 947. 5% year-over-year, compared to 8. 8% for Butterfly Network, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACIC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC?
American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
8% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACIC leads at 42. 6% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACIC leads at 86. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFLY: 27.
8% to $5. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC?
In this comparison, FSHPR (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. BFLY, ACIC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FSHPR or BFLY or ACIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Coastal Insurance Corporation (ACIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
39)). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACIC: -22. 2%, BFLY: -57. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FSHPR and BFLY and ACIC?
These companies operate in different sectors (FSHPR (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and ACIC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FSHPR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACIC is a small-cap deep-value stock. FSHPR pays a dividend while BFLY, ACIC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.