Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FUNC vs MNSB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FUNC
First United Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$244M
5Y Perf.+172.6%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$175M
5Y Perf.+76.0%

FUNC vs MNSB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FUNC logoFUNC
MNSB logoMNSB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$244M$175M
Revenue (TTM)$112M$136M
Net Income (TTM)$25M$16M
Gross Margin68.8%54.4%
Operating Margin24.4%14.0%
Forward P/E8.5x10.4x
Total Debt$188M$70M
Cash & Equiv.$78M$25M

FUNC vs MNSBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FUNC
MNSB
StockMay 20May 26Return
First United Corpor… (FUNC)100272.6+172.6%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100176.0+76.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FUNC vs MNSB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FUNC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FUNC
First United Corporation
The Banking Pick

FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
  • Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
  • 283.2% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 128.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
  • Beta 0.66
  • NIM 3.1% vs FUNC's 3.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUNC logoFUNC16.9% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueFUNC logoFUNCLower P/E (8.5x vs 10.4x)
Quality / MarginsMNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyMNSB logoMNSBBeta 0.66 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage
DividendsFUNC logoFUNC2.2% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FUNC logoFUNC+27.7% vs MNSB's +24.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4%

FUNC vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FUNCFirst United Corporation
FY 2024
Trust Department
51.3%$9M
Debit Card Income
22.9%$4M
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
12.5%$2M
Brokerage Commissions
8.2%$1M
Other Service Charges
5.0%$887,000
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M

FUNC vs MNSB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFUNCLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

MNSB and FUNC operate at a comparable scale, with $136M and $112M in trailing revenue. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$136M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$36M$23M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$25M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$16M$13M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.8%+54.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+24.4%+14.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.2%+7.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.2%+120.9%
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.9x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 10% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FUNC's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.5x.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Market CapShares × price$244M$175M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$353M$220M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.91x13.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.53x10.38x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.38x11.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.18x1.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.37x0.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.97x16.46x
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 6/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.5%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.9%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.5%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.05x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$109M$45M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$78M$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$188M$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.01x0.31x
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,864 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, FUNC leads with a +27.7% total return vs MNSB's +24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 46.3% vs MNSB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.6%+18.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.7%+24.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+213.3%+20.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+129.8%+18.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+283.2%+128.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+46.3%+6.5%
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 89.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$41.95$25.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$28.00$17.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.4%+92.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.451.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K59K
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FUNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates FUNC as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". FUNC is the only dividend payer here at 2.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts11
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises72
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.7%0.0%
FUNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FUNC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNSB leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallFirst United Corporation (FUNC)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FUNC vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FUNC or MNSB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FUNC or MNSB?

On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.

9x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FUNC or MNSB?

Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +129.

8%, compared to +18. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +283. 2% versus MNSB's +128. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FUNC or MNSB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus First United Corporation's 0. 72β — meaning FUNC is approximately 8% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FUNC or MNSB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.

9% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 40. 0% for First United Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FUNC or MNSB?

First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

4% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FUNC or MNSB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8.

5x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FUNC or MNSB?

In this comparison, FUNC (2.

2% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FUNC or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 2% yield, +283. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +283. 2%, MNSB: +128. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FUNC and MNSB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FUNC pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FUNC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNSB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FUNC and MNSB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FUNC: 16.9% · MNSB: -1.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(FUNC: 18.4% · MNSB: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FUNC: 11.9x · MNSB: 13.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.