Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FUNC vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FUNC vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $244M | $175M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 68.8% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $188M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $25M |
FUNC vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 272.6 | +172.6% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 176.0 | +76.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FUNC vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 283.2% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 128.0%
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
- Beta 0.66
- NIM 3.1% vs FUNC's 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.7% vs MNSB's +24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% |
FUNC vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FUNC vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB and FUNC operate at a comparable scale, with $136M and $112M in trailing revenue. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.8% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.2% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 10% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FUNC's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $244M | $175M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $353M | $220M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.91x | 13.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.53x | 10.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.38x | 11.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.37x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.97x | 16.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 6/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $109M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $188M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.01x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $22,977 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,864 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, FUNC leads with a +27.7% total return vs MNSB's +24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 46.3% vs MNSB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | +24.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +213.3% | +20.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.8% | +18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.2% | +128.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.3% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 89.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.95 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.00 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.4% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 59K |
Analyst Outlook
FUNC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FUNC as "Buy" and MNSB as "Hold". FUNC is the only dividend payer here at 2.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | 0.0% |
FUNC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNSB leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
FUNC vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FUNC or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FUNC or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
9x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FUNC or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +129.
8%, compared to +18. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +283. 2% versus MNSB's +128. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FUNC or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus First United Corporation's 0. 72β — meaning FUNC is approximately 8% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FUNC or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 40. 0% for First United Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FUNC or MNSB?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FUNC or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8.
5x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FUNC or MNSB?
In this comparison, FUNC (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FUNC or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +283. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +283. 2%, MNSB: +128. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FUNC and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FUNC pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.