Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FUNC vs MNSB vs CARE vs FXNC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FUNC
First United Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$248M
5Y Perf.+177.5%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$176M
5Y Perf.+77.2%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$580M
5Y Perf.+271.0%
FXNC
First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$253M
5Y Perf.+110.5%

FUNC vs MNSB vs CARE vs FXNC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FUNC logoFUNC
MNSB logoMNSB
CARE logoCARE
FXNC logoFXNC
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$248M$176M$580M$253M
Revenue (TTM)$112M$136M$255M$112M
Net Income (TTM)$25M$16M$31M$18M
Gross Margin68.8%54.4%61.7%74.0%
Operating Margin24.4%14.0%15.7%19.6%
Forward P/E8.7x10.4x4.8x11.7x
Total Debt$188M$70M$179M$43M
Cash & Equiv.$78M$25M$105M$161M

FUNC vs MNSB vs CARE vs FXNCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FUNC
MNSB
CARE
FXNC
StockMay 20May 26Return
First United Corpor… (FUNC)100277.5+177.5%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100177.2+77.2%
Carter Bankshares, … (CARE)100371.0+271.0%
First National Corp… (FXNC)100210.5+110.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FUNC vs MNSB vs CARE vs FXNC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MNSB and CARE are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Carter Bankshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. FXNC and FUNC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FUNC
First United Corporation
The Banking Pick

FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 289.2% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 241.1%
  • PEG 0.77 vs FXNC's 7.87
  • Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.77 vs 7.87
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CARE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 42.5%, current ratio 0.75x
  • Beta 0.56 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage
  • +69.0% vs MNSB's +26.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
FXNC
First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
  • Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
  • Beta 0.70, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.10x
  • NIM 3.6% vs CARE's 2.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFXNC logoFXNC27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueFUNC logoFUNCLower P/E (8.7x vs 11.7x), PEG 0.77 vs 7.87
Quality / MarginsMNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCARE logoCAREBeta 0.56 vs FUNC's 0.72, lower leverage
DividendsFXNC logoFXNC2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CARE logoCARE+69.0% vs MNSB's +26.4%
Efficiency (ROA)MNSB logoMNSBEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5%

FUNC vs MNSB vs CARE vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FUNCFirst United Corporation
FY 2024
Trust Department
51.3%$9M
Debit Card Income
22.9%$4M
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
12.5%$2M
Brokerage Commissions
8.2%$1M
Other Service Charges
5.0%$887,000
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M
CARECarter Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income
74.0%$2M
Other Revenue
26.0%$532,000
FXNCFirst National Corporation
FY 2018
Bank Servicing And Deposit Account
41.2%$3M
Credit And Debit Card
29.2%$2M
Financial Service, Wealth Management
21.8%$2M
Financial Service, Other
7.8%$601,000

FUNC vs MNSB vs CARE vs FXNC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFXNCLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

CARE is the larger business by revenue, generating $255M annually — 2.3x FUNC's $112M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$112M$136M$255M$112M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$36M$23M$46M$25M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$25M$16M$31M$18M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$16M$13M$30M$21M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.8%+54.4%+61.7%+74.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+24.4%+14.0%+15.7%+19.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+11.5%+12.3%+15.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.2%+7.8%+12.5%+18.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.2%+120.9%+8.3%+7.1%
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FUNC and MNSB and FXNC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 35% valuation discount to CARE's 18.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…
Market CapShares × price$248M$176M$580M$253M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$357M$221M$654M$134M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.12x13.36x18.71x14.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.68x10.45x4.77x11.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.08x9.55x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.52x11.58x16.34x6.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.22x1.30x2.28x2.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.39x0.82x1.40x1.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.18x16.57x18.25x12.03x
Evenly matched — FUNC and MNSB and FXNC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. FXNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CARE scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.5%+7.3%+7.6%+10.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+0.7%+0.7%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.9%+5.0%+5.7%+7.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.5%+0.9%+1.5%+9.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96587
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.05x0.32x0.43x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$109M$45M$73M-$118M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$78M$25M$105M$161M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$188M$70M$179M$43M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.01x0.31x0.39x0.84x
FXNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,056 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CARE leads with a +69.0% total return vs MNSB's +26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.4%+19.4%+34.8%+14.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.8%+26.4%+69.0%+46.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+218.6%+21.5%+94.7%+110.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+134.5%+20.6%+87.2%+68.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+289.2%+126.9%+112.9%+241.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+47.1%+6.7%+24.9%+28.2%
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CARE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUNC's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARE currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.72x0.66x0.56x0.70x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$41.95$25.17$26.58$29.85
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$28.00$17.86$15.37$18.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.0%+93.4%+98.5%+93.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.650.475.447.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K58K276K80K
CARE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FUNC as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", CARE as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.1% upside for CARE (target: $27) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FXNC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.19% vs FUNC's 2.15%.

MetricFUNC logoFUNCFirst United Corp…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…FXNC logoFXNCFirst National Co…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$27.00$21.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1141
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.2%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises72011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82$0.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.6%0.0%+3.4%+0.1%
FXNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FXNC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FUNC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallFirst National Corporation (FXNC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FUNC vs MNSB vs CARE vs FXNC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC?

On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 12.

1x versus Carter Bankshares, Inc. at 18. 7x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC?

Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.

5%, compared to +20. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus CARE's +112. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus First United Corporation's 0. 72β — meaning FUNC is approximately 27% more volatile than CARE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First National Corporation (FXNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.

1% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 32. 1% for Carter Bankshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC?

First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.

4% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for First National Corporation — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CARE: 3. 1% to $27. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC?

In this comparison, FXNC (2.

2% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB, CARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FUNC or MNSB or CARE or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 2% yield, +289. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +289. 2%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FUNC and MNSB and CARE and FXNC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. FUNC, FXNC pay a dividend while MNSB, CARE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FUNC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNSB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CARE

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FXNC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FUNC and MNSB and CARE and FXNC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FUNC: 16.9% · MNSB: -1.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(FUNC: 18.4% · MNSB: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FUNC: 12.1x · MNSB: 13.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.