GHLD vs UWMC

For growth investors, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the stronger pick with 65.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 60. 9% for Guild Holdings Company (GHLD). Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the cheapest at 12.

8x versus UWM Holdings Corporation at 29. 1x. On forward P/E, UWM Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) delivered a total return of +58.

4%, compared to -23. 6% for UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GHLD returned +58. 4% versus UWMC's -39. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

04β versus UWM Holdings Corporation's 1. 50β — meaning UWMC is approximately 3473% more volatile than GHLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for UWM Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is pulling ahead at 65.

8% versus 60. 9% for Guild Holdings Company (GHLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guild Holdings Company grew EPS 343. 8% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for UWM Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

3% net margin versus 0. 9% for UWM Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UWMC leads at 58. 0% versus 10. 1% for GHLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GHLD leads at 90. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) trades at 8.

3x forward P/E versus 10. 2x for Guild Holdings Company — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 71. 3% to $5. 98.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) offers the highest yield at 97. 1%, versus 2. 5% for Guild Holdings Company (GHLD).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

04), 2. 5% yield). UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHLD: +58. 4%, UWMC: -39. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.