GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$9.94B
5Y Perf.+429.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
GTLS vs FBIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.80B
5Y Perf.-23.4%
GTLS vs FBIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | GTLS | FBIN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Construction |
| Market Cap | $9.94B | $4.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.26B | $4.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $40M | $328M |
| Gross Margin | 32.6% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 12.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.74B | $2.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366M | $381M |
GTLS vs FBIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
GTLS
FBIN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 529.3 | +429.3% |
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GTLS vs FBIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FBIN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Chart Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -92.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.3%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs FBIN's 0.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Play
FBIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.8x vs 16.4x)
- 7.3% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
- 2.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GTLS's 0.3%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GTLS | 2.5% revenue growth vs FBIN's -0.4% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 16.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | FBIN | 7.3% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLS | Beta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61, lower leverage |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GTLS's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GTLS | +37.4% vs FBIN's -22.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FBIN | 5.0% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 11.5% vs 7.4% |
GTLS vs FBIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
GTLS vs FBIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFBINLAGGINGGTLS
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
2leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GTLSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FBIN5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FBIN8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GTLS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FBIN1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIN and GTLS operate at a comparable scale, with $4.5B and $4.3B in trailing revenue. FBIN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $4.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $644M | $771M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $40M | $328M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $203M | $455M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +12.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +10.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.1% | -45.9% |
FBIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 98% valuation discount to GTLS's 629.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FBIN's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GTLS's 14.3x.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.9B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $7.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 629.58x | 10.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.43x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.35x | 7.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.33x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 49.04x | 10.11x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIN delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. GTLS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBIN's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIN scores 6/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | +13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 1.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $2.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366M | $381M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.7B | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.08x | 4.58x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTLS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $13,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,770 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, GTLS leads with a +37.4% total return vs FBIN's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.7% vs FBIN's -13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.7% | -21.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.4% | -22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.0% | -35.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.2% | -52.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +740.5% | +0.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | -13.4% |
GTLS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.56x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $208.51 | $64.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $140.50 | $36.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +61.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.6M |
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FBIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GTLS as "Buy" and FBIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.8% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs -6.7% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.38% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | GTLSChart Industries,… | FBINFortune Brands In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $193.81 | $59.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.0% |
FBIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
FBIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GTLS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallFortune Brands Innovations,… (FBIN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
GTLS vs FBIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GTLS or FBIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 4% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GTLS or FBIN?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 629. 6x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GTLS or FBIN?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +33. 2%, compared to -52. 3% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +740. 5% versus FBIN's +0. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GTLS or FBIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 188% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 111% versus 117% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GTLS or FBIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -0. 4% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. grew EPS 18. 3% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GTLS or FBIN?
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 2% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBIN leads at 16. 0% versus 15. 2% for GTLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GTLS or FBIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for Chart Industries, Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 49. 8% to $59. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — GTLS or FBIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is GTLS or FBIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +740. 5% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +740. 5%, FBIN: +0. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GTLS and FBIN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. FBIN pays a dividend while GTLS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(GTLS: -2.5% · FBIN: -0.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(GTLS: 629.6x · FBIN: 10.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.