Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GYRO vs PCYO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
GYRO vs PCYO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $17M | $277M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $29M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $0.00 | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 99.6% | 58.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 35.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.05T | $22M |
GYRO vs PCYO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) | 100 | 47.8 | -52.2% |
| Pure Cycle Corporat… (PCYO) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GYRO vs PCYO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GYRO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.33
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, current ratio 4.13x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 4.13x
PCYO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 156.1% 10Y total return vs GYRO's -30.3%
- +7.3% vs GYRO's +1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 99.6% margin vs PCYO's 46.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs PCYO's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.3% vs GYRO's +1.8% |
GYRO vs PCYO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GYRO vs PCYO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCYO is the larger business by revenue, generating $29M annually — 10.5x GYRO's $3M.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $29M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $176,211 | $13M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $0 | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.6% | +58.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +35.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +46.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +630.3% | -7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +58.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +18.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GYRO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $277M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3.05T | $262M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 21.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -18355313.22x | 26.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 75.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PCYO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCYO scores 5/9 vs GYRO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | — | +8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.05T | -$15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.05T | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.00x | 18.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PCYO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCYO five years ago would be worth $8,014 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,703 for GYRO. Over the past 12 months, PCYO leads with a +7.3% total return vs GYRO's +1.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PCYO at 7.8% vs GYRO's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.8% | +7.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.6% | +25.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.0% | -19.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.3% | +156.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +7.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GYRO and PCYO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GYRO is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PCYO's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCYO currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs GYRO's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $12.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.70 | $9.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 54K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
GYRO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PCYO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
GYRO vs PCYO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GYRO or PCYO a better buy right now?
Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) offers the better valuation at 21.
3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — GYRO or PCYO?
Over the past 5 years, Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) delivered a total return of -19.
9%, compared to -43. 0% for Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PCYO returned +156. 1% versus GYRO's -30. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — GYRO or PCYO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus Pure Cycle Corporation's 0. 79β — meaning PCYO is approximately 141% more volatile than GYRO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — GYRO or PCYO?
Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Gyrodyne, LLC — meaning it keeps 50. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PCYO leads at 29. 4% versus -1. 2% for GYRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GYRO leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — GYRO or PCYO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is GYRO or PCYO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GYRO: -30. 3%, PCYO: +156. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between GYRO and PCYO?
These companies operate in different sectors (GYRO (Real Estate) and PCYO (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.