Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
GYRO vs PCYO vs MSEX vs RILY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Financial - Conglomerates
GYRO vs PCYO vs MSEX vs RILY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Financial - Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $17M | $277M | $950M | $315M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $29M | $199M | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $0.00 | $14M | $44M | $307M |
| Gross Margin | 99.6% | 58.9% | 33.3% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.2% | 35.1% | 28.1% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.3x | 20.0x | 1.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $7M | $419M | $1.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.05T | $22M | $3M | $227M |
GYRO vs PCYO vs MSEX vs RILY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gyrodyne, LLC (GYRO) | 100 | 47.8 | -52.2% |
| Pure Cycle Corporat… (PCYO) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 75.4 | -24.6% |
| BRC Group Holdings,… (RILY) | 100 | 46.5 | -53.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GYRO vs PCYO vs MSEX vs RILY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GYRO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.33
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 4.13x
- 99.6% margin vs MSEX's 22.1%
- Beta 0.33 vs RILY's 2.03
PCYO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 156.1% 10Y total return vs RILY's 252.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 4.8%, current ratio 2.72x
- PEG 1.52 vs MSEX's 12.52
- PEG 1.52 vs 12.52
MSEX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.5%, EPS growth -4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 1.5% revenue growth vs RILY's -11.5%
- 2.7% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
RILY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- +212.9% vs MSEX's -14.1%
- 19.1% ROA vs MSEX's 3.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs 4.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.5% revenue growth vs RILY's -11.5% | |
| Value | PEG 1.52 vs 12.52 | |
| Quality / Margins | 99.6% margin vs MSEX's 22.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs RILY's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 21-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +212.9% vs MSEX's -14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs MSEX's 3.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs 4.7% |
GYRO vs PCYO vs MSEX vs RILY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
GYRO vs PCYO vs MSEX vs RILY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PCYO leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSEX leads 1 • GYRO leads 0 • RILY leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PCYO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RILY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 368.4x GYRO's $3M. PCYO is the more profitable business, keeping 46.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSEX's 22.1%. On growth, PCYO holds the edge at +58.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $29M | $199M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $176,211 | $13M | $81M | $186M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $0 | $14M | $44M | $307M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.8B | -$2M | -$19M | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.6% | +58.9% | +33.3% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +35.1% | +28.1% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +46.6% | +22.1% | +29.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +630.3% | -7.5% | -9.7% | -6.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +58.8% | +10.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +18.8% | -100.0% | +95.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GYRO and RILY each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.2x trailing earnings, RILY trades at a 95% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PCYO offers better value at 1.52x vs MSEX's 13.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $277M | $950M | $315M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3.05T | $262M | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 21.30x | 21.67x | 1.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 20.02x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.52x | 13.55x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -18355313.22x | 26.28x | 15.73x | 8.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.62x | 4.88x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 1.95x | 1.88x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 75.06x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PCYO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PCYO delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $9 for MSEX. PCYO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSEX's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCYO scores 5/9 vs GYRO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.3% | +9.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | — | +8.2% | +3.2% | +19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | 0.0% | +4.7% | +4.7% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | 0.0% | +5.3% | +4.4% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | 0.85x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3.05T | -$15M | $416M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.05T | $22M | $3M | $227M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $7M | $419M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.00x | 18.00x | 4.33x | 3.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PCYO and RILY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCYO five years ago would be worth $8,014 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,797 for RILY. Over the past 12 months, RILY leads with a +212.9% total return vs MSEX's -14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PCYO at 7.8% vs RILY's -29.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | +6.4% | +2.5% | +72.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.8% | +7.3% | -14.1% | +212.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.6% | +25.3% | -25.5% | -64.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.0% | -19.9% | -28.1% | -62.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.3% | +156.1% | +63.6% | +252.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +7.8% | -9.4% | -29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PCYO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RILY's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PCYO currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs GYRO's 64.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 0.79x | -0.12x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $12.15 | $62.18 | $10.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.70 | $9.65 | $44.17 | $2.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.1% | +94.6% | +82.3% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 57.4 | 42.9 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 54K | 159K | 811K |
Analyst Outlook
MSEX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCYO as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy", RILY as "Hold". MSEX is the only dividend payer here at 2.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $53.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | 21 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PCYO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MSEX leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
GYRO vs PCYO vs MSEX vs RILY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GYRO or PCYO or MSEX or RILY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger pick with 1.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 5% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GYRO or PCYO or MSEX or RILY?
On trailing P/E, BRC Group Holdings, Inc.
(RILY) is the cheapest at 1. 2x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GYRO or PCYO or MSEX or RILY?
Over the past 5 years, Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) delivered a total return of -19.
9%, compared to -62. 0% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RILY returned +252. 0% versus GYRO's -30. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GYRO or PCYO or MSEX or RILY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus BRC Group Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning RILY is approximately -1733% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 85% for Middlesex Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GYRO or PCYO or MSEX or RILY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is pulling ahead at 1.
5% versus -11. 5% for BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BRC Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 129. 9% year-over-year, compared to -4. 5% for Middlesex Water Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSEX leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GYRO or PCYO or MSEX or RILY?
Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO) is the more profitable company, earning 50.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Gyrodyne, LLC — meaning it keeps 50. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PCYO leads at 29. 4% versus -1. 2% for GYRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GYRO leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GYRO or PCYO or MSEX or RILY?
In this comparison, MSEX (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. GYRO, PCYO, RILY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is GYRO or PCYO or MSEX or RILY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). BRC Group Holdings, Inc. (RILY) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +63. 6%, RILY: +252. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GYRO and PCYO and MSEX and RILY?
These companies operate in different sectors (GYRO (Real Estate) and PCYO (Utilities) and MSEX (Utilities) and RILY (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: GYRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RILY is a small-cap deep-value stock. MSEX pays a dividend while GYRO, PCYO, RILY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.