Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IAC vs MTCH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
IAC vs MTCH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $3.28B | $8.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.25B | $3.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $663M |
| Gross Margin | 64.6% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 26.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $3.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $960M | $1.03B |
IAC vs MTCH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 91.2 | -8.8% |
| Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) | 100 | 41.5 | -58.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IAC vs MTCH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.04
- 357.5% 10Y total return vs MTCH's 204.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 29.8%, current ratio 2.75x
MTCH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.2%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- 0.2% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.2% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs IAC's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs MTCH's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.3% vs IAC's +19.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.3% ROA vs IAC's 0.6%, ROIC 23.7% vs -1.2% |
IAC vs MTCH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IAC vs MTCH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 1.6x IAC's $2.2B. MTCH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IAC's 1.8%. On growth, MTCH holds the edge at +3.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $129M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $663M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $60M | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.6% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +26.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +29.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.9% | +3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.8% | +45.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IAC and MTCH each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MTCH's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IAC's 14.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $8.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $11.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.13x | 15.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.57x | 11.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.37x | 2.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 73.10x | 8.40x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTCH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTCH scores 7/9 vs IAC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +15.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +23.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +23.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $466M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $960M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.84x | 6.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IAC five years ago would be worth $3,441 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,687 for MTCH. Over the past 12 months, MTCH leads with a +37.3% total return vs IAC's +19.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTCH at 5.5% vs IAC's -0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.8% | +37.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.8% | +17.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.6% | -73.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +357.5% | +204.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.3% | +5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
IAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IAC is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTCH's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.78 | $39.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.56 | $26.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 52.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IAC as "Buy" and MTCH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for IAC (target: $51) vs 11.3% for MTCH (target: $41). MTCH is the only dividend payer here at 1.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.33 | $41.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.6% | +9.2% |
MTCH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IAC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
IAC vs MTCH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IAC or MTCH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the stronger pick with 0. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IAC or MTCH?
Over the past 5 years, IAC InterActive Corp.
(IAC) delivered a total return of -65. 6%, compared to -73. 1% for Match Group, Inc. (MTCH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +357. 5% versus MTCH's +204. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IAC or MTCH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IAC InterActive Corp.
(IAC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Match Group, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning MTCH is approximately 5% more volatile than IAC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — IAC or MTCH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is pulling ahead at 0. 2% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 17. 8% for Match Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTCH leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IAC or MTCH?
Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTCH leads at 25. 0% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTCH leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IAC or MTCH more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IAC: 16.
5% to $51. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — IAC or MTCH?
In this comparison, MTCH (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. IAC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IAC or MTCH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 1. 9% yield, +204. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTCH: +204. 1%, IAC: +357. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IAC and MTCH?
These companies operate in different sectors (IAC (Technology) and MTCH (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTCH is a small-cap deep-value stock. MTCH pays a dividend while IAC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 11%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.