REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ILPT vs PLD vs EGP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
ILPT vs PLD vs EGP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $524M | $132.71B | $10.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $453M | $8.74B | $737M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-54M | $3.21B | $293M |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | 67.7% | 36.1% |
| Operating Margin | 33.1% | 47.0% | 40.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.6x | 35.9x |
| Total Debt | $4.22B | $31.49B | $1.75B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $183M | $1.32B | $1M |
ILPT vs PLD vs EGP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industrial Logistic… (ILPT) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
| EastGroup Propertie… (EGP) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ILPT vs PLD vs EGP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ILPT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +179.9% vs EGP's +26.4%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.2%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.9%
- 2.6% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs EGP's 2.8%
EGP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.8%
- 285.4% 10Y total return vs PLD's 265.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 50.1%, current ratio 0.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs ILPT's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (35.9x vs 41.6x), PEG 2.99 vs 3.84 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.7% margin vs ILPT's -11.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs ILPT's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs EGP's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +179.9% vs EGP's +26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.5% ROA vs ILPT's -1.0%, ROIC 4.3% vs 2.2% |
ILPT vs PLD vs EGP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ILPT vs PLD vs EGP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 19.3x ILPT's $453M. EGP is the more profitable business, keeping 39.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ILPT's -11.9%. On growth, EGP holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $453M | $8.7B | $737M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $306M | $6.7B | $517M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$54M | $3.2B | $293M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $5.2B | $418M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +67.7% | +36.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +47.0% | +40.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.9% | +36.7% | +39.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +59.3% | +56.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +8.7% | +10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.6% | -24.1% | +55.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ILPT leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.6x trailing earnings, PLD trades at a 14% valuation discount to EGP's 41.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.30x vs EGP's 3.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $524M | $132.7B | $10.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $162.9B | $12.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.86x | 35.64x | 41.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.56x | 35.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.30x | 3.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.58x | 23.28x | 25.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.17x | 16.18x | 15.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 2.32x | 3.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.64x | 27.02x | 26.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EGP leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EGP delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for ILPT. EGP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILPT's 4.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EGP scores 6/9 vs ILPT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.9% | +5.6% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | +3.3% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.2% | +3.8% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +4.8% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.69x | 0.54x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.0B | $30.2B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $183M | $1.3B | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.2B | $31.5B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 5.27x | 8.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ILPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGP five years ago would be worth $14,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,811 for ILPT. Over the past 12 months, ILPT leads with a +179.9% total return vs EGP's +26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ILPT at 61.8% vs PLD's 6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.9% | +11.6% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +179.9% | +40.7% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +324.0% | +21.3% | +28.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.9% | +39.8% | +47.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.2% | +265.6% | +285.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +61.8% | +6.6% | +8.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EGP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ILPT's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGP currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs ILPT's 96.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 0.73x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.19 | $145.44 | $203.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.77 | $103.02 | $159.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +98.3% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.1 | 53.1 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 310K | 3.1M | 335K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PLD and EGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ILPT as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", EGP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.1% upside for PLD (target: $144) vs -5.9% for ILPT (target: $7). For income investors, EGP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.79% vs ILPT's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.40 | $144.43 | $204.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 42 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $3.74 | $5.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
ILPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). EGP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ILPT vs PLD vs EGP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ILPT or PLD or EGP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Prologis, Inc. (PLD) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (41. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ILPT or PLD or EGP?
On trailing P/E, Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the cheapest at 35. 6x versus EastGroup Properties, Inc. at 41. 7x. On forward P/E, EastGroup Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: EastGroup Properties, Inc. wins at 2. 99x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 84x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ILPT or PLD or EGP?
Over the past 5 years, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) delivered a total return of +47. 9%, compared to -61. 9% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGP returned +285. 4% versus ILPT's -41. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ILPT or PLD or EGP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Industrial Logistics Properties Trust's 1. 62β — meaning ILPT is approximately 210% more volatile than EGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ILPT or PLD or EGP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 1. 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Industrial Logistics Properties Trust grew EPS 31. 5% year-over-year, compared to 4. 5% for EastGroup Properties, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ILPT or PLD or EGP?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus -14. 7% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 33. 0% for ILPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ILPT or PLD or EGP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 99x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 84x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) trades at 35. 9x forward P/E versus 41. 6x for Prologis, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLD: 1. 1% to $144. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — ILPT or PLD or EGP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 5% for Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT).
09Is ILPT or PLD or EGP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 8% yield, +285. 4% 10Y return). Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGP: +285. 4%, ILPT: -41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ILPT and PLD and EGP?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.