Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
INSM vs RARE vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
INSM vs RARE vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $22.62B | $2.57B | $39.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $606M | $669M | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.28B | $-609M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 83.6% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | -194.0% | -83.9% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 44.2x |
| Total Debt | $768M | $1.28B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $510M | $434M | $1.66B |
INSM vs RARE vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 431.5 | +331.5% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 218.8 | +118.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INSM vs RARE vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.54
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 411.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 3.83x
RARE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ALNY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 13.5% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
- 11.8% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 33.4% vs -86.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.7% revenue growth vs RARE's 20.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs INSM's -210.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 3 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs INSM's -57.3%, ROIC 33.4% vs -86.5% |
INSM vs RARE vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INSM vs RARE vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALNY leads in 2 of 6 categories
INSM leads 2 • RARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 7.1x INSM's $606M. ALNY is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSM's -2.1%. On growth, INSM holds the edge at +152.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $606M | $669M | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.2B | -$536M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | -$609M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$998M | -$487M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.4% | +83.6% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -194.0% | -83.9% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -91.0% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -164.5% | -72.8% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +152.6% | -2.4% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | -17.2% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
INSM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.6B | $2.6B | $39.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.9B | $3.4B | $39.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.35x | -4.48x | 127.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 44.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 70.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 37.30x | 3.82x | 10.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 30.30x | — | 50.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 84.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. INSM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs RARE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -168.4% | -6.1% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -57.3% | -45.8% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.5% | -89.4% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -66.8% | -46.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.04x | — | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $258M | $842M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $510M | $434M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $768M | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.23x | -14.49x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, INSM leads with a +53.5% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSM at 77.0% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.8% | +10.7% | -26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.5% | -21.8% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +454.5% | -44.5% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.7% | -77.2% | +125.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +793.5% | -59.4% | +411.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +77.0% | -17.8% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSM and RARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RARE currently trades 61.7% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 1.42x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $212.75 | $42.37 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.81 | $18.29 | $245.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.3% | +61.7% | +59.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 66.6 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 1.8M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSM as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.2% upside for INSM (target: $217) vs 50.6% for ALNY (target: $446).
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $217.11 | $51.50 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 33 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALNY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INSM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
INSM vs RARE vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INSM or RARE or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger pick with 66.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) offers the better valuation at 127. 0x trailing P/E (44. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insmed Incorporated (INSM) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — INSM or RARE or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +221.
7%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +793. 5% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — INSM or RARE or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 163% more volatile than INSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 104% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — INSM or RARE or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is pulling ahead at 66.
7% versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Insmed Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — INSM or RARE or ALNY?
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -210. 5% for Insmed Incorporated — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALNY leads at 13. 5% versus -194. 0% for INSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RARE leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is INSM or RARE or ALNY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INSM: 107.
2% to $217. 11.
07Which pays a better dividend — INSM or RARE or ALNY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is INSM or RARE or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +793. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +793. 5%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between INSM and RARE and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.