Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
3 / 10Stock Comparison
ISPC vs BRLT vs MEDP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Luxury Goods
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ISPC vs BRLT vs MEDP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Luxury Goods | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $735K | $223M | $12.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $443M | $2.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-12M | $460M |
| Gross Margin | 1.2% | 56.5% | 29.1% |
| Operating Margin | -465.4% | -2.4% | 21.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 47.7x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $269K | $38M | $250M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $79M | $497M |
ISPC vs BRLT vs MEDP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| iSpecimen Inc. (ISPC) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Brilliant Earth Gro… (BRLT) | 100 | 10.7 | -89.3% |
| Medpace Holdings, I… (MEDP) | 100 | 224.0 | +124.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ISPC vs BRLT vs MEDP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ISPC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BRLT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.20, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 47.8%, current ratio 1.61x
- Beta 1.20, yield 1.8%, current ratio 1.61x
MEDP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 21.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs BRLT's -90.3%
- 20.0% revenue growth vs ISPC's -79.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.0% revenue growth vs ISPC's -79.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 47.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.2% margin vs ISPC's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs ISPC's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.9% vs ISPC's -88.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.8% ROA vs ISPC's -133.6% |
ISPC vs BRLT vs MEDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ISPC vs BRLT vs MEDP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MEDP leads in 4 of 6 categories
ISPC leads 0 • BRLT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEDP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 1388.4x ISPC's $2M. MEDP is the more profitable business, keeping 17.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ISPC's -5.4%. On growth, MEDP holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $443M | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$6M | $577M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$12M | $460M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$6M | $745M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +56.5% | +29.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | -2.4% | +21.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | -2.6% | +17.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -1.3% | +27.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.5% | +6.0% | +26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.1% | -2.3% | +16.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MEDP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MEDP's 21.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRLT's 120.8x.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $734,580 | $223M | $12.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$6M | $182M | $12.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | -5.64x | 28.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 47.67x | 24.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.88x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 120.80x | 21.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.38x | 0.51x | 4.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.20x | 2.61x | 27.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 38.76x | 17.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEDP delivers a 120.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $121 in annual profit, vs $-5 for ISPC. ISPC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MEDP's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEDP scores 6/9 vs ISPC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | -14.0% | +120.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -133.6% | -5.5% | +24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -9.7% | +154.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | -3.4% | +65.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.48x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$41M | -$247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $79M | $497M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $268,798 | $38M | $250M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -510.88x | 51.57x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MEDP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MEDP five years ago would be worth $25,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9 for ISPC. Over the past 12 months, MEDP leads with a +42.9% total return vs ISPC's -88.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MEDP at 27.0% vs ISPC's -83.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.8% | -21.2% | -24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -88.2% | +6.4% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -58.2% | +104.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -90.3% | +159.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -90.3% | +1442.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -83.9% | -25.2% | +27.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRLT and MEDP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRLT is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ISPC's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MEDP currently trades 68.2% from its 52-week high vs ISPC's 4.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.14x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $127.20 | $3.10 | $628.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.36 | $1.21 | $284.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.2% | +45.5% | +68.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 51.2 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 56K | 371K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BRLT as "Hold", MEDP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for BRLT (target: $2) vs 16.4% for MEDP (target: $499). BRLT is the only dividend payer here at 1.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.68 | $498.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +7.5% |
MEDP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
ISPC vs BRLT vs MEDP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ISPC or BRLT or MEDP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 2% for iSpecimen Inc. (ISPC). Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) offers the better valuation at 28. 1x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ISPC or BRLT or MEDP?
On forward P/E, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 25. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ISPC or BRLT or MEDP?
Over the past 5 years, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) delivered a total return of +159. 4%, compared to -99. 9% for iSpecimen Inc. (ISPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEDP returned +1426% versus ISPC's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ISPC or BRLT or MEDP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.
(BRLT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus iSpecimen Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning ISPC is approximately 42% more volatile than BRLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, iSpecimen Inc. (ISPC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 55% for Medpace Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ISPC or BRLT or MEDP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -79. 2% for iSpecimen Inc. (ISPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: iSpecimen Inc. grew EPS 87. 0% year-over-year, compared to -888. 6% for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEDP leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ISPC or BRLT or MEDP?
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -543. 7% for iSpecimen Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MEDP leads at 21. 1% versus -465. 4% for ISPC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRLT leads at 57. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ISPC or BRLT or MEDP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 47. 7x for Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. — 22. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRLT: 19. 1% to $1. 68.
08Which pays a better dividend — ISPC or BRLT or MEDP?
In this comparison, BRLT (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ISPC, MEDP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ISPC or BRLT or MEDP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medpace Holdings, Inc.
(MEDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), +1426% 10Y return). iSpecimen Inc. (ISPC) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MEDP: +1426%, ISPC: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ISPC and BRLT and MEDP?
These companies operate in different sectors (ISPC (Healthcare) and BRLT (Consumer Cyclical) and MEDP (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ISPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRLT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MEDP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BRLT pays a dividend while ISPC, MEDP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.