Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KAR vs CPRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
KAR vs CPRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $32.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.93B | $4.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $178M | $1.56B |
| Gross Margin | 46.2% | 45.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 19.3x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.42B | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $142M | $2.78B |
KAR vs CPRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) | 100 | 191.2 | +91.2% |
| Copart, Inc. (CPRT) | 100 | 170.4 | +70.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KAR vs CPRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KAR is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (19.3x vs 21.5x)
- 1.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +26.0% vs CPRT's -45.1%
CPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.51
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 13.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.9%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs KAR's 99.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs KAR's 8.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.3x vs 21.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.8% margin vs KAR's 9.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs KAR's 0.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.0% vs CPRT's -45.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs KAR's 3.8%, ROIC 20.1% vs 6.9% |
KAR vs CPRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KAR vs CPRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KAR and CPRT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 2.4x KAR's $1.9B. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KAR's 9.2%. On growth, KAR holds the edge at +0.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $288M | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $178M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $337M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.2% | +45.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +33.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +30.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.5% | -3.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.7% | -10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, KAR trades at a 22% valuation discount to CPRT's 21.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KAR's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CPRT's 15.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $32.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $30.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.73x | 21.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.31x | 21.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.55x | 15.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 7.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.93x | 3.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.66x | 26.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $12 for KAR. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KAR's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs CPRT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +14.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +20.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | -$2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $142M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $104M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.09x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KAR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KAR five years ago would be worth $15,295 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,027 for CPRT. Over the past 12 months, KAR leads with a +26.0% total return vs CPRT's -45.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KAR at 22.2% vs CPRT's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.1% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.0% | -45.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.3% | -14.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.0% | +10.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +528.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.2% | -5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KAR and CPRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KAR's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KAR currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs CPRT's 53.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.78 | $63.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.54 | $32.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +53.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 976K | 7.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KAR as "Buy" and CPRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.3% upside for CPRT (target: $41) vs 16.6% for KAR (target: $32). KAR is the only dividend payer here at 1.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $40.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% |
KAR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). CPRT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
KAR vs CPRT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KAR or CPRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 2% for OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR). OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KAR or CPRT?
On trailing P/E, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus Copart, Inc. at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, OPENLANE, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KAR or CPRT?
Over the past 5 years, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) delivered a total return of +53. 0%, compared to +10. 3% for Copart, Inc. (CPRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +528. 5% versus KAR's +99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KAR or CPRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus OPENLANE, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning KAR is approximately 85% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 93% for OPENLANE, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KAR or CPRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus 8. 2% for OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OPENLANE, Inc. grew EPS 264. 4% year-over-year, compared to 13. 6% for Copart, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPRT leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KAR or CPRT?
Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus 9. 2% for OPENLANE, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus 10. 2% for KAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KAR leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KAR or CPRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) trades at 19. 3x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Copart, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRT: 19. 3% to $40. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — KAR or CPRT?
In this comparison, KAR (1.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CPRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KAR or CPRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), +528. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPRT: +528. 5%, KAR: +99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KAR and CPRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (KAR (Consumer Cyclical) and CPRT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KAR pays a dividend while CPRT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare CPRT vs CVNA
CVNA overlaps with CPRT in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Compare KAR vs AN
AN overlaps with KAR in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With CVNA + AN
CVNA and AN are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.