Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
KFY vs HSII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
KFY vs HSII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $3.49B | $1.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.89B | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $269M | $37M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 23.3% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $571M | $101M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.01B | $516M |
KFY vs HSII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Korn Ferry (KFY) | 100 | 224.0 | +124.0% |
| Heidrick & Struggle… (HSII) | 100 | 265.4 | +165.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KFY vs HSII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KFY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.3%
- Beta 0.81, yield 2.3%, current ratio 1.83x
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 16.7x)
HSII is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth -84.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 240.0% 10Y total return vs KFY's 172.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs KFY's -1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.3% margin vs HSII's 3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs KFY's 0.81, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HSII's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.9% vs KFY's +4.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs HSII's 2.9%, ROIC 18.5% vs 6.0% |
KFY vs HSII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KFY vs HSII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KFY and HSII each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KFY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 2.4x HSII's $1.2B. KFY is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HSII's 3.1%. On growth, HSII holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $479M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $269M | $37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $288M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +23.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +16.9% |
Valuation Metrics
KFY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, KFY trades at a 90% valuation discount to HSII's 143.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KFY's 7.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HSII's 30.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $812M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.73x | 143.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.73x | 16.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.16x | 30.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 1.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.91x | 2.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.55x | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFY leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFY delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $7 for HSII. HSII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFY's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KFY scores 7/9 vs HSII's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$436M | -$415M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $516M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $571M | $101M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.94x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSII leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSII five years ago would be worth $14,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,176 for KFY. Over the past 12 months, HSII leads with a +39.9% total return vs KFY's +4.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HSII at 34.9% vs KFY's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.9% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.8% | +39.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.2% | +145.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.8% | +47.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +172.4% | +240.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.3% | +34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HSII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSII is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KFY's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSII currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs KFY's 86.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.50 | $59.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.95 | $40.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.3% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 77.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 502K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
KFY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates KFY as "Buy" and HSII as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.3% upside for KFY (target: $70) vs -0.0% for HSII (target: $59). For income investors, KFY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.34% vs HSII's 1.03%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.00 | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.58 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +0.3% |
KFY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HSII leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
KFY vs HSII: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KFY or HSII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 2% for Korn Ferry (KFY). Korn Ferry (KFY) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Korn Ferry (KFY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KFY or HSII?
On trailing P/E, Korn Ferry (KFY) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. at 143. 9x. On forward P/E, Korn Ferry is actually cheaper at 12. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KFY or HSII?
Over the past 5 years, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) delivered a total return of +47. 4%, compared to +11. 8% for Korn Ferry (KFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSII returned +240. 0% versus KFY's +172. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KFY or HSII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Korn Ferry's 0. 81β — meaning KFY is approximately 4% more volatile than HSII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 31% for Korn Ferry — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KFY or HSII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -1. 2% for Korn Ferry (KFY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Korn Ferry grew EPS 42. 4% year-over-year, compared to -84. 4% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HSII leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KFY or HSII?
Korn Ferry (KFY) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus 0. 8% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KFY leads at 12. 5% versus 0. 7% for HSII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFY leads at 26. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KFY or HSII more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Korn Ferry (KFY) trades at 12.
7x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFY: 3. 3% to $70. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KFY or HSII?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Korn Ferry (KFY) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 0% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII).
09Is KFY or HSII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 1. 0% yield, +240. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSII: +240. 0%, KFY: +172. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KFY and HSII?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KFY is a small-cap deep-value stock; HSII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.